Skip to main content
Log in

Biliopancreatic Diversion-Duodenal Switch: Independent Contributions of Sleeve Resection and Duodenal Exclusion

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The choice of first-stage operation in bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) is controversial. There are no published long-term comparisons of one- and two-stage BPD-DS outcomes.

Methods

During 2001–2009, among 1,762 patients scheduled for BPD-DS 48 had duodenal switch (DS) and 53 sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as first-stage procedures. We compared prospectively updated outcomes of 42 DS (100 % open) and 49 SG (88 % laparoscopic), 13 of whom completed their second stage, to a control group of 91 patients with open one-stage BPD-DS.

Results

One-year mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was greater after SG than DS (47 ± 19 vs. 39 ± 13 SD; p = 0.01) with earlier nadir (16 ± 10 vs. 45 ± 30 months; p < 0.0001) but more rapid significant weight regain. After 5 years, %EWL was 12 ± 35 for 9 SG, 45 ± 19 for 30 DS (p < 0.0006), and 70 ± 18 for the first-stage BPD-DS (p < 0.0001). Weight loss was less after two- than one-stage procedures (p < 0.02). Comorbidities improved progressively between SG, DS and BPD-DS (p < 0.001 for trend). HbA1C decreased by 10, 19, and 31 %, respectively (p < 0.0001). Dyslipidemia was cured in 41, 82, and 100 %, respectively. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased only after DS (12 %; p < 0.0002). Patient satisfaction was similar for SG and DS but greater after BPD-DS overall (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

SG and DS independently contribute to beneficial metabolic outcomes after BPD-DS. Long-term weight loss and correction of metabolic abnormalities were better after DS favoring its use as first stage in BPD-DS; one-stage BPD-DS outcomes were superior to two-staged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scopinaro N, Gianetta E, Civalleri D, et al. Bilio-pancreatic bypass for obesity: II. Initial experience in man. Br J Surg. 1979;66:618–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scopinaro N, Gianetta E, Civalleri D, et al. Biliopancreatic bypass for obesity. An experimental study in dogs. Br J Surg. 1979;66:613–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarson D, Scopinaro N, Bloom SR. Gut hormone changes after jejunoileal (JIB) or biliopancreatic (BPD) bypass surgery for morbid obesity. Int J Obes. 1981;5:471–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adami GF, Campostano A, Bissarione D, et al. Resting energy expenditure in long-term post obese subjects after weight normalisation by dieting or biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg. 1993;3:397–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scopinaro N, Adami GF, Marinari GM, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion. World J Surg. 1998;22:936–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Scopinaro N, Marinari M, Camerini G, et al. Energy and nitrogen absorption after biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg. 2000;10:436–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8:267–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marceau P, Biron S, Bourque RA, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with a new type of gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 1993;3:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marceau P, Hould FS, Simard S, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. World J Surg. 1998;22:947–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ren JC, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early Results of Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003;13:861–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gagner M, Chu C, Quinn T et al. Two-stage laparoscopic diversion with duodenal switch: an alternative approach to super-super morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2003.

  13. Moy J, Pomp A, Dakin G, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Am J Surg. 2008;196:e56–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Deitel M, Crosby RD, Gagner M. The first International Consensus Summit for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), New York City, October 25–27, 2007. Obes Surg. 2008; 487-96.

  15. ASBS Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2010; 6: 1-5.

  16. Rosenthal RJ. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel consensus statement best practice guidelines. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marceau P, Biron S, Hould FS, et al. Obesity surgery principles and practice. In: Pitombo C, Jones K, Higa K, Pariza J, editors. Malabsorptiveprocedures: duodenal switch; Chapitre 14. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008. p. 131–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deitel M. Surgery for the morbidly obese patients. 1998 FD Communication Inc., Toronto p.73-74.

  19. Junquero D, Rival Y. Metabolic syndrome which definition for what treatment. Medicine/Sciences. 2005;21:1045–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cossu ML, Noya G, Tonolo GC, et al. Duodenal switch without gastric resection: results and observation after 6 years. Obes Surg. 2004;14:1354–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long -term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252:319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bohdjalian A, Langer FB, Shakeri-Leidenmuhler S, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy as sole and definitive bariatric procedure: 5-year results for weight loss and ghrelin. Obes Surg. 2010;20:535–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarela AI, Dexter SP, O’kane M, et al. Long-term follow up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 8–9 years results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:679–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kehagias I, Spyropoulos C, Karamanakos S, et al. Efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy as sole procedure in patients with clinically severe obesity (BMI ≤50 kg/m2). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;9(3):363–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rawlins L, Rawlins MP, Brown CC, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes of a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:21–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Diamantis T, Apostolou KG, Alexandrou A, et al. Review of long-term weight loss results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:177–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy—influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1297–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Garrido-Sanchez L, Murri M, Rivas-Becerra J, et al. Bypass of the duodenum improves insulin resistance much more rapidly than sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:145–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1577–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Klein S, Fabbrini E, Patterson BW, et al. Moderate effect of duodenal-jejunal bypass surgery on glucose homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Obesity. 2012;20:1266–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Marceau P, Biron S, Hould FS, et al. Liver pathology and the metabolic syndrome X in severe obesity. J Clin Endoc Metab. 1999;84:1513–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kral JG, Thung SN, Biron S, et al. Effects of surgical treatment of the metabolic syndrome on liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Surgery. 2004;135:48–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Buchwald H, Kellogg TA, Leslie DB, et al. Duodenal switch operative mortality and morbidly are not impacted by body mass index. Ann Surg. 2008;248:541–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Biertho L, Lebel S, Marceau S, et al. Perioperative complications in a consecutive series of 1000 duodenal switches. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:63–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Silecchia G, Rizzello M, Casella G, et al. Two-stage laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch as treatment of high-risk super-obese patients: analysis of complications. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1032–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Topart P, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by duodenal switch in selected patients versus single-stage duodenal switch for superobesity: case control study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:531–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Paule Marceau research Assistant and databank coordinator for her major contribution in the realization of this manuscript.

Disclosure

The authors have no commercial associations that might be a conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Picard Marceau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marceau, P., Biron, S., Marceau, S. et al. Biliopancreatic Diversion-Duodenal Switch: Independent Contributions of Sleeve Resection and Duodenal Exclusion. OBES SURG 24, 1843–1849 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1284-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1284-0

Keywords

Navigation