Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

IT applications portfolio management under business and implementation uncertainty

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporations need to improve business processes in order to enhance velocity and service levels while reducing their processing costs and differentiating themselves in the face of competition. The levitation of importance beyond support roles has raised IT investment decisions to high priority in chief executive officers’ agendas. Corporate planning groups as well as lines of business are increasingly applying techniques of IT applications portfolio management in a more systematic fashion to improve decision-making and resource-allocation processes.

Recent advances in software engineering and IT service delivery methodologies have achieved the logical separation of business functions from implementation. This separation has made a new breed of innovative IT project possible with a new project risk structure; the adjustment of portfolio management techniques is appropriate. We present an integrated portfolio management model so that the corporation can focus on organic growth through sources at both the department and top management levels. The research gives clear advice as to how top management can seek economic growth by selecting an entrepreneurial strategic posture, implying a strong risk-taking propensity. By integrating a risk-return model and risk-tolerance paradigm to cope with today’s risk structure, overall capabilities can improve the decision process and the corporation’s performance as well. The application of the integrated technique to a Japanese manufacturing firm is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler, R.W. (2000). Strategic investment decision appraisal techniques: the old and the new. Business Horizons, 43 (6): 15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amram, M. & Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real Options. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anand, J., Oriani, R. & Vassolo, R. (2006). Managing a portfolio of strategic growth options. Paper presented at the International Annual Conference of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.

  4. Aral, S. & Weill, P. (2004). IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: asset and capability-specific complementarities. CISR Working Paper No. 343, Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School, August

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benaroch, M. & Kauffman, R.J. (1999). A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments. Information Systems Research, 10 (1): 70–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benaroch, M. & Kauffman, R.J. (2000). Justifying electronics network expansion using real option analysis. MIS Quarterly, 24 (2): 197–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhaumik, K. (2003). Unleashing value through portfolio analysis-an offshore perspective. Cognizant Technology Solutions. Available via DIALOG. http://www.cognizant.com

  8. Black, F. & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81: 637–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Broadbent, M. & Weill, P. (1998). Leveraging the Infrastructure, How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. & Yang, S. (2002). Intangible assets: computers and organizational capital. Center for eBusiness at MIT Sloan School of Management

  11. Brynjolfsson, E. (1990). Information technology investments: guidelines for decision making. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7 (2): 9–28

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cornelius, P., Kogurt, B.M. (2003). Corporate governance in emerging markets: a key to competitiveness. World Economic Forum Knowledge Navigator. Available via DIALOG. http://www.weforum.org

  13. Copeland, T. & Antikarov, V. (2001). Real Options: A Practitioner’s Guide. TEXERE LLC, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dixit, A.K. & Pindyk, R.S. (1995). The options approach to capital investment. Harvard Business Review, May/June, 105–115

  15. Doherty, N. (2002). Integrated Risk Management: Techniques and Strategies for Reducing Risk. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Featherstone, A.M. & Moss, C.B. (1990). Quantifying gains to risk diversification using certainty equivalence in a mean-variance model: an application to florida citrus. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, December, 191–198

  17. Garcia, P., Adams, B.D. & Hauser, R.J. (1994). The use of mean-variance for commodity futures and options hedging decisions. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 19 (1): 32–45

    Google Scholar 

  18. Glass, R.L. (2005) IT failure rates — 70% or 10-15%? IEEE Software, May/June: 110–112

  19. IFPUG Counting Practices Manual, Release 4. (1995). International Function Point Users Group, Westerville, OH

  20. Irani, Z., Themistocleous, M. & Love, P.E. (2003). The impact of enterprise application integration on information system lifecycles. Information & Management, 41 (2): 177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. John, H. & Singer, M. (1991). Unbundling the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, March/April: 134–141.

  22. Jones, C. (1998). Estimating and Measuring SAP Applications with Function Point Metrics — Version 2, Feb 19. Software Productivity Research, Inc., Burlington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jones, C. (1991). Applied Software Measurement: Assuring Productivity and Quality. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, C. (2000). Software Assessments, Benchmarks, and Best Practices. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kauffman, R.J. & Li, X. (2004). Technology competition and optimal investment timing: a real options perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirkwood, C.W. (1997). Strategic Decision Making: Multi-objective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets. Duxbury Press, Belmont, Ca, ISBN 0-534-51692-0

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar, R.L. (1996). A note on project risk and option values of investments in information technologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13 (1): 187–193

    Google Scholar 

  28. Luenberger, D.G. (2002). A correlation pricing formula. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26: 1113–1126

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Margrabe, W. (1978). The value of an option to exchange one asset for another. Journal of Finance, 33: 177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Markowitz, H. (1991). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment, Second edition. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mason, R. & Weed, H. (2005). Can greater uncertainty hasten investment? University of Southampton working paper. Available via DIALOG. http://www.soton.ac.uk/~ram2

  32. McGrath, R.G. (1997). A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4): 974–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McGrath, R.G. & MacMillian, I.C. (2000). Assessing technology projects using real options reasoning. Research Technology Management, 43: 35–49

    Google Scholar 

  34. McDonald, R. & Siegel, D. (1986). The value of waiting to invest. NBER Working Paper No.1019. The Quarterly Journal of Economics

  35. McFahlen, F.W. (1981). Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Business Review, 79: 142–150

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mun, J. (2005). Real Options Analysis: Tools and Techniques for Valuing Strategic Investments and Decisions. Wiley.

  37. Oriani, R. (2006). Technology switch option and the market value of the firm: a model and an empirical test. Paper presented at the International Annual Conference of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA

  38. Passori, A. (2004). Selecting the risk assessment method of choice. META Delta 2911. Available via DIALOG. www.metagroup.com

  39. Peters, R.J. & Verhoef, C. (2008). Quantifying the yield of risk-bearing IT-portfolios. To appear in Science of Computer Programming. Available via DIALOG. http://www.cs.vu.nl/~x/yield/yield.pdf

  40. Raifa, H. (1968). Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  41. Renkema, T.J. (2000). The IT Value Quest: How to Capture the Business Value of IT-based Infrastructure. Wiley, Chichester, England

    Google Scholar 

  42. Reyck, B.D., Lockett, M., Grushka, B.Y., Moura, M. & Sloper, A.C. (2005). The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23: 574–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R.W. & Jeffe, J. (2002). Corporate Finance, 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rubinstein, D. (2007). Standish Group Report: There’s Less Development Chaos Today. Software Development Times.

  45. Schwartz, E.S. & Trigeorgis, L. (2001). Real Options and Investment under Uncertainty. MIT Press.

  46. Seacord, R.C., Plakosh, D. & Lewis, G.A. (2003). Modernizing Legacy Systems. Addison-Wesley.

  47. Smith, P.G. & Reinertsen, D.G. (1997). Developing Products in Half the Time: New Rules, New Tools, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons.

  48. Taft, D.K. (2003). MicroFocus moves mainframe apps to .Net. Available via DIALOG. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1372 573,00.asp Cited in August 2007

  49. Taudes, A., Feurstein, M. & Mild, A. (2000). Options analysis of software platform decisions: a case study. MIS Quarterly, 24 (2): 227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Torchiano, M. & Morislo, M. (2004). Overlooked aspects of COTS-based development. IEEE Software, March/April, 88-93

  51. Trigeorgis, L. (1995). Real option: an overview. In: Trigeorgis, L. (eds.) Real Options in Capital Investment: Models, Strategies, and Applications. Praeger Publishers.

  52. Trigeogis, L. (1996). Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  53. Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Interactions among multiple real options. In: Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation, Chapter 7. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  54. Uhlrich, W.M. (2002). Legacy Systems Transformation Strategies. Prentice Hall.

  55. Verhoef, C. (2005). Quantifying the value of IT-investments. Science of Computer Programming, 56: 315–342

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. Verhoef, C. (2002). Quantitative IT portfolio management. Science of Computer Programming, 45: 1–96

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Walls, M.R. (2004). Combining decision analysis and portfolio management to improve project selection in the exploration and production firm. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 44: 55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ward, J. & Griffiths, P.M. (1996). Strategic Planning for Information Systems, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.

  59. Zahra, S., Hayton, J., Marcel, J. & O’Neill, H. (2001). Fostering entrepreneurship during international expansion: managing key challenges. European Management Journal, 19(4): 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IBM Japan, Industrial Sector Marketing Executive, Tokyo, Japan

    Masafumi Kotani

  2. Graduate School of Decision Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan

    Junichi Iijima

Authors
  1. Masafumi Kotani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junichi Iijima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masafumi Kotani.

Additional information

Masafumi Kotani is the Marketing Executive of Industrial Sector, IBM Japan. He has focused on his research attention on the IT investment evaluation and business process redesign. He has a Master of Science degree in Computer Science from University of California, Berkeley (1975).

Junichi Iijima is a professor of the Department of Industrial Management and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan. He obtained Doctor of Engineering in 1982 from Tokyo Institute of Technology. His major interests are IT investment, IS Integration and E-Business. He is currently the president of JASMIN (the Japan Society for Management Information).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotani, M., Iijima, J. IT applications portfolio management under business and implementation uncertainty. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 17, 109–124 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-008-5066-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-008-5066-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation