Abstract
In budding yeast, elements of a single MAP Kinase cascade are shared to regulate a wide range of functions such as mating, differentiation and osmotic stress. However, cells have programmed to execute correct event in response to a given input signal without cross activating other responses. Studies have observed that magnitude and duration of MAPK activation encodes specificity. Similarly, the differential regulation of Tec1p, a transcriptional activator of invasive growth gene, FLO11 by MAP kinases has been observed to bring specificity in mating and invasive growth signaling. However, the understanding of interactions between the shared components and other signaling pathways related to the phenotypic response in contributing towards specificity remains unclear. We specifically address the crosstalk of cAMP pathway with MAPK pathway in haploid invasive growth and show the contribution and importance of cAMP pathway towards invasive growth irrespective of the activation status of MAPK pathway. Our analysis shows that crosstalk from cAMP pathway in haploids might offer an advantage in terms of amplifying the observed weak signaling through MAPK pathway. Further, we show that such a crosstalk in haploids leads to higher FLO11 expression than diploids. We also demonstrate the positive and negative role of Tpk1 and Tpk3 in haploid invasive growth. Finally, we observe that a cross-inhibition at gene level brought about by cAMP pathway controlled inhibitor, Sfl1, perhaps help in deamplifying the MAPK signal and also in preventing FLO11 expression in the absence of cAMP pathway activation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arkinstall SJ, Papasavvas SG, Payton MA (1991) Yeast alpha-mating factor receptor-linked G-protein signal transduction suppresses Ras-dependent activity. FEBS Lett 284:123–128
Bao MZ, Schwartz MA, Cantin GT, Yates JR, Madhani HD (2004) Pheromone-dependent destruction of the Tec1 transcription factor is required for MAP kinase signaling specificity in yeast. Cell 119:991–1000
Bardwell L, Cook JG, Inouye CJ, Thorner J (1994) Signal propagation and regulation in the mating pheromone response pathway of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Dev Biol 166:363–379
Bardwell L (2005) A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway. Peptides 26:337–350
Braus GH, Grundmann O, Bruckner S, Mosch HU (2003) Amino acid starvation and Gcn4p regulate adhesive growth and FLO11 gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 14:4272–4284
Bruckner S, Kohler T, Braus GH, Heise B, Bolte M, Mesch HU (2004) Differential regulation of Tec1 by Fus3 and Kss1 confers signaling specificity in yeast development. Curr Genet 46:331–342
Conlan RS, Tzamarias D (2001) Sfl1 functions via the co-repressor Ssn6-Tup1 and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase Tpk2. J Mol Biol 309:1007–1015
Cullen PJ, Sprague GF (2000) Glucose depletion causes haploid invasive growth in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13619–13624
Elion EA, Qi MS, Chen WD (2005) Signaling specificity in yeast. Science 307:687–688
Erdman S, Snyder M (2001) A filamentous growth response mediated by the yeast mating pathway. Genetics 159:919–928
Fields S, Herskowitz I (1987) Regulation by the Yeast Mating-Type Locus of Ste12, a Gene Required for Cell-Type-Specific Expression. Mol Cell Biol 7:3818–3821
Fischer G (2005) Regulation of Flo11p-dependent adhesion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, dissertation. Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August-Universität, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
Flatauer LJ, Zadeh SF, Bardwell L (2005) Mitogen-activated protein kinases with distinct requirements for Ste5 scaffolding influence signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 25:1793–1803
Fleming AB, Pennings S (2001) Antagonistic remodelling by Swi-Snf and Tup1-Ssn6 of an extensive chromatin region forms the background for FLO1 gene regulation. EMBO J 20:5219–5231
Gagiano M, Bauer FF, Pretorius IS (2002) The sensing of nutritional status and the relationship to filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2:433–470
