Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

After curative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), routine colonoscopies are recommended. We aimed to identify all studies of ethnic disparities in CRC surveillance and examine any association between race/ethnicity and colonoscopy use.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature review to address the association between race/ethnicity and colonoscopy use among CRC survivors. We searched Medline for relevant articles. Two authors reviewed titles, abstracts, and articles based on pre-determined inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Results

Of the 1,544 titles reviewed, eight studies published since 2001 investigated racial/ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use. Four articles showed a small significant ethnic disparity in the receipt of timely colonoscopy, and the remaining four articles showed a nonsignificant trend in the same direction. The effect did not vary by time of diagnosis or proportion of minorities in each study, though studies with larger samples showed somewhat greater racial/ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use.

Conclusions

We found at least a small disparity in the use of colonoscopy among CRC survivors, suggesting that ethnic disparities continue beyond prevention, detection, and treatment of CRC. It is important to identify areas of unequal care in CRC survivorship and to promote timely surveillance among CRC survivors who belong to racial/ethnic minorities to decrease disparities in mortality.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

CRC survivors who belong to racial/ethnic minorities may be less likely to receive follow-up colonoscopies on time, which could contribue to higher rates of death from CRC among minorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Fort Washington: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc.; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Fort Washington: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc.; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Fort Washington: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc.; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anthony T, Simmang C, Hyman N, et al. Practice parameters for the surveillance and follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(6):807–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Desch CE, Benson 3rd AB, Somerfield MR, et al. Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(33):8512–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterol. 2006;130(6):1865–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper GS, Kou TD, Reynolds Jr HL. Receipt of guideline-recommended follow-up in older colorectal cancer survivors: a population-based analysis. Cancer. 2008;113(8):2029–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper GS, Payes JD. Temporal trends in colorectal procedure use after colorectal cancer resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(6):933–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Chak A, et al. Geographic and patient variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of follow-up testing after surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;85(10):2124–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellison GL, Warren JL, Knopf KB, et al. Racial differences in the receipt of bowel surveillance following potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(6 Pt 2):1885–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Elston LJ, Cole JC, Ben-Menachem T, et al. Sociodemographic differences in the receipt of colorectal cancer surveillance care following treatment with curative intent. Med Care. 2001;39(4):361–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elston LJ, Simpkins J, Schultz L, et al. Routine surveillance care after cancer treatment with curative intent. Med Care. 2005;43(6):592–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilsden RJ, Bryant HE, Sutherland LR, et al. A retrospective study on the use of post-operative colonoscopy following potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province. BMC Cancer. 2004;4:14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Knopf KB, Warren JL, Feuer EJ, et al. Bowel surveillance patterns after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Medicare beneficiaries. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54(5):563–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rolnick S, Hensley Alford S, Kucera GP, et al. Racial and age differences in colon examination surveillance following a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;35:96–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rulyak SJ, Mandelson MT, Brentnall TA, et al. Clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with colon surveillance among patients with a history of colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59(2):239–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Salz T, Weinberger M, Ayanian JZ, et al. Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ries LAG, Horner MJ, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Feuer EJ, Huang L, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Lewis DR, Eisner MP, Stinchcomb DG, Edwards BK, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975–2006. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cooper GS, Koroukian SM. Racial disparities in the use of and indications for colorectal procedures in Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2004;100(2):418–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Doubeni CA, Laiyemo AO, Klabunde CN, et al. Racial and ethnic trends of colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(2):184–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ball JK, Elixhauser A. Treatment differences between blacks and whites with colorectal cancer. Med Care. 1996;34(9):970–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Chak A, et al. Patterns of endoscopic follow-up after surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52(1):33–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cooper GS, Koroukian SM. Geographic variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of colorectal carcinoma screening procedures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(8):1544–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Landefeld CS, et al. Surgery for colorectal cancer: race-related differences in rates and survival among Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(4):582–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hao Y, Landrine H, Jemal A, et al. Race, neighbourhood characteristics and disparities in chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(3):211–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mayberry RM, Coates RJ, Hill HA, et al. Determinants of black/white differences in colon cancer survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(22):1686–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shavers VL, Brown ML. Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(5):334–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Green CR, Anderson KO, Baker TA, et al. The unequal burden of pain: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in pain. Pain Med. 2003;4(3):277–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in translation. Washington, D.C: Institute of Medicine and National Research Council; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Earle CC, Neville BA. Under use of necessary care among cancer survivors. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1712–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Findley PA, Sambamoorthi U. Preventive health services and lifestyle practices in cancer survivors: a population health investigation. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3(1):43–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, D.C: Institute of Medicine and National Research Council; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Salz T, Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS, et al. Survivorship care plans in research and practice. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(2):101–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Burg MA, Lopez ED, Dailey A, et al. The potential of survivorship care plans in primary care follow-up of minority breast cancer patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:S467–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

NIH site grant number 5R21CA137434-01A1, PI DuHamel

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talya Salz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salz, T., Woo, H., Starr, T.D. et al. Ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 6, 372–378 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0231-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0231-0

Keywords

Navigation