Abstract
The paper argues that digital ontology (the ultimate nature of reality is digital, and the universe is a computational system equivalent to a Turing Machine) should be carefully distinguished from informational ontology (the ultimate nature of reality is structural), in order to abandon the former and retain only the latter as a promising line of research. Digital vs. analogue is a Boolean dichotomy typical of our computational paradigm, but digital and analogue are only “modes of presentation” of Being (to paraphrase Kant), that is, ways in which reality is experienced or conceptualised by an epistemic agent at a given level of abstraction. A preferable alternative is provided by an informational approach to structural realism, according to which knowledge of the world is knowledge of its structures. The most reasonable ontological commitment turns out to be in favour of an interpretation of reality as the totality of structures dynamically interacting with each other. The paper is the first part (the pars destruens) of a two-part piece of research. The pars construens, entitled “A Defence of Informational Structural Realism”, is developed in a separate article, also published in this journal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, P. (2002). Universe is a computer. Nature News, June 3. doi:10.1038/news020527-16.
Chaitin G.J. (2005) Meta math!: The quest for omega. Pantheon Books, New York
Chakravartty A. (2003) The structuralist conception of objects. Philosophy of Science 70(5): 867–878
Chalmers D.J. (1996) The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press, New York
Dedekind, R. (1963). Continuity and irrational numbers, in essays on the theory of numbers. New York: Dover, originally published in 1872.
Roever W.-P., Engelhardt K. (1998) Data refinement: Model-oriented proof methods and their comparison. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Feynman, R. P. (1992). The character of physical law. London: Penguin, originally published in 1965.
Floridi, L. (2004). Informational realism. In J. Weckert & Y. Al-Saggaf (Eds.), Computers and Philosophy 2003—Selected Papers from the Computer and Philosophy Conference (Cap 2003) Acs—Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, pp. 7–12.
Floridi L. (2008) A defence of informational structural realism. Synthese 161(2): 219–253
Floridi L., Sanders J.W. (2004) The method of abstraction. In: Negrotti M.(eds) Yearbook of the artificial—Nature, culture and technology, models in contemporary sciences. Peter Lang, Bern, pp 177–220
Fredkin, E. (1992). Finite nature. In Proceedings of the XXVIIth Rencontre de Moriond, March 22–28, 1992, Les Arcs, Savoie, France. Editions Frontieres: Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Fredkin E. (2003) The digital perspective. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 42(2): 145
Fredkin, E. (2003b). An introduction to digital philosophy. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 42(2), 189–247. Also available online at http://digitalphilosophy.org/
Fredkin, E. (online). Digital mechanics—An informational process based on reversible universal cellular automata. http://www.digitalphilosophy.org/dm_paper.htm
French, S. (2001). Symmetry, structure and the constitution of objects. Symmetries in Physics, New Reflections: Oxford Workshop, January 2001, Oxford.
Goodman N. (1968) Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill
Gower B. (2000) Cassirer, Schlick and ‘Structural’ realism: The philosophy of the exact sciences in the background to early logical empiricism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8(1): 71–106
Hoare C.A.R., He J. (1998) Unifying theories of programming. Prentice Hall, London
Holden T.A. (2004) The architecture of matter: Galileo to Kant. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Hyötyniemi, H. (1996). Turing machines are recurrent neural networks. In J. Alander, T. Honkela, & M. Jakobsson (Eds.), STeP’96—Genes, nets and symbols (pp. 13–24). Helsinki, Finland: Publications of the Finnish Artificial Intelligence Society (FAIS).
Kant I. (1998) Critique of pure reason repr. w. corr. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ladyman J. (1998) What is structural realism?. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29((3): 409–424
Langton R. (2004) Elusive knowledge of things in themselves. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82(1): 129–136
Lesne A. (2007) The discrete versus continuous controversy in physics. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 17(2): 185–223
Lewis D. (1971) Analog and digital. Nous 5(3): 321–327
Lloyd S. (2002) Computational capacity of the universe. Physical Review Letters 88(23): 237901–237904
Lloyd S. (2006) Programming the universe: From the Big Bang to quantum computers. Jonathan Cape, London
Margolus N. (2003) Looking at nature as a computer. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 42(2): 309–327
Müller, V. C. (forthcoming). What is a digital state?
Pais, A. (2005). Subtle is the lord: The science and the life of Albert Einstein (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press), originally published in 1982, republished with a new foreword by Sir Roger Penrose.
Petrov, P. (2003). Church-Turing thesis is almost equivalent to Zuse-Fredkin Thesis (an argument in support of Zuse-Fredkin Thesis). In Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS International Conference on Systems Theory and Scientific Computation, Special Session on Cellular Automata and Applications (ISTASC’03), Rhodes Island, Greece.
Saunders S. (2003) Structural realism, again. Synthese 136(1): 127–133
Sayre K.M. (1976) Cybernetics and the philosophy of mind. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Schmidhuber, J. (1997). A computer scientist’s view of life, the universe, and everything. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1337, 201–208.
Schmidhuber, J. (forthcoming). All computable universes. Spektrum der Wissenschaft (German edition of Scientific American).
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949 rep. 1998). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Siegelmann H.T. (1998) Neural networks and analog computation: Beyond the turing limit. Birkhèauser, Boston
Steinhart E. (1998) Digital metaphysics. In: Bynum T., Moor J.(eds) The digital phoenix: How computers are changing philosophy.. Blackwell, New York, pp 117–134
Steinhart, E. (2003). The physics of information. In L. Floridi (Ed.), Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information. Oxford: Blackwell, chapter 13.
Toffoli T. (2003) A digital perspective and the quest for substrate-universal behaviors. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 42: 147–151
’t Hooft G. (1997) In search of the ultimate building blocks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
’t Hooft G. (2002) How does god play dice? (Pre-)determinism at the Planck scale. In: Bertlmann R.A., Zeilinger A.(eds) Quantum [Un]speakables, from bell to quantum information.. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 307–316
’t Hooft G. (2003) Can quantum mechanics be reconciled with cellular automata?. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 42: 349–354
’t Hooft G. (2005) Does god play dice?. Physics World 18(12): 21–23
Turing A.M. (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Minds and Machines 59: 433–460
Von Neumann J. (1966) Theory of self-reproducing automata. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, London
Weinberg, S. (2002). Is the universe a computer? The New York Review of Books.
Wheeler, J. A. (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. H. Zureck (Ed.), Complexity entropy, and the physics of information. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley.
Wolfram S. (2002) A new kind of science. Wolfram Media, Champaign, IL
Worrall J. (1989) Structural realism: The best of both worlds?. Dialectica 43: 99–124
Zuse K. (1967) Rechnender Raum. Elektronische Datenverarbeitung 8: 336–344
Zuse, K. (1969). Rechnender Raum. Braunschweig: Vieweg. Eng. tr. with the title Calculating Space, MIT Technical Translation AZT-70-164-GEMIT. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Project MAC), 1970.
Zuse K. (1993) The computer, my life. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Floridi, L. Against digital ontology. Synthese 168, 151–178 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9334-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9334-6