Gimeno CJ, Ljungdahl PO, Styles CA, Fink GR (1992) Unipolar Cell Divisions in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae lead to Filamentous Growth - Regulation by Starvation and Ras. Cell 68:1077–1090
Koshland Jr DE, Goldbeter A, Stock JB (1982) Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems. Science 217:220–225
Liu HP, Styles CA, Fink GR (1993) Elements of the Yeast Pheromone Response Pathway Required for Filamentous Growth of Diploids. Science 262:1741–1744
Liu HP, Styles CA, Fink GR (1996) Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C has a mutation in FLO8 a gene required for filamentous growth. Genetics 144:967–978
Lo WS, Dranginis AM (1998) The cell surface flocculin Flo11 is required for pseudohyphae formation and invasion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 9:161–171
Lorenz M C, Heitman J (1997) Yeast pseudohyphal growth is regulated by GPA2, a G protein a homolog. EMBO J 16:7008–7018
Madhani HD, Fink GR (1997) Combinatorial control required for the specificity of yeast MAPK signaling. Science 275:1314–1317
Mosch HU, Roberts RL, Fink GR (1996) Ras2 signals via the Cdc42/Ste20/mitogen-activated protein kinase module to induce filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:5352–5356
Mosch HU, Kubler E, Krappmann S, Fink GR., Braus GH (1999) Crosstalk between the Ras2p-controlled mitogen-activated protein kinase and cAMP pathways during invasive growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 10:1325–1335
Neelajan S, Vinod PK, Venkatesh KV (2007) Crosstalk between cAMP-PKA and MAP kinase pathways is a key regulatory design necessary to regulate FLO11 expression. Biophys Chem 125:59–71
Nelson C, Goto S, Lund K, Hung W, Sadowski I (2003) Srb10/Cdk8 regulates yeast filamentous growth by phosphorylating the transcription factor Ste12. Nature 421:187–190
Palecek SP, Parikh AS, Kron SJ (2002) Sensing, signalling and integrating physical processes during Saccharomyces cerevisiae invasive and filamentous growth. Microbiology 148:893–907
Pan XW, Heitman J (1999) Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase regulates pseudohyphal differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19:4874–4887
Pan X, Heitman J (2002) Protein Kinase A operates a molecular switch that governs yeast Pseudohyphal differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 22:3981–3993
Papasavvas S, Arkinstall S, Reid J, Payton M (1992) Yeast Alpha-Mating Factor Receptor and G-Protein-Linked Adenylyl Cyclase Inhibition Requires Ras2 and Gpa2 Activities. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 184:1378–1385
Pingsheng M, Stefan W, Patrick VD, Thevelein JM (1999) The PDE1-encoded low-affinity phosphodiesterase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a specific function in controlling agonist-induced cAMP signaling. Mol Biol Cell 10:91–104
Roberts RL, Fink GR (1994) Elements of a Single Map Kinase Cascade in Saccharomyces-Cerevisiae Mediate 2 Developmental Programs in the Same Cell-Type - Mating and Invasive Growth. Genes Dev 8:2974–2985
Robertson LS, Fink GR (1998) The three yeast A kinases have specific signaling functions in pseudohyphal growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13783– 13787
Rupp S, Summers E, Lo HJ, Madhani H, Fink G (1999) MAP kinase and cAMP filamentation signaling pathways converge on the unusually large promoter of the yeast FLO11 gene. EMBO J 18:1257–1269
Sabbagh W, Flatauer LJ, Bardwell AJ, Bardwell L (2001) Specificity of MAP kinase signaling in yeast differentiation involves transient versus sustained MAPK activation. Mol Cell 8:683–691
Schwartz MA, Madhani HD (2004) Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ann Rev Genet 38:725–748
Acknowledgements
K.V.Venkatesh acknowledges financial support from the Swarnajayanti fellowship, Department of Science and Technology, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vinod, P.K., Venkatesh, K.V. Specificity of MAPK signaling towards FLO11 expression is established by crosstalk from cAMP pathway. Syst Synth Biol 1, 99–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11693-007-9007-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11693-007-9007-7