Abstract
We study the combined impact of heterogeneous advection and mobile–immobile mass transfer on non-Fickian transport using the continuous-time random walk (CTRW) approach. The CTRW models solute transport in heterogeneous media as a random walk in space and time. Our study is based on a d-dimensional CTRW model that accounts for both heterogeneous advection and mass transfer between mobile and immobile zones, to which we also refer as solute trapping. The flow heterogeneity is mapped into the distribution of advective transition times over a characteristic heterogeneity scale. Mass transfer into immobile zones is quantified by a trapping rate and the distribution of particle return times. The total particle transition time over a characteristic heterogeneity scale then is given by the advective time and the sum of trapping times over the number of trapping events. We establish explicit integro-partial differential equations for the evolution of the concentration and discuss the relation to the multirate mass transfer approach, specifically the relation between the trapping time distribution and the memory function. We then analyze the signatures of anomalous transport due to advective heterogeneity and trapping in terms of spatial moments and first passage times or breakthrough curves. The behaviors for different disorder scenarios are analyzed analytically and through random walk particle tracking simulations. Assuming that advective mass transfer is faster than diffusive, we identify three regimes of distinct transport behaviors, which are separated by the characteristic trapping rate and trapping times. (1) At early times, we identify a pre-asymptotic time regime that is fully determined by advective heterogeneity and which is characterized by superlinear growth of longitudinal dispersion. (2) For longitudinal dispersion, we identify an intermediate regime of strong superlinear diffusion. This regime is determined by the combined effect of advective heterogeneity and trapping. (3) At larger time, the asymptotic trapping-driven regime shows the signatures of diffusion in immobile zones, which leads to both sub- and superlinear dispersion. These results shed some new light on the mechanism of non-Fickian transport and their manifestation in spatial and temporal solute distributions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A.: Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York (1972)
Adams, E.E., Gelhar, L.W.: Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer, 2. Spatial moment analysis. Water Resour. Res. 28(12), 3293–3308 (1992)
Barenblatt, G.I., Zheltov, I.P., Kochina, I.N.: Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks [strata]. PMM 24(5), 825–864 (1960)
Barkai, E., Garini, Y., Metzler, R.: Strange kinetics of single molecules in living cells. Phys. Today 8(65), 29–35 (2012)
Barthelemy, P., Bertolotti, J., Wiersma, D.S.: A Lévy flight for light. Nature 453, 495–498 (2008)
Becker, M.W., Shapiro, A.M.: Interpreting tracer breakthrough tailing from different forced-gradient tracer experiment configurations in fractured bedrock. Water Resour. Res. 39, 1024 (2003)
Benke, R., Painter, S.: Modeling conservative tracer transport in fracture networks with a hybrid approach based on the Boltzmann transport equation. Water Resour. Res. 39, 1324 (2003)
Benson, D.A., Meerschaert, M.M.: A simple and efficient random walk solution of multi-rate mobile/immobile mass transport equations. Adv. Water Resour. 32(4), 532–539 (2009)
Benson, D.A., Wheatcrat, S.W., Meerschaert, M.M.: Application of a fractional advection-dispersion equation. Water Resour. Res. 36, 1403–1421 (2000)
Berkowitz, B., Scher, H.: On characterization of anomalous dispersion in porous and fractured media. Water Resour. Res. 31(6), 1461–1466 (1995)
Berkowitz, B., Scher, H.: Anomalous transport in random fracture networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(20), 4038–4041 (1997)
Berkowitz, B., Kosakowski, G., Margolin, G., Scher, H.: Application of continuous time random walk theory to tracer test measurements in fractured and heterogeneous porous media. Groundwater 39(4), 593–604 (2001)
Berkowitz, B., Cortis, A., Dentz, M., Scher, H.: Modeling non-fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk. Rev. Geophys. 44, RG2003 (2006)
Berkowitz, B., Emmanuel, S., Scher, H.: Non-fickian transport and multiple-rate mass transfer in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 44, W03402 (2008). doi:10.1029/2007WR005906
Bijeljic, B., Blunt, M.J.: Pore-scale modeling and continuous time random walk analysis of dispersion in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 42, W01202 (2006)
Bouchaud, J.P., Georges, A.: Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications. Phys. Rep. 195(4,5), 127–293 (1990)
Carrera, J., Sánchez-Vila, X., Benet, I., Medina, A., Galarza, G., Guimerà, J.: On matrix diffusion: formulations, solution methods, and qualitative effects. Hydrol. J. 6, 178–190 (1998)
Cortis, A., Berkowitz, B.: anomalous transport in “classical” soil and sand columns. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68(1539–1548), 2004 (2004)
Cortis, A., Chen, Y., Scher, H., Berkowitz, B.: Quantitative characterization of pore-scale disorder effects on transport in “homogeneous” granular media. Phys. Rev. E 70, 041108 (2004)
Cushman, J.H., Ginn, T.R.: Fractional advection-dispersion equation: a classical mass balance with convolution-Fickian flux. Water Resour. Res. 36, 3763–3766 (2000)
Cushman, J.H., Hu, X., Ginn, T.R.: Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics of preasymptotic dispersion. J. Stat. Phys. 75(5/6), 859–878 (1994)
Cvetkovic, V., Fiori, A., Dagan, G.: Solute transport in aquifers of arbitrary variability: a time-domain random walk formulation. Water Resour Res. 50, WR015449 (2014)
de Anna, P., Le Borgne, T., Dentz, M., Tartakovsky, A.M., Bolster, D., Davy, P.: Flow intermittency, dispersion and correlated continuous time random walks in porous media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 184502 (2013)
Dentz, M., Berkowitz, B.: Transport behavior of a passive solute in continuous time random walks and multirate mass transfer. Water Resour. Res. 39(5), 1111 (2003)
Dentz, M., Castro, A.: Effective transport dynamics in porous media with heterogeneous retardation properties. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L03403 (2009)
Dentz, M., Cortis, A., Scher, H., Berkowitz, B.: Time behavior of solute transport in heterogeneous media: transition from anomalous to normal transport. Adv. Water Resour. 27(2), 155–173 (2004)
Dentz, M., Gouze, P., Carrera, J.: Effective non-local reaction kinetics for transport in physically and chemically heterogeneous media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 120, 222–236 (2011)
Dentz, M., Gouze, P., Russian, A., Dweik, J., Delay, F.: Diffusion and trapping in heterogeneous media: an inhomogeneous continuous time random walk approach. Adv. Water Resour. 49, 13–22 (2012)
Dentz, M., Kang, P.K., Le Borgne, T.: Continuous time random walks for non-local radial solute transport. Adv. Water Resour. 82, 16–26 (2015)
Edery, Y., Guadagnini, A., Scher, H., Berkowitz, B.: Origins of anomalous transport in heterogeneous media: structural and dynamic control. Water Resour. Res. 50(2), 1490–1505 (2014)
Fiori, A., Jankovic, I., Dagan, G., Cvetkovic, V.: Ergodic transport trough aquifers of non-gaussian log conductivity distribution and occurence of anomalous behavior. Water Resour. Res. 43, W09407 (2007)
Gjetvaij, F., Russian, A., Gouze, P., Dentz, M.: Dual control of flow field heterogeneity and immobile porosity on non-fickian transport in berea sandstone. Water Resour. Res. (2015). doi:10.1002/2015WR017645
Gouze, P., Le Borgne, T., Leprovost, R., Lods, G., Poidras, T., Pezard, P.: Non-Fickian dispersion in porous media: 1. multi-scale measurements using single well injection withdrawal tracer tests at the ses sitjoles/aliance test site (Spain). Water Resour. Res. 44, W06426 (2008a)
Gouze, P., Melean, Z., Le Borgne, T., Dentz, M., Carrera, J.: Non-fickian dispersion in porous media explained by heterogeneous microscale matrix diffusion. Water Resour. Res. 44, W11416 (2008b)
Haggerty, R., Gorelick, S.M.: Multiple-rate mass transfer for modeling diffusion and surface reactions in media with pore-scale heterogeneity. Water Resour. Res. 31(10), 2383–2400 (1995)
Haggerty, R., McKenna, S.A., Meigs, L.C.: On the late time behavior of tracer test breakthrough curves. Water Resour. Res. 36(12), 3467–3479 (2000)
Haggerty, R.S., Fleming, S.W., Meigs, L.C., McKenna, S.A.: Tracer tests in a fractured dolomite: 2. Analysis of mass transfer in single-well injection-withdrawal tests. Water Resour. Res. 37, 1129–1142 (2001)
Harvey, C.F., Gorelick, S.M.: Temporal moment-generating equations: modeling transport and mass transfer in heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 31(8), 1895–1911 (1995)
Hatano, Y., Hatano, N.: Dispersive transport of ions in column experiments: an explanation of long-tailed profiles. Water Resour. Res. 34(5), 1027–1033 (1998)
Holzner, M., Morales, V.L., Willmann, M., Dentz, M.: Intermittent lagrangian velocities and accelerations in three-dimensional porous medium flow. Phys. Rev. E 92, 013015 (2015)
Kang, P.K., Dentz, M., Le Borgne, T., Juanes, R.: Spatial markov model of anomalous transport through random lattice networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 180602 (2011)
Kang, P.K., de Anna, P., Nunes, J.P., Bijeljic, B., Blunt, M.J., Juanes, R.: Pore-scale intermittent velocity structure underpinning anomalous transport through 3-D porous media. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41(17), 6184–6190 (2014)
Kang, P.K., Le Borgne, T., Dentz, M., Bour, O., Juanes, R.: Impact of velocity correlation and distribution on transport in fractured media: field evidence and theoretical model. Water Resour. Res. 51, 940–959 (2015)
Kenkre, V.M., Montroll, E.W., Shlesinger, M.F.: Generalized master equations for continuous-time random walks. J. Stat. Phys. 9(1), 45–50 (1973)
Klafter, J., Sokolov, I.: Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings. Phys. World 18(8), 29–32 (2005)
Koch, D.L., Brady, J.F.: Anomalous diffusion in heterogeneous porous media. Phys. Fluids A 31, 965–1031 (1988)
Le Borgne, T., de Dreuzy, J.R., Davy, P., Bour, O.: Characterization of the velocity field organization in heterogeneous media by conditional correlation. Water Resour. Res. 43, 2006WR004875 (2007)
Le Borgne, T., Dentz, M., Carrera, J.: Spatial Markov processes for modeling Lagrangian particle dynamics in heterogeneous porous media. Phys. Rev. E 78, 041110 (2008a)
Le Borgne, T., Dentz, M., Carrera, J.: A Lagrangian statistical model for transport in highly heterogeneous velocity fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 090601 (2008b)
Levy, M., Berkowitz, B.: Measurement and analysis of non-Fickian dispersion in heterogeneous porous media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 64, 203–226 (2003)
Maloszewski, P., Zuber, A.: On the theory of tracer experiments in fissured rocks with a porous matrix. J. Hydrol. 79, 333 (1985)
Margolin, G., Dentz, M., Berkowitz, B.: Continuous time random walk and multirate mass transfer modeling of sorption. Chem. Phys. 295, 71–80 (2003)
Metzler, R., Jeon, J.H., Cherstvy, A.G., Barkai, E.: Anomalous diffusion models and their properties: non-stationary, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the centenary of single particle tracking. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 24128 (2014)
Michalak, A.M., Kitanidis, P.K.: Macroscopic behaviour and random-walk particle tracking of kinetically sorbing solutes. Water Resour. Res. 36, 2133–2146 (2000)
Montroll, E.W., Weiss, G.H.: Random walks on lattices, 2. J. Math. Phys. 6(2), 167 (1965)
Morales-Casique, E., Neuman, S.P., Guadagnini, A.: Nonlocal and localized analyses of nonreactive solute transport in bounded randomly heterogeneous porous media: theoretical framework. Adv. Water Resour. 29(8), 1238–1255 (2006)
Moroni, M., Cushman, J.H.: Statistical mechanics with three-dimensional particle tracking velocimetry experiments in the study of anomalous dispersion. II. Experiments. Phys. Fluids 13, 81–91 (2001)
Neuman, S., Zhang, Y.: A quasi-linear theory of non-fickian and fickian subsurface dispersion 1. Theoretical analysis with application to isotropic media. Water Resour. Res. 26(5), 887–902 (1990)
Roth, K., Jury, W.A.: Linear transport models for adsorbing solutes. Water Resour. Res. 29(4), 1195–1203 (1993)
Salamon, P., Fernàndez-Garcia, D., Gómez-Hernández, J.J.: Modeling mass transfer processes using random walk particle tracking. Water Resour. Res. 42, W11417 (2006)
Scher, H., Lax, M.: Stochastic transport in a disordered solid I. Theory. Phys. Rev. B 7(1), 4491–4502 (1973)
Scher, H., Margolin, G., Metzler, R., Klafter, J., Berkowitz, B.: The dynamical foundation of fractal stream chemistry: the origin of extremely long retention times. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1061 (2002)
Schumer, R., Benson, D.A., Meerschaert, M.M., Bauemer, B.: Fractal mobile/immobile solute transport. Water Resour. Res. 39(10), 1296 (2003)
Villermaux, J.: Chemical engineering approach to dynamic modeling of linear chromatography, a simple method for representing complex phenomena from simple concepts. J. Chromatogr. 406, 11–26 (1987)
Weiss, G.H.: Aspects and Applications of the Random Walk. Elsevier, North-Holland (1994)
Willmann, M., Carrera, J., Sanchez-Vila, X.: Transport upscaling in heterogeneous aquifers: what physical parameters control memory functions? Water Resour. Res. 44, W12437 (2008)
Zhang, Y., Green, C.T., Baeumer, B.: Linking aquifer spatial properties and non-fickian transport in alluvial settings. J. Hydrol. 512, 315–331 (2014)
Zinn, B., Meigs, L.C., Harvey, C.F., Haggerty, R., Peplinski, W.J., von Schwerin, C.F.: Experimental visualization of solute transport and mass transfer processes in two-dimensional conductivity fields with connected regions of high conductivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 3916–3926 (2004). doi:10.1021/es034958g
Acknowledgments
The support of the European Research Council (ERC) through the project MHetScale (617511) is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Trapping Time Scales
The mass exchange process exhibits two distinct time scales. The first one is given by the inverse of the trapping rate \(\tau _\gamma = \gamma ^{-1}\). This time scale represents the time at which, on average, particles undergo the first trapping event. Moreover, it is also the average time that the particles spend in the mobile phase. For times larger than \(\tau _\gamma \), advection ceases to be the only process that governs transport.
The second time scale represents the moment at which particles start spending on average more time trapped than in the mobile phase. In order to determine this scale, we need to compare the average time spent mobile, which is given by \(\tau _\gamma \) to the average time spent immobile at a given time t. Note that the average trapping of the stable distribution (37) does not exist. Thus, in order to determine the characteristic trapping time after n trapping event, we first consider the mean number \(\nu (t_f) \equiv \langle n_{t_f} \rangle \) of trapping times needed to arrive at a given total trapping time \(t_{f,n} = \sum _{i=1}^{n} \tau _{f,i}\), which is given by the renewal theorem as
This equation is solved for the Laplace transform of \(\nu (t_f)\) as
Using the stable distributions (37) for small \(\lambda \tau _g\) gives \(\nu ^*(\lambda ) \approx \tau _g (\lambda \tau _g)^{-1-\delta }\), from which we obtain in time
The latter gives us a relation between the total trapping time and number of trapping events. We can use this relation to define a total mean trapping time as a function of step number by setting \(\nu (\langle t_f \rangle ) = n\), which gives \(\langle t_f(n) \rangle = \tau _g n^{1/\delta }\). Thus an average trapping time after n steps is simply \(\langle \tau _f(n) \rangle = \langle t_f(n) \rangle /n\), which gives
Notice that the latter is not strictly an average trapping time because for the stable distributions (37) the mean does not exist. It is rather a characteristic trapping time after n trapping events.
Appendix 2: Moments of the Spatial Distribution
1.1 Weak Advective Heterogeneity
In the following, we will derive the expressions for the scaling of the moments and the variance of particle displacements in both the longitudinal and transverse directions in the pre-asymptotic and in the asymptotic time regimes. In particular, we will consider all the possible cases corresponding to different choices of the distribution of trapping times. For the derivation of the moments, we will make use of the inverse Gamma distribution for \(\delta \) in (1, 2) and of stable distribution for \(\delta \) in (0, 1). This choice has as a consequence the fact that the Laplace transform of the distribution of immobile times in the asymptotic limit \((\lambda \rightarrow 0)\) can be approximated for \(\lambda \tau _g \ll 1\) as
By inserting Eq. (59) into Eq. (18), we get the expression for the distribution of transit times
From Eq. (60), we identify the trapping time scale \(\tau _e\) as follows. The second term in the denominator dominates for \(\lambda \ll \gamma (\gamma \tau _g)^{\frac{\delta }{1 - \delta }}\) and analogously for times \(t \gg \tau _\gamma (\gamma \tau _g)^{\frac{\delta }{\delta - 1}} \equiv \tau _e\).
