Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reply to Letter-to-the-Editor: Efficacy and Degree of Bias in Knee Injury Prevention Studies: A Systematic Review of RCTs

  • Reply to Letter-to-the-Editor
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berger VW. Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trials. Stat Med. 2000;19:1319–1328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger VW. Conservative handling of cluster randomized trials. (Comment on: Crespi CM, Wong WK, Wu S. A new dependence parameter approach to improve the design of cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes. Clin Trials. 2011;8:687–698.) Clin Trials. 2012;9:371; author reply 372.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berger VW. Letter to the Editor: Efficacy and degree of bias in knee injury prevention studies: a systematic review of RCTs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2675-y.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brushoj C, Larsen K, Albrecht-Beste E, Nielsen MB, Løye F, Hölmich P. Prevention of overuse injuries by a concurrent exercise program in subjects exposed to an increase in training load: a randomized controlled trial of 1020 army recruits. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:663–670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grimm NL, Shea KG, Leaver RW, Aoki SK, Carey JL. Efficacy and degree of bias in knee injury prevention studies: a systematic review of RCTs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Sep 8. [Epub ahead of print].

  6. Grimm NL, Shea KG, Leaver RW, Aoki SK, Carey JL. Reply to letter to the editor: Efficacy and degree of bias in knee injury prevention studies: a systematic review of RCTs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2676-x.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biometry Research Group, National Cancer Institute, and UMBC, Executive Plaza North, Suite 3131, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7354, Bethesda, MD, 20892-7354, USA

    Vance W. Berger PhD

Authors
  1. Vance W. Berger PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vance W. Berger PhD.

Additional information

(Re: Grimm NL, Shea KG, Leaver RW, Aoki SK, Carey JL. Reply to Letter to the Editor

Efficacy and Degree of Bias in Knee Injury Prevention Studies: A Systematic Review of RCTs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2676-x.)

The author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, V.W. Reply to Letter-to-the-Editor: Efficacy and Degree of Bias in Knee Injury Prevention Studies: A Systematic Review of RCTs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 341–342 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2688-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2688-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation