Abstract
Background
Poor sleep contributes to adult morbidity and mortality.
Purpose
The study examined the extent to which trait positive affect (PA) and PA reactivity, defined as the magnitude of change in daily PA in response to daily events, were linked to sleep outcomes.
Methods
Analyses are based on data from 100 respondents selected from the National Survey of Midlife in the United States.
Results
Multilevel analyses indicated that higher levels of trait PA were associated with greater morning rest and better overall sleep quality. In contrast, PA reactivity was associated with diminished sleep efficiency. Finally, interactions between PA reactivity and trait PA emerged on all three sleep measures, such that higher event-related change in daily positive affect was associated with impaired sleep, especially among individuals high in trait PA.
Conclusions
Results suggest that high trait PA, when coupled with high PA reactivity, may contribute to poor sleep.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Random effects for the Level 2 intercept were significant in the full model for sleep efficiency [u 0 = 65.39, χ 2(74) = 1263.19, p < 0.001], morning rest [u 0 = 0.26, χ 2(74) = 260.97, p < 0.001], and overall quality [u 0 = 0.24, χ 2(74) = 231.18, p < 0.001], respectively.
To probe the effect of nonevents, we set the slopes of participants who reported no negative events or positive events over the 8-day study period to zero and re-ran all analyses. The pattern of results remained the same. It is also possible that NA reactivity might be driving our results [13]. To explore this possibility, we re-ran all analyses, controlling for NA reactivity effects. NA reactivity was not predictive of sleep efficiency (γ 021 = 0.48, p > 0.10), morning rest (γ 021 = 0.31, p = 0.06), or overall sleep (γ 021 = 0.14, p > 0.10) and, including NA reactivity did not alter the pattern of trait PA and PA reactivity results. From this, we conclude that the main and interactive effects of trait PA and PA reactivity on sleep are not attributable to NA reactivity.
References
Reid KJ, Marinovick Z, Finkel S, et al. Sleep: A marker of physical and mental health in the elderly. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2006;14:860-866.
Kripke DF, Garfinkel L, Wingard DL, Klauber MR, Marler MR. Mortality associated with sleep duration and insomnia. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2002;59:131-136.
Dew MA, Hoch CC, Buysse DJ, et al. Healthy older adults’ sleep predicts all-cause mortality at 4 to 19 years of follow-up. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2003;65:63-73.
Steptoe A, O’Donnell K, Marmot M, Wardle J. Positive affect, psychological well-being, and good sleep. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2008;64:409-415.
Bardwell WA, Berry CC, Ancoli-Israel S, Dimsdale JE. Psychological correlates of sleep apnea. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1999;47:583-596.
Fosse R, Stickgold R, Hobson A. Emotional experience during rapid-eye-movement sleep in narcolepsy. Sleep. 2002;25:724-732.
Steptoe A, Dockray S, Wardle J. Positive affect and psychobiological processes relevant to health. Journal of Personality. 2009;77:1747-1775.
Ong A. Pathways linking positive emotion and health in later life. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2010;19:358-362.
Pressman SD, Cohen S. Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin. 2005;131:925-971.
O’Neill S, Cohen L, Tolpin L, Gunthert K. Affective reactivity to daily interpersonal stressors as a prospective predictor of depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2004;23:172-194.
Cohen JH, Gunthert KC, Butler AC, O’Neill SC, Tolpin LH. Daily reactivity as a prospective predictor of depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality. 2005;73:1687-1713.
Bolger N, Zuckerman A. A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;69:890-902.
Piazza JR, Charles ST, Sliwinski MJ, Mogle J, Almeida DM: Affective reactivity to daily stressors and long-term risk of reporting a chronic physical health condition. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2013, 45;110-120.
Charles ST, Piazza JR, Mogle J, Sliwinski MJ, Almeida DM: The wear-and-tear of daily stressors on mental health. Psychological Science. 2013 (in press)
Parrish B, Cohen L, Laurenceau J-P. Prospective relationship between negative affective reactivity to daily stress and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2011;30:270-296.
Wichers M, Geschwind N, Jacobs N, et al. Transition from stress sensitivity to a depressive state: Longitudinal twin study. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;195:498-503.
Zautra AJ, Affleck GG, Tennen H, Reich JW, Davis MC. Dynamic approaches to emotions and stress in everyday life: Bolger and Zuckerman reloaded with positive as well as negative affects. Journal of Personality. 2005;76:1511-1538.
Finan PA, Zautra AJ, Davis MC. Daily affect relations in fibromyalgia patients reveal positive affective disturbance. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2009;71:474-482.
Mroczek DM, Stawski RS, Turiano NA, et al.: Emotional reactivity predicts mortality: Longitudinal findings from the VA Normative Aging Study. Unpublished manuscript. 2012.
Talbot L, Hairston I, Eidelman P, Gruber J, Harvey A. The effect of mood on sleep onset latency and REM sleep in interepisode bipolar disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2009;118:448-458.
Baglioni C, Spiegelhalder K, Lombardo C, Riemann D. Sleep and emotions: A focus on insomnia. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2010;14:227-238.
Eid M, Diener E. Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;76:662-676.
Eaton LG, Funder DC. Emotional experience in daily life: Valence, variability, and rate of change. Emotion. 2001;1:413-421.
Penner LA, Shiffman S, Paty JA, Fritzsche BA. Individual differences in intraperson variability in mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;66:712-721.
Moskowitz DS, Zuroff DC. Flux, pulse, and spin: Dynamic additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004;86:880-893.
Moskowitz DS, Zuroff DC. Robust predictors of flux, pulse and spin. Journal of Research in Personality. 2005;39:130-147.
Gruber J, Kogan A, Quoidbach J, Mauss IB: Happiness is best kept stable: Positive emotion variability is associated with poorer psychological health. Emotion. 2013, 13;1-6.
Ram N, Gerstorf D. Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging. 2009;24:778-791.
Catalino LI, Fredrickson BL. Tuesdays in the lives of flourishers: The role of positive emotional reactivity in optimal mental health. Emotion. 2011;11:938-950.
Oishi S, Diener E, Choi DW, Kim-Prieto C, Choi I. The dynamics of daily events and well-being across cultures: When less is more. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;93:685-698.
Gruber J, Mauss I, Tamir M. A dark side of happiness? How, when and why happiness is not always good. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011;6:222-233.
Grant AM, Schwartz B. Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011;6:61-76.
Diener E, Colvin C, Pavot WG, Allman A. The psychic costs of intense positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;61:492-503.
Martin LR, Friedman HS, Tucker JS, et al. A life course perspective on childhood cheerfulness and its relation to mortality risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2002;28:1155-1165.
Friedman HS, Tucker JS, Tomlinson-Keasey C, et al. Does childhood personality predict longevity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;65:176-185.
Kernis MH, Waschull SB. he interactive roles of stability and level of self-esteem: Research and theory. In: Zanna MP, ed. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 27. San Diego: Academic Press; 1995:93-141.
Kernis MH, Grannemann BD, Barclay LC. Stability and level of self-esteem as predictors of anger arousal and hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;56:1013-1023.
Kernis MH, Greenier KD, Herlocker CE, Whisenhunt CR, Abend TA. Self-perceptions of reactions to doing well or poorly: The roles of stability and level of self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences. 1997;22:845-854.
Paradise AW, Kernis MH. Self-esteem and psychological well-being: Implications of fragile self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2002;21:345-361.
Almeida DM, McGonagle K, King H. Assessing daily stress processes in social surveys by combining stressor exposure and salivary cortisol. Biodemography and Social Biology. 2009;55:220-238.
Love G, Seeman TE, Weinstein M, Ryff CD. Bioindicators in the MIDUS national study: Protocol, measures, sample, and comparative context. Journal of Aging and Health. 2010;22:1059-1080.
Bradburn NM. The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine; 1969.
Fazio A. A concurrent validational study of the NCHS General Well-Being Schedule No. 73. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1977.
Almeida DM, Wethington E, Kessler RC. The daily inventory of stressful events: An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment. 2002;9:41-55.
Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.
Wenze SJ, Gunthert KC, Forand NR. Cognitive reactivity in everday life as a prospective predictor of depressive symptoms. Cogntive Thereapy Research. 2010;34:554-562.
Lubinski D, Humphreys LG. Assessing spurious "moderator effects": Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized ("synergistic") relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin. 1990;107:385-393.
Kernis MH, Cornell DP, Sun CR, Berry AJ, Harlow T. There’s more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;65:1190-1204.
Bauer DJ, Curran PJ. Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2005;40:373-400.
Preacher KJ, Curran PJ, Bauer DJ. Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2006;31:437-448.
Steptoe A, O’Donnell K, Marmot M, Wardle J. Positive affect, psychological well-being, and good sleep. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2008;64:409-415.
Butler AC, Hokanson JE, Flynn HA. A comparison of self-esteem lability and low trait self-esteem as vulnerability factors for depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;66:166-177.
Crocker J, Wolfe CT. Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review. 2001;108:593-623.
Fredrickson BL, Joiner T. Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science. 2002;13:172-175.
Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist. 1989;44:513-524.
Clark LA, Watson D, Leeka J. Diurnal variation in the positive affects. Motivation and Emotion. 1989;13:205-234.
Watson D, Wiese D, Vaidya J, Tellegen A. The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;76:820-838.
Steptoe A, Wardle J. Positive affect measured using ecological momentary assessment and survival in older men and women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108:18244-18248.
Hamilton NA, Affeck G, Tennen H, et al. Fibromyalgia: The role of sleep in affect and in negative event reactivity and recovery. Health Psychology. 2008;27:490-494.
Peeters F, Nicolson NA, Berkhof J, Delespaul P, deVries M. Effects of daily events on mood states in major depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2003;112:203-211.
Catalino LI, Fredrickson BL. A Tuesday in the life of a flourisher: The role of positive emotional reactivity in optimal mental health. Emotion. 2011;11:938-950.
Ellis BJ, Boyce WT. Differential susceptibility to the environment: Toward an understanding of sensitivity to developmental experiences and context. Development and Psychopathology. 2011;23:1-5.
Belsky J, Pluess M. Beyond diathesis-stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin. 2009;135:885-908.
Pluess M, Belsky J: Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin. 2012. doi:10.1037/a0030196
Author Note
We extend thanks to Gary Evans, Anthony Burrow, and Thomas Fuller-Rowell for their helpful comments on previous versions of this article.
Anthony D. Ong, Cornell University, Department of Human Development, Cornell University. Deinera Exner-Cortens, Department of Human Development and the Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research, Cornell University. Catherine Riffin, Department of Human Development and the Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research, Cornell University. Andrew Steptoe, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London. Alex Zautra, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University. David M. Almeida, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Penn State University.
This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging (P01 AG020166, R01 AG019239) to conduct a longitudinal follow-up of the MIDUS (Midlife in the U.S.) investigation and a National Research Service Award from the National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH18931). Support was also given to the second author through a Doctoral Foreign Study Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The original study was supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Midlife Development. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Anthony D. Ong, Department of Human Development, G77 Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853–4401.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Full Level-1 and Level-2 Models
Level 1: Sleep ij = β 0j + β 1j *(Weekend) ij + β 2j *(Exercise) ij + β 3j *(Caffeine) ij + β 4j *(Sleep Medication) ij + β 5j *(Sleep Time) ij + r ij
Level 2: β 0j = γ 00 + γ 01*(Gender) j + γ 02*(Age) j + γ 03*(Income) j + γ 04*(Self-rated Health) j + γ 05*(Mean Daily PA) j + γ 06*(Mean Daily NA) j + γ 07*(Standard Deviation in Daily PA) j + γ 08*(Standard Deviation in Daily NA) j + γ 09*(Trait NA) j + γ 010*(Trait PA) j + γ 011*(Reactivity to Negative Events) j + γ 012*(Reactivity to Positive Events) j + γ 013*(Net Reactivity) j + γ 014*(Trait PA2) j + γ 015*(Reactivity to Negative Events2) j + γ 016*(Reactivity to Positive Events2) j + γ 017*(Net Reactivity2) j + γ 018*(Trait PA * Reactivity to Negative Events) j + γ 019*(Trait PA * Reactivity to Positive Events) j + γ 020*(Trait PA * Net Reactivity) j + u 0j
β 1j = γ 10
β 2j = γ 20
β 3j = γ 30
β 4j = γ 40
β 5j = γ 50
About this article
Cite this article
Ong, A.D., Exner-Cortens, D., Riffin, C. et al. Linking Stable and Dynamic Features of Positive Affect to Sleep. ann. behav. med. 46, 52–61 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9484-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9484-8