We first derive the scalings of the moments in the pre-asymptotic time regime. Under this conditions, the PDF of transition times can be expanded and approximated with
By inserting Eq. (61) into the equations for the first moment (43) and for the second moment (44) in this time regime and by considering the leading term in \(\lambda \), we obtain
We recall that the first moment in the transverse direction is always null. By applying the Tauberian theorems, we calculate the scaling in time from the expressions in the Laplace domain of Eq. (62). Thus, we find
These results are valid for \(\delta \in (0,2)\). The variance is computed using Eq. (42). Note that the term proportional to \(t^2\) in Eq. (63) will cancel out with the square of the first moment. Therefore, we get for the variance
The procedure here described will be adopted to calculate all the scalings of the first moment and the variance in the following.
At long times, i.e., in the asymptotic time regime, the PDF of transition times can be approximated with
By substituting this expression into Eqs. (43) and (44), we get the scalings of the moments in the Laplace space. The mean value in the longitudinal direction behaves asymptotically as
By making use of the Tauberian theorems, we derive the asymptotic behavior of the variance in the temporal domain and we get
This procedure is repeated to calculate all the scalings of the moments. In the transverse direction, as we have already pointed out before, the first moment in the transverse directions is always null \(m_2 = 0\). For the spatial variances we obtain
1.2 Strong Advective Heterogeneity
We derive here the scalings of the moments for the case of strong advective heterogeneity. The latter is mapped onto heavy-tailed distributions of the mobile transition times. In particular, we will refer to inverse Gamma distributions for \(\beta \) in (1, 2). Therefore, the Laplace transform of \(\psi _m\) at long times can be approximated with
where \(\alpha _1\) and \(\alpha _2\) are constants. By inserting this expression into Eq. (18), we get the Laplace transform of the PDF of the compound process
The Laplace transform of the distribution of trapping times at long times is approximated by Eq. (59). By substituting the latter into Eq. (70), we get the distribution of total transition times in the Laplace space
We now follow the same procedure described in “Weak Advective Heterogeneity” of Appendix to derive the scaling of the moments in the pre-asymptotic and asymptotic limit for different choices of the parameters \(\beta \) and \(\delta \). In the pre-asymptotic limit, the mean value of particle displacements scales linearly with time
in the longitudinal direction, while in the transverse directions the mean is zero \(m_2(t) = 0\).
For the mean squared displacement, we find
in the direction of advection, while in the transverse direction the variance scales linearly
Unlike the previous case, late behavior is strongly conditioned by the trapping properties of the medium and, as a consequence, the scalings of the moments will in general depend on the distribution of times that the particles spend in the immobile phase. In particular, the first moment in the longitudinal direction scales as
while in the transverse directions the mean value is always null \(m_2(t) = 0\).
The scaling of the mean squared displacement along the direction in which advection occurs is given by
while in the transverse direction we get
Appendix 3: First Passage Time Distribution
Here we will derive the scaling of the FPTD in the asymptotic and pre-asymptotic regimes for both weak and strong advective heterogeneity. The derivation will be performed for the same scenarios discussed in the previous section.
1.1 Weak Advective Heterogeneity
We will derive the expressions for the asymptotic regime. It has been previously shown that the distribution of transition times is given by Eq. (60). For \(\lambda \tau _e \ll 1\), we obtain
Inserting the latter into (50) and using (48) gives for the Laplace transform of the FPTD
which is again a stable distribution characterized by the exponent \(\delta \). This gives directly the scaling \(f(t,x_c) \propto t^{-1-\delta }\) for \(t \gg \tau _e\).
1.2 Strong Advective Heterogeneity
Inserting (71) in (50) gives for \(f^*(\lambda ,x_c)\)
For \(\lambda \ll \gamma \), we approximate
which gives \(f(t,x_c) \propto t^{-1-\delta }\) for \(t \gg \tau _\gamma \). For \( \lambda \gg \gamma \), we have
which gives the pre-asymptotic scaling \(f(t,x_c) \propto t^{-1-\beta }\) for \(t \ll \tau _\gamma \).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Comolli, A., Hidalgo, J.J., Moussey, C. et al. Non-Fickian Transport Under Heterogeneous Advection and Mobile-Immobile Mass Transfer. Transp Porous Med 115, 265–289 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-016-0727-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-016-0727-6