Skip to main content
Log in

Mentoring in the ethics of clinical research: An ongoing need

  • Editor’s Commentary
  • Published:
Current Oncology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A: Mentoring in academic medicine: A systemic review. JAMA 2006, 296:1103–1115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nundy S, Gulhati CM: A new colonialism? Conducting clinical trials in India. N Engl J Med 2005, 352:1633–1636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Srinivasan S, Loff B: Medical research in India. Lancet 2006, 367:1962–1964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gatter R: Conflicts of interest in international human drug research and the insufficiency of international protections. Am J Law Med 2006, 32:351–364.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suntharalingam G, Perry MR, Ward S, et al.: Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. N Engl J Med 2006, 355:1018–1028.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marshall E: Violent reaction to monoclonal antibody therapy remains a mystery. Science 2006, 311:1688–1689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marshall E: Lessons from a failed drug trial. Science 2006, 313:901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lerner BH: Sins of omission. Cancer research without informed consent. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:628–630.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Meropol NJ, Weinfurt KP, Burnett CB, et al.: Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: Implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21:2589–2596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Daugherty C, Ratain MJ, Grochowski E, et al.: Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase 1 trials. J Clin Oncol 1995, 13:1062–1072.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pentz RD, Flamm AL, Sugarman J, et al.: Study of media’s potential influence on prospective research participants’ understanding of and motivations for participation in a high-profile phase 1 trial. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:3785–3791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agrawal M, Grady C, Fairclough DL, et al.: Patients’ decision-making process regarding participation in phase 1 oncology research. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:4479–4484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K: Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 1980, 92:832–836.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Degner LF, Sloan JA: Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:941–950.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, et al.: False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Center Rep 1987, 12:20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller FG: Research ethics and misguided moral intuition. J Law Med Ethics 2004, 32:111–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurie Markman MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markman, M. Mentoring in the ethics of clinical research: An ongoing need. Curr Oncol Rep 9, 235–236 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-007-0027-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-007-0027-y

Navigation