Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transcendence and Feminism: Response to Anderson’s “Feminist Challenges to Conceptions of God”

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An argument that Pamela Sue Anderson’s critique of Irigaray commits her to a version of the Ideal Observer Theory, a theory Anderson rejects. This paper was delivered in the APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This essay is in the collection Faith and Philosophical Analysis, H. Harris and C. J. Insole (eds.) (Hants: Ashgate, 2005).

  2. I defend this position in “The God’s Eye Point of View” in Faith and Philosophical Analysis, “Relativizing the Ideal Observer Theory,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1:49, 123–38, Contemporary Philosophy of Religion (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997) and elsewhere.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, St. Olaf College, Northfield, MN, 55057, USA

    Charles Taliaferro

Authors
  1. Charles Taliaferro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Taliaferro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taliaferro, C. Transcendence and Feminism: Response to Anderson’s “Feminist Challenges to Conceptions of God”. Philosophia 35, 371–373 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-007-9073-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-007-9073-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation