Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Response to A Response: Gender Neutrality, Rape and Trial Talk

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bavelas, Janet, and Linda, Coates. 2001. Is it sex or assault? Erotic versus violent language in sexual assault trial judgements. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless 10(1): 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Carvalho Figueiredo, Débora. 2002. Discipline and punishment in the discourse of legal decisions on rape trials. In Language in the legal process, ed. Janet Cotterill, 260–274. Hampshire: Palgrave.

  3. Coates, Linda, and Allan, Wade. 2004. Telling it like it isn’t: Obscuring perpetrator responsibility for violent crime. Discourse and Society 15(5): 499–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrlich, Susan. 1999. Communities of practice, gender and the representation of sexual assault. Language in Society 28: 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrlich, Susan. 2001. Representing rape: Language and sexual consent. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ehrlich, Susan. 2002. Legal institutions, nonspeaking recipiency and participants’ orientations. Discourse and Society 13(6): 731–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frith, Hannah, and Kitzinger, Celia. 2001. Reformulating sexual script theory: Developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation. Theory & Psychology 11(2): 209–232.

  8. Kitzinger, Celia, and Hannah, Frith. 1999. Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse and Society 10(3): 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matoesian, Gregory M. 1993. Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Home Office (UK). 2000. Setting the boundaries: Reforming the law on sex offences. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/vol1main.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Arts – Fincham, Roehampton University, London, UK

    Annabelle Mooney

Authors
  1. Annabelle Mooney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annabelle Mooney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mooney, A. A Response to A Response: Gender Neutrality, Rape and Trial Talk. Int J Semiot Law 21, 157–160 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-008-9072-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-008-9072-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation