Skip to main content
Log in

Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of the Eaton Classification for Trapeziometacarpal Arthritis: A Systematic Review

  • Symposium: Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Trapeziometacarpal, or thumb carpometacarpal (CMC), arthritis is a common problem with a variety of treatment options. Although widely used, the Eaton radiographic staging system for CMC arthritis is of questionable clinical utility, as disease severity does not predictably correlate with symptoms or treatment recommendations. A possible reason for this is that the classification itself may not be reliable, but the literature on this has not, to our knowledge, been systematically reviewed.

Questions/purposes

We therefore performed a systematic review to determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of the Eaton staging system.

Methods

We systematically reviewed English-language studies published between 1973 and 2013 to assess the degree of intra- and interobserver reliability of the Eaton classification for determining the stage of trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis and pantrapezial arthritis based on plain radiographic imaging. Search engines included: PubMed, Scopus®, and CINAHL. Four studies, which included a total of 163 patients, met our inclusion criteria and were evaluated. The level of evidence of the studies included in this analysis was determined using the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Levels of Evidence Classification by two independent observers.

Results

A limited number of studies have been performed to assess intra- and interobserver reliability of the Eaton classification system. The four studies included were determined to be Level 3b. These studies collectively indicate that the Eaton classification demonstrates poor to fair interobserver reliability (kappa values: 0.11–0.56) and fair to moderate intraobserver reliability (kappa values: 0.54–0.657).

Conclusions

Review of the literature demonstrates that radiographs assist in the assessment of CMC joint disease, but there is not a reliable system for classification of disease severity. Currently, diagnosis and treatment of thumb CMC arthritis are based on the surgeon’s qualitative assessment combining history, physical examination, and radiographic evaluation. Inconsistent agreement using the current common radiographic classification system suggests a need for better radiographic tools to quantify disease severity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong AL, Hunter JB, Davis TR. The prevalence of degenerative arthritis of the base of the thumb in post-menopausal women. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19:340–341.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Belt E, Lehtivuori J, Kaarela K, Kauppi M, Lehtinen J, Lehto MU. Larsen grades in evaluating the first carpometacarpal joint. Scand J Rheumatol. 1999;28:305–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burton RI. Basal joint arthrosis of the thumb. Orthop Clin North Am. 1973;4:331–338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Levels of Evidence 1. 2013. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/?O=1025. Accessed June 11, 2013.

  5. Dela Rosa TL, Vance MC, Stern PJ. Radiographic optimization of the Eaton classification. J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29:173–177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Raedt S, Stilling M, van de Giessen M, Streekstra GJ, Vos FM, Hansen TB. A three-dimensional analysis of osteoarthritic changes in the thumb carpometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 November 7 [Epub ahead of print].

  7. Dillon CF, Hirsch R, Rasch EK, Gu Q. Symptomatic hand osteoarthritis in the United States: prevalence and functional impairment estimates from the third U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1991–1994. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:12–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eaton RG, Glickel SZ. Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: staging as a rationale for treatment. Hand Clin. 1987;3:455–471.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eaton RG, Littler JW. Ligament reconstruction for the painful thumb carpometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1655–1666.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fontana L, Neel S, Claise JM, Ughetto S, Catilina P. Osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint in women and occupational risk factors: a case-control study. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:459–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haara MM, Heliovaara M, Kroger H, Arokoski JP, Manninen P, Karkkainen A, Knekt P, Impivaara O, Aromaa A. Osteoarthritis in the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: prevalence and associations with disability and mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1452–1457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansen TB, Sørensen OG, Kirkeby L, Homilius M, Amstrup AL. Computed tomography improves intra-observer reliability, but not the inter-observer reliability of the Eaton-Glickel classification. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013;38:187–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubik NJ, Lubahn JD. Intrarater and interrater reliability of the Eaton classification of basal joint arthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27:882–885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB. Prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2614–2618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spaans AJ, van Laarhoven CM, Schuurman AH, van Minnen LP. Interobserver agreement of the Eaton-Littler classification system and treatment strategy of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36:1467–1470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wajon A, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L. Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:CD004631.

  17. Wolf JM, Oren TW, Ferguson B, Williams A, Petersen B. The carpometacarpal stress view radiograph in the evaluation of trapeziometacarpal joint laxity. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:1402–1406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the librarians at Lane Library in Stanford University School of Medicine, especially Christopher Stave, for ensuring academic rigor and thorough search strategies for this systematic review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy L. Ladd MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

One of the authors (ALL) certifies that she, or a member of her immediate family, has received or may receive funding, during the study period, from The Ronald and Ann Williams Foundation Charitable Trust and the NIH (Bethesda, MD, USA) (Grants 1R01AR059185-01A1 and R43 EB003067-02A1.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, A.J., Momeni, A. & Ladd, A.L. Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of the Eaton Classification for Trapeziometacarpal Arthritis: A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 1155–1159 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3208-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3208-z

Keywords

Navigation