Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lung cancer screening

  • Published:
Current Oncology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-dose CT screening for lung cancer is a complex and controversial topic. This article reviews the history of lung cancer screening trials and addresses the principles and confounding biases associated with screening. Chest radiography was initially used for lung cancer screening in the 1970s. In the mid-1990s helical single-detector CT came into use, followed by helical multidetector CT, the current method of screening. Results from prevalence studies and a few single-arm incidence studies have raised concerns about overdiagnosis and the high rate of nodule detection. Follow-up studies and further investigation are needed. To this end, a randomized, controlled trial sponsored by the National Cancer Institute is underway to evaluate diseasespecific mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Wingo PA, Ries LA, Rosenberg HM, et al.: Cancer incidence and mortality, 1973–1995: a report card for the U.S. Cancer 1998, 82:1197–1207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hulka BS: Cancer screening: degrees of proof and practical application. Cancer 1988, 62:1776–1780.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yatani R, Chigusa I, Akazaki K, et al.: Geographic pathology of latent prostatic carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1982, 29:611–616.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patz EF Jr, Goodman PC, Bepler G: Screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2000, 343:1627–1633. mines the potential bias of single-arm screening trials and strongly supports the need for a randomized, controlled trial before endorsement of lung cancer screening

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DeVita VT Jr, Young RC, Canellos GP: Combination versus single agent chemotherapy: a review of the basis for selection of drug treatment of cancer. Cancer 1975, 35:98–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Folkman J: Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston: Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N Engl J Med 1995, 333:1757–1763.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Swartz MA, Kristensen CA, Melder RJ, et al.: Cells shed from tumours show reduced clonogenicity, resistance to apoptosis, and in vivo tumorigenicity. Br J Cancer 1999, 81:756–759.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Patz EF Jr, Rossi S, Harpole DH Jr, et al.: Correlation of tumor size and survival in patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 2000, 117:1568–1571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heyneman LE, Herndon JE, Goodman PC, et al.: Stage distribution in patients with a small (< or = 3 cm) primary nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: implication for lung carcinoma screening. Cancer 2001, 92:3051–3055.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frost JK, Ball WC Jr, Levin ML, et al.: Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984, 130:549–554.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Flehinger BJ, Melamed MR, Zaman MB, et al.: Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984, 130:555–560.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Taylor WF, et al.: Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984, 130:561–565.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubik A, Polak J: Lung cancer detection: results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia. Cancer 1986, 57:2427–2437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, et al.: Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 1996, 201:798–802.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sobue T, Moriyama N, Kaneko M, et al.: Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung cancer association project. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:911–920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sone S, Takashima S, Li F, et al.: Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet 1998, 351:1242–1245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sone S, Li F, Yang ZG, et al.: Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. Br J Cancer 2001, 84:25–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li F, Sone S, Abe H, et al.: Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology 2002, 225:673–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Armato SGIII, Li F, Giger ML, et al.: Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology 2002, 225:685–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al.: Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999, 354:99–105. Landmark article about low-dose helical CT for lung cancer screening in a single-arm study.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M, et al.: Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 2002, 222:773–781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al.: Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003, 226:756–761. Raises concern about the high false-positive rate of screening with CT, which may be secondary to population sampling and improved CT technique.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 0057, 77030, Houston, TX, USA

    Mylene T. Truong MD & Reginald F. Munden DMD, MD

Authors
  1. Mylene T. Truong MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reginald F. Munden DMD, MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Truong, M.T., Munden, R.F. Lung cancer screening. Curr Oncol Rep 5, 309–312 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-003-0072-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-003-0072-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation