Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neurohospitalists: An Emerging Subspecialty

  • Critical Care (SA Mayer, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Akin to the rapid growth in hospitalist medicine seen in the prior decade, there has been a recent explosion in the need for neurohospitalists. Factors driving this demand include nationally mandated quality and safety measures, the increasing complexity and age of the hospitalized patient, and diminished training in diagnosis and management of neurological illnesses for internal medicine residents. The role of the neurohospitalist is varied and may include not only providing neurological care to hospitalized patients but also serving as a leader in an institution’s push to meet quality and safety measures. Close collaboration with intensivists, vascular neurologists, and outpatient neurologists is both a challenge and essential for successful delivery of care both during hospitalization and after discharge. Future challenges facing neurohospitalists include defining its relationship to other fields, instituting a pathway for certification, and conducting research to guide the development of evidence-based practice and quality measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Wachter RM. Reflections: the hospitalist movement a decade later. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(4):248–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cors WK, Rohr R. The “ist” explosion: driving forces, current trends and future directions for hospitalists. Physician Exec. 2010;36(3):12–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freeman WD, Josephson SA. The birth of neurohospitalists. The Neurohospitalist. 2011;1(1):5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. • Josephson SA, Engstrom JW, Wachter RM. Neurohospitalists: an emerging model for inpatient neurological care. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(2):135–40. One of the original articles describing the forces leading to development of the neurohospitalist field, including the founding author of the hospitalist movement Dr. Wachter.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Likosky DJ. Is it time for neurohospitalists? Neurology. 2009;72(9):859. author reply 859–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Avitzur O. Neurohospitalists: a new term for a new breed of neurologist. Neurol Today. 2005;5(10):44–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. •• Likosky DJ. If not neurohospitalists, who? If not now, when? The Neurohospitalist. 2011;1(2):64–6. Overviews the current state of the neurohospitalist field, with a very realistic discussion of updated issues, challenges, and recommendations for furthur establishing this field.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. • Likosky DJ, Shulman S, Restrepo L, Freeman WD. Survey of neurohospitalists: subspecialty definition and practice characteristics. Front Neurol. 2010;1(9):1–4. This is the only survey of neurohospitalists derived from the American Academy of Neurology Neurohospitalist Section; it consists of questions sent to 93 recipients regarding their neurohospitalist practice, with a 54 % response rate.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman WD, Gronseth F, Eidelman BH. Invited article: is it time for neurohospitalists? Neurology. 2008;70(15):1282–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Chang I. Structural Issues for Neurohospitalists. In: Josephson SA, Freeman WD, Likosky DJ, editors. Neurohospitalist medicine. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 2011. p. 213–23. This is a new authoritative textbook of neurologic disease states focused on inpatient management with a chapter devoted to structural and organizational issues of scheduling, financial compensation, and organizational considerations for neurohospitalists.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. • Douglas VC, Josephson SA. A proposed roadmap for inpatient neurology quality indicators. The Neurohospitalist. 2011;1(1):8–15. This article is a good start to developing quality goals for inpatient neurological diagnoses; it is based on review of all current evidence-based guidelines for the most commonly encountered inpatient neurological diagnoses at the authors’ institution.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McGinn T, Centor R. Where should hospitalist programs be housed? J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(8):1288–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McMahon Jr LF. The hospitalist movement—time to move on. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(25):2627–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Threlkeld RC. Opportunities and challenges in physician employment at a hospital or its affiliates. J Med Assoc Ga. 2008;97(3):33–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Archambault D. Despite advantages, perks fewer physicians work as employees. Mich Med. 2004;103(4):9–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Foa R. Reflections on the end of a practice: lessons learned. Neurol Today. 2010;10(16):4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Barrett KM, Biller J, Czartoski T, et al. Neurohospitalist section strategic plan. Proceedings from the American Academy of Neurology; Neurohospitalist Section. Toronto, Canada; April 2010.

  18. • Freeman WD. Neurohospitalists reduce length of stay for patients with ischemic stroke. The Neurohospitalist. 2011;1(2):67–70. This is a study of 533 patients that demonstrate improved adherence to quality metrics in stroke and reduced LOS with a neurohospitalist program.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amin A, Likosky DK. The role of hospitalists in the acute care of stroke patients. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2010;12(3):240–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Manno EM. Neurohospitalists: challenges for the integration of a new field: a neurointensivist’s perspective. Front Neurol. 2010;1:154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zakaria A, Provenicio JJ, Lopez GA. Emerging subspecialties in neurology: neurocritical care. Neurology. 2008;70(15):1282–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogove H. The intensivist and the hospitalist: defining responsibility. Hospitalist. 1999;3(4):10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murin S. Hospitalists in the intensive care unit: an intensivist perspective. Hospitalist. 1999;3(4):5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang CW, Torbey MT, Diringer MN, et al. Neurointensivists: part of the problem or part of the solution? Crit Care Med. 2008;36(4):1350–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwamm LH, Audebert HJ, Amarenco P, et al. Recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine within stroke systems of care. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2635–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Douglas VC. A message from the editor in chief. The Neurohospitalist. 2011;1(1):4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. American Heart Association: Get With the Guidelines. Available at http://www.americanheart.org/HEARTORG/HealthcareResearch/GetWithTheGuidelinesHFStroke/GetWithTheGuidelinesStrokeHomePage. Accessed Sept 2011.

  28. •• Meschia JF. Grand challenge: the emerging field of neurohospitalist medicine. Front Neurol. 2010;1:8. This is an opinion article that introduces Frontiers in Hospitalist Neurology, a new peer-reviewed journal, and discusses current and future directions for the neurohospitalist field.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152(9):1423–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Roter DL. Physician/patient communication: transmission of information and patient effects. Md State Med J. 1983;32(4):260–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(2):121–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Coleman EA, Smith JD, Raha D, et al. Posthospital medication discrepancies: prevalence and contributing factors. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(16):1842–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, et al. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297(8):831–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Coleman E, Williams M. Executing high-quality care transitions: a call to do it right. Editorial. J Hosp Med. 2007;2(5):287–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Snow V, Beck D. Transitions of care consensus policy statement: American College of Physicians, Society of General Internal Medicine, Society of Hospital Medicine, American Geriatrics Society, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2009;4(6):364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. • Barrett KM, Fowler MV. Is fellowship training necessary for neurohospitalists? The Neurohospitalist. 2011;1(3):125–7. This is an interesting article that highlights opposing viewpoints regarding the need for developing dedicated fellowships in neurohospitalist medicine.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Conflicts of interest: I. Chang: is a member in both the Neurocritical Care Society and Neurohospitalist Society; R.W. Pratt: none.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ira Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, I., Pratt, R.W. Neurohospitalists: An Emerging Subspecialty. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 12, 481–488 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-012-0273-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-012-0273-8

Keywords

Navigation