Abstract
Cerebrovascular accident or stroke is a devastating neurologic event that can have both short and long term urologic complications. The purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date review of the incidence and causes of voiding dysfunction after stroke, the evaluation of voiding dysfunction in patients after stroke, and the recommendations on the management of voiding dysfunction following stroke. The reported incidence of urinary incontinence varies from 28-79 % and the causes of urinary incontinence following stroke are multifactorial. Detrusor overactivity is predominant and detrusor underactivity is somewhat less prevalent. Urodynamic findings in patients with stroke vary depending upon timing of the study and associated comorbidities. Currently there are no large longitudinal studies linking urodynamic findings with location or degree of infarct. Based on current studies, we conclude that patients with detrusor underactivity should be managed with clean intermittent catheterization or indwelling Foley catheter, while timed voiding with or without anticholinergic therapy may be an effective treatment for patients with detrusor overactivity after stroke.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Heron M, et al. Deaths: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009;57(14):1–134.
Brocklehurst JC, et al. Incidence and correlates of incontinence in stroke patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33(8):540–2.
Brittain KR, et al. Prevalence and impact of urinary symptoms among community-dwelling stroke survivors. Stroke. 2000;31(4):886–91.
Borrie MJ, et al. Urinary incontinence after stroke: a prospective study. Age Ageing. 1986;15(3):177–81.
Divani AA, et al. Consequences of stroke in community-dwelling elderly: the health and retirement study, 1998 to 2008. Stroke. 2011;42(7):1821–5.
Kolominsky-Rabas PL, et al. Impact of urinary incontinence after stroke: results from a prospective population-based stroke register. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22(4):322–7.
• Williams MP, et al. Urinary symptoms and natural history of urinary continence after first-ever stroke--a longitudinal population-based study. Age Ageing. 2012;41(3):371–6. This is a large population-based study which found a high prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients after stroke. They found that one-third of patients had urinary incontinence 12 months after stroke and the associated risks factors were pre-stroke urinary incontinence, age, female sex and stroke severity predicting its presence.
Patel M, et al. Natural history and effects on 2-year outcomes of urinary incontinence after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(1):122–7.
Jorgensen L, Engstad T, Jacobsen BK. Self-reported urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized long-term stroke survivors: a population-based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):416–20.
Patel M, et al. Recovery from poststroke urinary incontinence: associated factors and impact on outcome. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(9):1229–33.
Gelber DA, et al. Causes of urinary incontinence after acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke. 1993;24(3):378–82.
Barer DH. Continence after stroke: useful predictor or goal of therapy? Age Ageing. 1989;18(3):183–91.
• Rotar M, et al. Stroke patients who regain urinary continence in the first week after acute first-ever stroke have better prognosis than patients with persistent lower urinary tract dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(7):1315–8. The study showed that the development of urinary incontinence and continued urinary incontinence 12 months after stroke was associated with morbidity and it was a predictor of mortality. Also, they found that if patients regain urinary continence within 1 week of their stroke they have the same mortality risk as patients that did not develop urinary incontinence after stroke.
• Tibaek S, et al. Is well-being associated with lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with stroke? Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2011;45(2):134–42. This series found that the severity of LUTS and urinary incontinence after stroke are associated with an increased incidence of depression. This study illustrated the impact of LUTS and urinary incontinence on patient well being following stroke.
Badlani GH, Vohra S, Motola JA. Detrusor behavior in patients with dominant hemispheric strokes. Neurourol Urodyn. 1991;10:119–23.
Feder M, et al. Urinary continence after stroke: association with cystometric profile and computerised tomography findings. Eur Neurol. 1987;27(2):101–5.
• Kim TG, et al. Effect of dominant hemispheric stroke on detrusor function in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Int J Urol. 2010;17(7):656–60. The study indicated that urodynamics cannot predict the laterality of the stroke, and they found that detrusor overactivity is the predominant urodynamic finding following stroke, regardless of whether the stroke involved the dominant or non-dominant hemisphere.
Linsenmeyer TAZ RD. Urodynamic findings in patients with urinary incontinence after cerebrovascular accident. NeuroRehabilitation. 1992;2(2):23–6.
Natsume O. Detrusor contractility and overactive bladder in patients with cerebrovascular accident. Int J Urol. 2008;15(6):505–10. discussion 510.
• Han KS, et al. Comparison of urodynamics between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients; can we suggest the category of urinary dysfunction in patients with cerebrovascular accident according to type of stroke? Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(3):387–90. This study showed that urodynamics are important for evaluating patients after stroke. This study also found that patients with ischemic stroke are more likely to have detrusor overactivity whereas patients with hemorrhagic stroke are more likely to have detrusor underactivity.
Burney TL, et al. Acute cerebrovascular accident and lower urinary tract dysfunction: a prospective correlation of the site of brain injury with urodynamic findings. J Urol. 1996;156(5):1748–50.
Cifu DX, Stewart DG. Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(5 Suppl 1):S35–9.
Wikander B, Ekelund P, Milsom I. An evaluation of multidisciplinary intervention governed by functional independence measure (FIMSM) in incontinent stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998;30(1):15–21.
Thomas LH, et al. Treatment of urinary incontinence after stroke in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008(1):CD004462.
• Booth J, et al. Rehabilitation nurses practices in relation to urinary incontinence following stroke: a cross-cultural comparison. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(7):1049–58. This study illustrates that other healthcare professionals aside from physicians have an important role in assessing and promoting continence in patients after stroke.
Ostaszkiewicz J, Johnston L, Roe B. Timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002802.
Ostaszkiewicz J, Johnston L, Roe B. Habit retraining for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD002801.
Gelber DA SL. Treatment of post-stroke urinary incontinence (Abstract). J Neurol Rehabil. 1997;11(2):131.
Fieschi C, et al. Clinical and instrumental evaluation of patients with ischemic stroke within the first six hours. J Neurol Sci. 1989;91(3):311–21.
Shamliyan TA, et al. Male urinary incontinence: prevalence, risk factors, and preventive interventions. Rev Urol. 2009;11(3):145–65.
Lum SK, Marshall VR. Results of prostatectomy in patients following a cerebrovascular accident. Br J Urol. 1982;54(2):186–9.
Disclosure
P. McKenzie has nothing to disclose; GH Badlani is a board member of the AUA; this work is supported by an institutional grant from Allergan and Olympus, and royalties from Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKenzie, P., Badlani, G.H. The Incidence and Etiology of Overactive Bladder in Patients After Cerebrovascular Accident. Curr Urol Rep 13, 402–406 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-012-0269-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-012-0269-6