Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Campanophyllum: A new genus for an old species name

  • Published:
Mycological Progress Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Campanophyllum is proposed as a new genus name to accommodate Lentinus proboscideus Fries, based on morphological and molecular data from collections made in Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador and Mexico. A neotype specimen is designated. The taxonomic circumscription of the new genus is compared to those of a wide array of agaric genera having cyphelloid, pseudostipitate members. Based on ribosomal large subunit DNA data, Campanophyllum appears to be placed in the “/gloeostereae” clade where it is nested with Cheimonophyllum, Chondrostereum and Gloeostereum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruns TD, M. Gardes M (1993) Molecular tools for the identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi—taxon-specific oligonucleotide probes for suilloid fungi. — Molecular Ecology 2: 233–242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson JE, Tulsieram LK, Glaubitz JC, Luk VMK, Kauffeldt C, Rutledge R (1991) Segregation of random amplified DNA markers in F1 progeny of conifers. — Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83: 194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes BJ, Villegas RM, Perez Ramirez L (1986) Hongos. In Lot A, Chiang F (eds) Manual de Herbario. Consejo Nacional de la Flora de México, A.C., México D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner EJH (1981) The genera Lentinus, Panus, and Pleurotus. — Beihefte Nova Hedwigia 69: 1–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gcg (2000) Genetics Computer Group Program Manual, Version 10.0. Oxford Molecular Group Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halling R (1986) An Annotated Index to Species and Infraspecific Taxa of Agaricales and Boletales Described by William A. Murril. — Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 40: 1–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbett DS (1992) Towards a phylogenetic classification for shiitake: taxonomic history and molecular perspectives. — Reports of the Tottori Mycological Institute 30: 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbett DS, Hansen K, Donoghue MJ (1998) Phylogeny and biogeography of Lentinula inferred from an expanded rDNA dataset. — Mycological Research 102: 1041–1049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbett DS, Thorn RG (1994) Nematode-trapping in Pleurotus tuberregium. — Mycologia 86: 696–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbett DS, Vilgalys R (1993) Phylogenetic relationships of Lentinus (Basidiomycotina) inferred from molecular and morphological characters. — Systematic Botany 18: 409–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horak E (1968) Synopsis generum Agaricalium (Die Gattungstypen der Agaricales). Beiträge Kryptogam. Schweiz 13. Kommisionsverlag Druckerei Büchler + CoAG, Wabern-Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin JK, Hughes KW, Petersen RH (2001a) Phylogenetic relationships of Panellus (Agaricales) and related species based on morphology and ribosomal large subunit DNA sequences. — Mycotaxon 79: 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin JK, Hughes KW, Petersen RH (2001b) Biogeographical patterns in Panellus stypticus. — Mycologia 93: 309–316.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kornerup A, Wanscher JF (1973) Methuen Handbook of Color. 3rd. ed. Methuen & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühner R (1980) Les grandes lignes de la classification des Agaricales, Pluteales, Tricholomatales(suite). — Bulletin de la Société Linneenne de Lyon 49: 232–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson E (2002) Phylogeny of corticioid fungi with russuloid characteristics. Ph. D. dissertation, Göteborg University, Faculty of Science, Göteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Largent L, Johnson D, Watling R (1977) How to Identify Mushrooms to Genus, I. Microscopic Features. Mad River Press, Eureka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata JL, Petersen RH, Hughes KW (2001) The genus Lentinula in the Americas. — Mycologia 93: 1102–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller AN, Methven AS (2000) Biological species concepts in eastern North American populations of Lentinellus. — Mycologia 92: 792–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncalvo JM, Lutzoni FM, Rehner SR, Johnson J, Vilgalys R (2000) Phylogenetic relationships of agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. — Systematic Biology 49: 278–305.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA, Johnson JE, James TY, Aime MC, Hofstetter V, Verduin SJW, Larsson E, Baroni TJ, Thorn RG, Jacobsson S, Clemençon H, Miller OK (2002) One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. — Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 357–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau PA, Roux P, Mascarell G (1999) Une étude du genre Lentinellus Karst. en Europe. — Bulletin Trimestriel de la Société Mycolgique de France 115: 229–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munsell (1998) Munsell Soil Color Charts. GretagMacbeth, New Windsor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmasto E (1981) On the Asian species of the genus Campanella (Tricholomataceae: Collybiae). — Nova Hedwigia 34: 437–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegler DN (1983a) Agaric Flora of the Lesser Antilles. — Kew Bulletin, additional series 9: 1–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegler DN (1983b) The genus Lentinus. — Kew Bull., additional series 10: 1–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen RH (1997) Mating systems in hymenomycetes: new reports and taxonomic implications. — Mycotaxon 63: 225–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen RH, Gordon SA (1994) Mating systems in hymenomycetes: new reports and new species. — Mycologia 86: 743–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen RH, Krise-Greilhuber I (1999) Type specimen studies in Pleurotus. — Persoonia 17: 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen RH, Nicholl DBG, Hughes KW (1997) Mating systems of some putative polypore-agaric relatives. — Plant Systematics and Evolution 207: 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen RH, Parmasto E (1993) A redescription of Gloeostereum incarnatum. — Mycological Research 97: 1213–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen RH, Ridley GS (1996) A New Zealand Pleurotus with multiple-species sexual compatibilities. — Mycologia 88: 198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine EM, Hibbett DS, Donoghue MJ (1999) Phylogenetic relationships of cantharelloid and clavarioid Homobasidiomycetes based on mitochondrial and nuclear rDNA sequences. — Mycologia 96: 944–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgway YR (1912) Color Standards and Color Nomenclature. RidgwayWashington, DC.

  • Segedin BP (1993) Studies in the Agaricales of New Zeland: Some new and revised species of Campanella (Tricholomataceae: Collybieae). — New Zealand Journal of Botany 31: 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1944) New genera of Fungi. — Mycologia 36: 358–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1973) Synopsis fungorum novorum Agaricalium. III. — Beih. Sydowia 7: 1–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer R (1986) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigsten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2001) PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorn RG, Barron GL (1986) Nematoctonus and the tribe Resupinatae in Ontario, Canada. — Mycotaxon 25: 321–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorn RG, Montcalvo JM, Reddy CA, Vilgalys R (2000) Phylogenetic analysis and the distribution of nematophagy support a monophyletic Pleurotaceae within the polyphyletic pleurotoid-lentinoid fungi. — Mycologia 92: 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis, M.A., D.H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky and T. J. White Eds. PCR Protocols, pp. 315–322. Academic Press, Inc. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun W, Xie Z, Yan Y (1988) Taxonomy, ecology and distribution of Gloeostereum incarnatum. Zhongguo Shiyongjun 1988(6): 23–24. [Chinese, with English summary]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Ciencias UNAM, A.P. 70-399, Herbario FCME, México, D.F. 04510, México

    Joaquín Cifuentes

  2. Department of Botany, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996-1100, USA

    Ronald H. Petersen & Karen Hughes

Authors
  1. Joaquín Cifuentes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald H. Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karen Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald H. Petersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cifuentes, J., Petersen, R.H. & Hughes, K. Campanophyllum: A new genus for an old species name. Mycol Progress 2, 285–295 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0066-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0066-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation