Skip to main content
Log in

The Hairlessness Norm Extended: Reasons for and Predictors of Women’s Body Hair Removal at Different Body Sites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study aimed to explore the motivations behind and predictors of the practice of body hair removal among women. A sample of 235 Australian female undergraduate students completed questionnaires asking about the frequency and reasons for body hair removal, as well as measures of media exposure. It was confirmed that the vast majority (approximately 96%) regularly remove their leg and underarm hair, most frequently by shaving, and attribute this to femininity and attractiveness reasons. A sizeable proportion (60%) also removed at least some of their pubic hair, with 48% removing most or all of it. Here the attributions were relatively more to sexual attractiveness and self-enhancement. Further, having a partner and exposure to particular forms of media predicted pubic hair removal. It was concluded that pubic hair removal is currently different in connotation from leg or underarm hair, but is likely to be on the increase. It can only further the belief that women’s bodies are unacceptable the way they are.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basow, S. A. (1991). The hairless ideal: Women and their body hair. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., & Braman, A. C. (1998). Women and body hair: Social perceptions and attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 637–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., & Willis, J. (2001). Perceptions of body hair on white women: Effects of labeling. Psychological Reports, 89, 571–576.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. (2004). The beauty industry: Gender, culture, pleasure. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boroughs, M., Cafri, G., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). Male body depilation: Prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles, 52, 637–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, S. R., & Cheeks, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapkis, W. (1986). Beauty secrets: Women and the politics of appearance. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleo Magazine (2003). Brazilian or boho? Cleo Magazine, 363, 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleo Magazine (2005). The smart girl’s guide to grooming. Cleo Magazine, 392, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolly Magazine (2004). Bald or bushy. Dolly, 407, 80–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, C. (1982). Caucasian female body hair and American culture. Journal of American Culture, 5, 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J., Silberstein, L., & Striegel-Moore, R. (1985). Women and weight: A normative discontent. In T. B. Sondregger (Ed.), Psychology and gender (pp. 267–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teen Health, F.X. Retrieved June 2007 from http://www.teenhealthfx.com/answers/Sexuality/subcategory.php?subsection=51.

  • Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M. (2002). Media influences on body image development. In T. F. Cash, & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body Image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M. (2003). Media exposure, body dissatisfaction and disordered eating: Television and magazines are not the same!. European Eating Disorders Review, 11, 418–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M. (2005). Television and adolescent body image: The role of program content and viewing motivation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Kenyon, S. J. (1998). The hairlessness norm: The removal of body hair in women. Sex Roles, 39, 873–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Lewis, C. (2004). Attitudes towards women with body hair: Relationship with disgust sensitivity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toerien, M., & Wilkinson, S. (2003). Gender and body hair: Constructing the feminine woman. Women's Studies International Forum, 26, 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toerien, M., & Wilkinson, S. (2004). Exploring the depilation norm: A qualitative questionnaire study of women’s body hair removal. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toerien, M., Wilkinson, S., & Choi, P. Y. L. (2005). Body hair removal: The ‘mundane’ production of normative femininity. Sex Roles, 52, 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tragar, J. D. K. (2006). Pubic hair removal—Pearls and pitfalls. Journal of Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology, 19, 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ussher, J. (1989). The psychology of the female body. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth. New York: William Morrow and Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marika Tiggemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiggemann, M., Hodgson, S. The Hairlessness Norm Extended: Reasons for and Predictors of Women’s Body Hair Removal at Different Body Sites. Sex Roles 59, 889–897 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9494-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9494-3

Keywords

Navigation