Skip to main content
Log in

Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors’ Perceptions About Student Interest in Internal Medicine Careers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Experienced medical student educators may have insight into the reasons for declining interest in internal medicine (IM) careers, particularly general IM.

Objective

To identify factors that, according to IM clerkship directors, influence students’ decisions for specialty training in IM.

Design

Cross-sectional national survey.

Participants

One hundred ten institutional members of Clerkship Directors in IM.

Measurements

Frequency counts and percentages were reported for descriptive features of clerkships, residency match results, and clerkship directors’ perceptions of factors influencing IM career choice at participating schools. Perceptions were rated on a five-point scale (1 = very much pushes students away from IM careers; 5 = very much attracts students toward IM careers).

Results

Survey response rate was 83/110 (76%); 80 answered IM career-choice questions. Clerkship directors identified three educational items attracting students to IM careers: quality of IM faculty (mean score 4.3, SD = 0.56) and IM rotation (4.1, SD = 0.67), and experiences with IM residents (3.9, SD = 0.94). Items felt most strongly to push students away from IM careers were current practice environment for internists (mean score 2.1, SD = 0.94), income (2.1, SD = 1.08), medical school debt (2.3, SD = 0.89), and work hours in IM (2.4, SD = 1.05). Factor analysis indicated three factors explaining students’ career choices: value/prestige of IM, clerkship experience, and exposure to internists.

Conclusions

IM clerkship directors believe that IM clerkship experiences attract students toward IM, whereas the income and lifestyle for practicing internists dissuade them. These results suggest that interventions to enhance the practice environment for IM could increase student interest in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bodenheimer T. Primary care-will it survive? N Engl J Med. 2006;355(9):861–864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sox HC. Leaving (internal) medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(1):57–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. NRMP. Advance Data Tables for 2007 Main Residency Match. In: National Resident Matching Program; 2007.

  4. Hirshfeld J Jr., Fye WB. Summary of Task Force recommendations to address the growing shortage of cardiologists. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(2):272–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hortobagyi GN. A shortage of oncologists? The American Society of Clinical Oncology workforce study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(12):1468–1469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cravens DD, Campbell JD, Mehr DR. Why geriatrics? Academic geriatricians’ perceptions of the positive, attractive aspects of geriatrics. Fam Med. 2000;32(1):34–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwartz MD, Linzer M, Babbott D, Divine GW, Broadhead WE. The impact of an ambulatory rotation on medical student interest in internal medicine. The Society of General Internal Medicine Task Force on Career Choice in Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(10):542–549.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bauer RL, Venkatachalam HM, Forrester RH, Harris GD, Diehl AK. The effect of an ambulatory internal medicine rotation on students’ career choices. Acad Med. 1997;72(2):147–149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arora V, Wetterneck TB, Schnipper JL, et al. Effect of the inpatient general medicine rotation on student pursuit of a generalist career. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(5):471–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis BE, Nelson DB, Sahler OJ, McCurdy FA, Goldberg R, Greenberg LW. Do clerkship experiences affect medical students’ attitudes toward chronically ill patients? Acad Med. 2001;76(8):815–820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wetterneck TB, Linzer M, McMurray JE, et al. Worklife and satisfaction of general internists. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(6):649–656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitcomb ME, Cohen JJ. The future of primary care medicine. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(7):710–712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorsey ER, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW. Influence of controllable lifestyle on recent trends in specialty choice by US medical students. JAMA. 2003;290(9):1173–1178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weinberger SE, Smith LG, Collier VU. Redesigning training for internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(12):927–932.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hauer KE, Alper EJ, Clayton CP, Hershman WY, Whelan AJ, Woolliscroft JO. Educational responses to declining student interest in internal medicine careers. Am J Med. 2005;118(10):1164–11670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Margo K, Fincher, RE, Espey, E. The role of the clerkship director. In: Fincher RE, ed. Guidebook for Clerkship Directors, 3rd Edition. Alliance for Clinical Education; 2005.

  17. Schwartz MD, Linzer M, Babbott D, Divine GW, Broadhead E. Medical student interest in internal medicine. Initial report of the Society of General Internal Medicine Interest Group Survey on Factors Influencing Career Choice in Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(1):6–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stevens J. Principal Components. In: Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers; 1986.

  19. Medical school graduation questionnaire. Association of American Medical Colleges, 2006. (Accessed April 14, 2008, at http://www.aamc.org/data/gq/allschoolsreports/).

  20. Wright S, Wong A, Newill C. The impact of role models on medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(1):53–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenblatt RA, Andrilla CH. The impact of U.S. medical students’ debt on their choice of primary care careers: an analysis of data from the 2002 medical school graduation questionnaire. Acad Med. 2005;80(9):815–819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore G, Showstack J. Primary care medicine in crisis: toward reconstruction and renewal. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):244–247.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(7):441–450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ricer RE, Van Horne A, Filak AT. Costs of preceptors’ time spent teaching during a third-year family medicine outpatient rotation. Acad Med. 1997;72(6):547–551.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine Research Committee and staff, and Patricia O’Sullivan, EdD, for statistical assistance.

Funding Support

The Shadyside Hospital Foundation of Pittsburgh, PA, and the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation.

Conflict of interest statement

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen E. Hauer MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hauer, K.E., Fagan, M.J., Kernan, W. et al. Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors’ Perceptions About Student Interest in Internal Medicine Careers. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 1101–1104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0640-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0640-y

Key Words

Navigation