Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Sustainable Decision Support Framework for Urban Water Management

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a decision support framework that assists managers in the urban water industry to analyse a mix of water service options, at the whole-of-city scale. The decision support framework moves decision-making in urban water systems from traditional command and control approaches that tend to focus on an outcome at a point in time to a more sustainable, inclusive and dynamic decision-making process driven by social learning and engagement. While available models and evaluation techniques provide valuable input to decision-making, the complex nature of urban water systems requires more than just social and economic criteria to be considered as part of decision support frameworks. The authors believe that current decision support frameworks need to be presented in a way that incorporates adaptive management and integrated urban water management strengths at the strategic and operational level. The inclusion of social learning and engagement is necessary to achieving this end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan C, Curtis A (2003) Learning to implement adaptive management. Nat Resour Manage 6:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein S (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(4):216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE/ UNESCO (1998) Sustainability criteria for water resource systems. Prepared by the Task Committee on Sustainability Criteria Water Resources Planning and Management Division, ASCE, Reston VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs J (1999) Teaching for quality learning at university. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown R (2005) Impediments to integrated urban stormwater management: the need for institutional reform. Environ Manag 36(3):455–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchy M, Race D (2001) The twists and turns of community participation in natural resource management in Australia: what is missing? J Environ Plan Manag 44(3):293–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard R, Deletic A, Craig A (2000) Techniques for water and wastewater management: a review of techniques and their integration in planning. Urban Water 2:197–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Makropoulos C (2006) Water related infrastructure for sustainable communities. Technological options and scenarios for infrastructure systems. Science report SC05002501. Environment Agency. ISBN: 184432611X 125 pp. Available online: http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk

  • Butler D, Schütze M (2005) Integrating simulation models with a view to optimal control of urban wastewater systems. Environ Model Softw 20(4):415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer T (2007) Urban water policy: in need of economics. Agenda 13(1):3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbe V, Frehmann T, Geiger W et al (2002) Integrated modelling as an analysing and optimisation tool for urban watershed management. Water Sci Technol 46:141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2000) Water framework directive 2000/60/EC. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing S, Grayson R, Argent R (2000) Science, citizens, and catchments: decision support for catchment planning in Australia. Soc Nat Resour 13:443–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang C-L, Bao C, Huang J-C (2007) Management implications to water resources constraint force on socio-economic system in rapid urbanization: a case study of Hexi Corridor, NW China. Water Resour Manag 21:1613–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fien J (1993) Education for the environment: critical curriculum theorising and environmental education. Deakin University Press, Geelong

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Water Partnership (2000) Introducing effective water governance. Global Water Partnership, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI (2002) Sustainability reporting guidelines, G3. Available via http://www.globalreporting.org/NR/rdonlyres/ED9E9B36-AB54–4DE1-BFF2–5F735235CA44/0/G3_GuidelinesENU.pdf. Cited 17 July 2007

  • Hall D (2007) The watertime project. Util Policy 15(2):61–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall D, Lobina E (2007) Watertime: good practice recommendations. Available from http://watertime.net/. Citied 19 July 2007

  • Harremoes P (1997) Integrated water and waste management. Water Sci Technol 35(9):11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harremoes P (2002) Water ethics—a substitute for over-regulation. Water Sci Technol 45(8):113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield-Dodds S, Syme G, Leitch A (2007) Improving Australian water management: the contribution of social values research. Reform 89:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrom D, Jeppsson U, Karrman E (2000) A framework for systems analysis of sustainable urban water management. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20(3):311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrom D, Hjerpe M, van Moeffaert D (2004) Indicators to assess ecological sustainability in the Urban Water sector. Report 2004:3, The Mistra Programme, Urban Water

  • Holling C (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental management and assessment. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam M, Oki T, Kanae S et al (2007) A grid-based assessment of global water scarcity including virtual water trading. Water Resour Manag 21(1):19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (1999) ISO 14041: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis

  • Jury W, Vaux H Jr (2005) The role of Science in solving the world’s emerging water problems. Science 102(44):15715–15720

    Google Scholar 

  • Korfmacher K (2001) The politics of participation in watershed modelling. Environ Manag 27:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai E, Lundie S, Ashbold NJ (2009) Review of multi-criteria decision aid for integrated sustainability assessment of urban water system. Urban Water J 5(4):315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen T and Gujer W (1997) The concept of sustainable urban water management. Water Sci Technol 35(9):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence P, Bennett J (2002) Improved planning and management in coastal environments using an adaptive management framework. J Australian Water Assoc 29(6):18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KN (1999) Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 3:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviston Z, Porter N, Nancarrow B (2006) Interpreting householder preferences to evaluate water supply systems. Stage 3. Report to CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country. CSIRO Land and Water, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindah G, Gilbrich W (1996) Water in an urbanizing world. Nat Resour 32(2):31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundie S, Ashbolt N, Livingston D et al (2005) Methodology for evaluating the overall sustainability of urban water systems. The University of New South Wales, Centre for Water and Waste Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist J, Tortajada C, Varis O, Biswas A (2005) Water management in megacities. Ambio 34(3):267–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheepala S, Blackmore J (2007) Integrated urban water management for cities. In: Newton P (ed) Transition. CSIRO publishing

  • Makropoulos CK, Natsis K, Liu S, Mittas K, Butler D (2008) Decision support for sustainable option selection in integrated urban water management. Environ Model Softw 23(12):1448–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malqvist P-A, Palmquist H (2005) Decision support tools for urban water and wastewater systems—focusing on hazardous flows assessment. Water Sci Technol 51(8):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannina G, Freni G, Viviani G, Sægrov S, Hafskjold LS (2006) Integrated urban water modelling with uncertainty analysis. Water Sci Technol 54(6–7):379–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks J, Zadoroznyj M (2005) Managing sustainable urban water reuse: structural context and cultures of trust. Soc Nat Resour 18:557–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus R, Brown R (2002) The increasing organisational uptake of source control approaches for sustainable stormwater management. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on urban storm drainage—CDROM, 30 August–3 September 2002, Portland, OR, USA

  • Mitchell V (2006) Applying integrated urban water management concepts: a review of Australian experience. Environ Manag 37(5):589–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorehouse B (2000) Climate impacts on urban water resources in the Southwest; the importance of context. J Am Water Resour Assoc 36(2):265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSW (2006) 2006 Metropolitan water plan: water for life. State Government of New South Wales

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manag 21(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Borowski I (2007) Methods for participatory water resources management. Water Resour Manag 21(7):1047–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A et al (2007a) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007b) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Mostert E, Tàbara D (2008) The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science. Ecol Soc 13(1):24. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art24/

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J (1995) Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Dev 23(8):1247–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch W, Bertrand-Krajewski J, Krebs P et al (2002) Mathematical modelling of integrated urban drainage systems. Water Sci Technol 45:81–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch W, Seggelke K, Brown R, Krebs P (2005) Integrated approaches in urban storm drainage: where do we stand? Environ Manag 35(4):396–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees W (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4(2):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Webler T, Wiedeman P (eds) (1995) Fairness and competence in citizen participation; evaluating models for environmental discourse. Kluwer Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross H, Buchy M, Proctor W (2002) Laying down the ladder: a typology of public participation in Australian natural resource management. Aust J Environ Manag 9:205–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T, Lazarow N (2004) Social learning and the adaptive management framework. J Coast Res SI 39:952–954, ISSN 0749-0208

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T, Smith D (2006) Institutionalising adaptive learning for coastal management. In: Lazarow N, Souter R, Fearon R, Dovers S (eds) Coastal management in Australia: key institutional and governance issues for coastal natural resource management and planning. CRC for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management, Brisbane, pp 115–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme G (1996) The future of public involvement. Water J 23(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme G, Hatfield-Dodds S (2007) The role of communication and attitude research in the evolution of effective resource management arrangements. In: Hussey K, Dovers S (eds) Managing water for Australia: the social and institutional challenges. CSIRO Publishing

  • Tàbara JD, Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Sustainability learning in natural resource use and management. Ecol Soc 12(2):3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art3/

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A, Fletcher T, Peljo L (2006) Triple-bottom-line assessment of stormwater quality projects: advances in practicality, flexibility and rigour. Urban Water J 3(2):79–90(12)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck J, Yaffee S (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo S-H (2007) Urban water consumption and regional economic growth: the case of Taejeon, Korea. Water Resour Manag 21(8):1353–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, P. O. Box 56, Highett, Victoria, Australia, 3190

    Leonie J. Pearson

  2. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, St Lucia, QLD, Australia, 4067

    Anthea Coggan

  3. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Gungahlin, ACT, Australia, 2061

    Wendy Proctor

  4. University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia, 4558

    Timothy F. Smith

Authors
  1. Leonie J. Pearson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthea Coggan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wendy Proctor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Timothy F. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonie J. Pearson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearson, L.J., Coggan, A., Proctor, W. et al. A Sustainable Decision Support Framework for Urban Water Management. Water Resour Manage 24, 363–376 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9450-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9450-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation