Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The theoretical costs of ignoring childhood: rethinking independence, insecurity, and inequality

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Childhood scholars have found that age inequality can be as profound an axis of meaningful difference as race, gender, or class, and yet the impact of this understanding has not permeated the discipline of sociology as a whole. This is one particularly stark example of the central argument of this article: despite decades of empirical and theoretical work by scholars in “the social studies of childhood,” sociologists in general have not incorporated the central contributions of this subfield: that children are active social agents (not passive), knowing actors strategizing within their constraints (not innocent), with their capacities and challenges shaped by their contexts (not universally the same). I contend that mainstream sociology’s relative imperviousness has led to theoretical costs for both childhood scholars—who must re-assert and re-prove the core insights of the field—and sociologists in general. Using three core theoretical debates in the larger discipline—about independence, insecurity, and inequality—I argue that children’s perspectives can help scholars ask new questions, render the invisible visible, and break through theoretical logjams. Thus would further research utilizing children’s perspectives and the dynamics of age extend the explanatory power of social theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. My main engagement here is with sociologists who study broad theoretical questions without considering children at all. I leave aside the large and interesting body of work by demographers who are interested in the impact of social phenomena on children’s outcomes (e.g., Musick and Meier 2012; 2010; Carlson and Corcoran 2001; Carlson and Berger 2013; Bianchi 1999).

  2. In this article, I refer to the social studies of childhood and childhood studies interchangeably, to signify the large interdisciplinary field dedicated to the active child subject.

  3. It is beyond the scope of this article to document the presence of these ideas in other fields, such as psychology or education, where some scholars have long taken issue with socialization, or have begun to complicate the universalizing characteristics of the developmentalist paradigm. Instead, our task here is to sketch out the constructionist views that unite the social studies of childhood, to make note of the intractability of essentialist visions of children—even within sociology, a discipline dedicated to mapping the social construction of inequality—and to outline at least three areas where that myopia has engendered costs to theory.

  4. Yet there are also many other factors—beyond the insularity of the scholarly community—contributing to the intransigence of the ideology of projected childhood. Among these we might point to demographic changes as crucial, especially the decrease in children as a percentage of the population in developed nations, and the massive participation of mothers in the paid labor force. Both of these changes arguably contributed to a hyper-symbolization of children as the last vestige of home, the private sphere, of sacralized domesticity and all of its attendant cultural power (Zelizer 1985; Pugh 2009). The increasing homogeneity of adult life—in which women’s schedules increasingly look like men’s, as working hours converge—may serve further to demarcate children as the Other, those who continue to embody dependence even after more women are leaving that derogated status behind (Hochschild 2003; Fraser and Gordon 1994). In addition, adults surely find the ideology of projected childhood useful for their own ends, thus contributing to its longevity. Both passivity and innocence, for example, are entangled in the notion of children as victims, and, as Thorne (1987, p. 90) notes, media accounts of child victims often successfully deflect victim-blaming discourse, allowing for journalists to “convey the severity of problems that adults often face as well.” A full accounting of the reasons for the imperviousness of sociology to the insights of the social studies of childhood is beyond the capacities of this article.

  5. Using “independence” thus to mean free of others’ influence, he argued that this new life stage contributed to increasing numbers of same sex and interracial partnerships (Rosenfeld and Kim 2005; Rosenfeld 2007). Critics largely ignored the cultural implications of this work, and focused on his empirical claims, contending that Rosenfeld may have underestimated the degree to which children formed transgressive unions earlier in history (Furstenberg 2007; Chananie-Hill 2008).

References

  • Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and Identity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alanen, L. (1988). Rethinking childhood. Acta Sociologica, 31(1), 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alanen, L. (1994). Gender and generation: Feminism and the child question. In J. Qvortrup, M. Bardy, G. Sgritta, & H. Wintersberger (Eds.), Childhood matters. Social theory, practice and politics. Brookfield: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alanen, L. (2005). Women’s studies/childhood studies: Parallels, links and perspectives. In J. Mason & T. Fattore (Eds.), Children taken seriously in theory, policy and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambert, A.-M. (1986). Sociology of sociology: The place of children in North American sociology. In P. Adler & P. Adler (Eds.), Sociological studies of child development, vol. 1 (pp. 11–31). Westport: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood (trans. Baldick R.) New York: Knopf.

  • Arnett, J.J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Baraldi, C. (2003). Planning childhood: Children’s social participation in the town of adults. In P. Christensen & M. O’Brien (Eds.), Children in the city: Home, neighbourhood and community. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

  • Bianchi, S. M. (1999). Feminization and juvenilization of poverty: trends, relative risks, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatterer, H. (2007). Contemporary adulthood - reconceptualizing an uncontested category. Current Sociology, 55(6), 771–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluebond-Langner, M. (1978). The private worlds of dying children. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, E. (1980). The nurture of adults by children in family settings. In: H. Lopata (Ed.), Research in the interweave of social roles: Women and men (Vol. 1, pp. 167–189). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Brannen, J., Heptinstall, E., & Bhopal, K. (2000). Children’s contribution to family life. In Connecting children: Care and family life in later childhood (pp. 154–177). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2000). After the death of childhood: Growing up in the age of electronic media. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhler-Niederberger, D. (2010). Childhood sociology—defining the state of the art and ensuring reflection. Current Sociology, 58(2), 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. J., & Berger, L. M. (2013). What kids get from parents: packages of parental involvement across complex family forms. Social Service Review, 87(2), 213–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. J., & Corcoran, M. E. (2001). Family structure and children’s behavioral and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 779–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chananie-Hill, R. A. (2008). Book review of The age of independence: interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family, by Michael J. Rosenfeld (2007). Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 832–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. (2009). The marriage go-round. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. (1993). The social construction of help among Danish children. Sociology of Health and Illness, 15, 488–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. M. & O'Brien, M. (2003). Children in the city: home, neighbourhood and community. London and New York: Routledge.

  • Cockburn, T. (1998). Children and citizenship in Britain. Childhood, 5(1), 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure, 94, S95–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M., & Ennew, J. (1996). Introduction: children out of place. Childhood, 3(2), 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, P. (2008). Race, gender and critical reflexivity in research with young children. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed.). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. (2004). The commodification of childhood: The children’s clothing industry and the rise of the child consumer. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. (2008). The missing child in consumption theory. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 219–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. A. 1985. Friendship and peer culture in the early years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

  • Côtè, J. E. (2000). Arrested adulthood: The changing nature of maturity and identity. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, G. (2004). The cute and the cool: Wondrous innocence and modern American children’s culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, L. R., & Kosminsky, E. V. (2010). Childhood and its regimes of visibility in Brazil: an analysis of the contribution of the social sciences. Current Sociology, 58, 206–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1987). Classification in art. American Sociological Review, 52, 440–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreby, J. (2007). Children and power in Mexican transnational families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 69, 1050–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreby, J. (2010). Divided By borders: Mexican immigrants and their children. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. (1998). Juvenile and criminal justice systems’ responses to youth violence. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 24, 189–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Gordon, L. (1994). A genealogy of dependency: tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs, 19(2), 309–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2003). Creating and contesting boundaries: exploring the dynamics of conflict and classification. Sociological Forum, 18(1), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. Jr. (2007). Review of “The age of independence: interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family” by Michael J. Rosenfeld. Population and Development Review, 33(4), 822–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, J. (1995). Must identity movements self-destruct? A queer dilemma. Social Problems, 42(3), 390–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H. (2009). We fight to win. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindstaff, L., & West, E. (2006). Cheerleading and the gendered politics of sport. Social Problems, 54(4), 500–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, G. M. D. (2007). Caring children: exploring care in post-divorce families. Sociological Review, 55(4), 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (1994). Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Sociological Theory, 12, 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, T. (1998). At home in the street: Street children of Northeast Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, D. J. (1993). America’s children: Resources from family, the government and the economy. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M., Davis, J., Prout, A., & Tisdall, K. (2004). Moving the participation agenda forward. Children and Society, 18(2), 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (2003). The commercialization of intimate life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., Reynolds, T. & Weller, S. (2007) Transitions, networks and communities: the significance of social capital in the lives of children and young people. Journal of Youth Studies 10(1), 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr, B., Horst, H.S., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K., Pascoe, C.J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • James, A. (2011). To be (come) or not to be (come): understanding children’s citizenship. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 633, 167.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & James, A. L. (2001). Childhood: toward a theory of continuity and change. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 575(1), 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., Jenks, C. & Prout, A. (1998) Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (1997). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 7–33). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (1982). The sociology of childhood. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. B. (2001). From the Chicago school to the new sociology of children: the sociology of children and childhood in the United States, 1900-1999. Advances in Life Course Research (Children in the Millennium: Where Have We Come From, Where Are We Going?), 6, 53–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, C. (2005). Growing up global: Economic restructuring and children’s everyday lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, D. (2013). Children: their place in organization studies. Organization Studies. doi:10.1177/0170840613495329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (1997). Who are you kidding: Children, power and the struggle against sexual abuse. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood (pp. 165–189). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and American upper-middle class. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (1994). Children’s rights. In B. Mayall (Ed.), Children's childhoods: Observed and experienced (pp. 33–44). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: social class and childrearing in black and white families. American Sociological Review, 67, 747–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (2001). Childhood and society: Growing up in an age of uncertainty. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and the internet. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizardo, O. (2006). How cultural tastes shape personal networks. American Sociological Review, 71, 778–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNaughton, G., Hughes, P., & Smith, K. (2007). Young children’s rights and public policy: practices and possibilities for citizenship in the early years. Children and Society, 21, 458–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Hood, S. (2011). Exploring issues of children as actors in social research. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 490–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S. H. (2007). A window on the ‘new’ sociology of childhood. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 322–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (2000). Sociology of childhood in relation to children’s rights, the special issue: Childhood 5-16: Papers from ESRC Research Project in the U.K. URL: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intjchrb8&div=24&g_sent=1&collection=journals#262. Accessed September 27, 2010.

  • Mayall, B. (2001). Understanding childhoods: A London study. In L. Alanen & B. Mayall (Eds.), Conceptualizing child-adult relations (pp. 114–128). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (2002). Towards a sociology for childhood: Thinking from children’s lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for western civilisation. New York: Blue Ribbon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. (2004). The social and cultural construction of childhood. In M. Coleman & L. H. Ganong (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary families (pp. 35–54). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. (2008). Reflections on age as a category of historical analysis. The Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth, 1(1), 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V. (2001) Young people's explanations and experiences of social exclusion: retrieving Bourdieu's concept of social capital. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 21(4–6), 37–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V. (2005). Social capital, community cohesion and participation in England: a space for children and young people? Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue 9, 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V. (2013). What’s in a number: unsettling the boundaries of age. Childhood, 20(2), 151–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musick, K., & Meier, A. (2010). Are both parents always better than one? Parental conflict and young adult well-being. Social Science Research, 39, 814–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musick, K., & Meier, A. (2012). Assessing causality and persistence in associations between family dinners and adolescent well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(3), 476–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1994). Women and children first and last: Parallels and differences between children and women’s studies. In B. Mayall (Ed.), Children’s childhoods observed and experienced (pp. 13–32). New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, S., & Schneider, B. L. (2007). Children’s role in generating social capital. Social Forces, 85(3), 1125–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orellana, M. F. (2001). The work kids do: Mexican and Central American immigrant children’s contributions to households and schools in California. Harvard Educational Review, 71(3), 366–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachucki, M., Pendergrass, S., & Lamont, M. (2007). Boundary processes: recent theoretical developments and new contributions. Poetics, 35(6), 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, R. (2006). Paranoid parenting? Rematerializing risk and fear for children. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(2), 221–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2000). Forward. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices. New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2005). The future of childhood. London: Routledge Falmer.

  • Pugh, A. J. (2009). Longing and belonging: Parents, children and consumer culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, A. J. (2011). Distinction, boundaries or bridges?: children, inequality and the uses of culture. Poetics, 39(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. F. 2010. Work, retirement, and the encore career: elders and the future of the American workforce. Generations: the Journal of the American Society on Aging, 34(3), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, J. (1994). Childhood matters. An introduction. In J. Qvortrup, M. Bardy, G. Sgritta, & H. Wintersberger (Eds.), Childhood matters. Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 1–23). Brookfield: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, J. (2003). Editorial: an established field, or a breakthrough still pending? Childhood, 10, 395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, J. (2008). Macroanalysis of childhood. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 66–86). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, J., Corsaro, W. A., & Honig, M.-S. (Eds.). (2009). Why social studies of childhood: An introduction to the handbook. The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridge, T. (2007). Negotiating childhood poverty: Children’s subjective experiences of life on a low income. In H. Wintersberger, L. Alanen, T. Olk, & J. Qvortrup (Eds.), Childhood, generational order and the welfare state: Exploring children’s social and economic welfare. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of independence: Interracial unions, same-sex unions and the changing American family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Rosenfeld, M. J., & Kim, B.-S. (2005). The independence of young adults and the rise of interracial and same sex unions. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 541–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N., & Hoffman, D. (1998). Brazilian apartheid: Street kids and the struggle for urban space. In N. Scheper-Hughes & C. Sargent (Eds.), Small wars: The cultural politics of childhood (pp. 352–388). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N., & Sargent, C. (1998). Introduction: The cultural politics of childhood. In N. Scheper-Hughes & C. Sargent (Eds.), Small wars: The cultural politics of childhood (pp. 1–33). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schildkrout, E. (1982). Age and gender in Hausa society: Socio-economic roles of children in urban Kano. In J. S. LaFontaine (Ed.), Sex and age as principles of social differentiation (pp. 109–137). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (2004). Born to buy: The commercialized child and the new consumer culture. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, H. B. (1978). Transformations: The anthropology of children’s play. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2000). Children as respondents: The challenge for quantitative methods. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiter, E. (1993). Sold separately: Children and parents in consumer culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. (1992). A theory of structure—duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sgritta, G. B. (1997). Inconsistencies: childhood on the economic and political agenda. Childhood, 4(4), 375–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. (2013). Coming up short: working-class adulthood in an age of uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Small, M. L. (2009). Unanticipated gains. Origins of network inequality in everyday life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. B., & Taylor, N. (2003). Rethinking children’s involvement in decision-making after parental separation. Childhood, 10(2), 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, A. (1997). Negotiating childhood: Changing constructions of age for Norwegian children. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood. Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 126–144). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, N. (1996). Helping out: Children’s labor participation in Chinese take-away businesses in Britain. In J. Brannen & M. O’Brien (Eds.), Children in families. London and New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J., & Thorne, B. (1985). The missing feminist revolution in sociology. Social Problems, 32(4), 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (1987). Re-visioning women and social change: where are the children? Gender & Society, 1, 85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (2005). Unpacking school lunchtime: Structure, practice and the negotiation of difference. In C. Cooper, C. Garcia Coll, W. Todd Bartko, H. M. Davis, & C. Chatman (Eds.), Developmental pathways through middle childhood: Rethinking contexts and diversity as resources (pp. 63–88). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (2009). Childhood: changing and dissonant meanings. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, E., Kay, M., Davis, J. M., Prout, A., & Hill, M. (Eds.). (2006). Children, young people and social inclusion: Participation for what? Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprichard, E. (2008). Children as ‘being and becomings’: children, childhood and temporality. Children and Society, 22(4), 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. (2004). Public space and the culture of childhood. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ausdale, D., & Feagin, J. R. (2001). The first R: How children learn race and racism. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Krieken, R., & Bühler-Niederberger, D. (2009). Rethinking the sociology of childhood: Conflict, competition and cooperation in children’s lives. In A. Denis & D. Kalekin-Fishman (Eds.), The ISA handbook in contemporary sociology: Conflict, competition, cooperation (pp. 185–201). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhellen, E. (1999). Facilitating children’s rights in education: expectations and demands on teachers and parents. Prospects, 29(2), 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (2004). Developmental psychology and the study of childhood. In M. J. Kehily (Ed.), An introduction to childhood studies (pp. 96-107). New York: Open University Press.

  • Waters, M. (1990). Ethnic options: Choosing identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (2008). The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: a multilevel process theory. American Journal of Sociology, 113(4), 970–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. (1985). Pricing the priceless child. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. (2002). Kids and commerce. Childhood, 9(4), 375–396.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article has been through many iterations, including as the Jackson Memorial Lecture in Halifax, Nova Scotia at the “Childhood and Diversity—Multiple childhoods?” conference of the International Association of Francophone Sociologists –Research Committee on the Sociology of Childhood and the Canadian Sociological Association, as well as talks at a thematic session on children and childhood at the 2012 annual meetings of the American Sociological Association and at the University of South Florida. In addition to these helpful audiences, I am very grateful to Barrie Thorne, Jennifer Petersen, Jennifer Rubenstein, Jalane Schmidt, Jennifer Silva, Denise Walsh, and the Theory and Society reviewers for their comments on earlier versions. As editor, Raewyn Connell was particularly cogent and insightful in guiding revisions. This article was written with support from the United States Study Centre at the University of Sydney, Australia; the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Work-Family Career Development Grant; and the University of Virginia’s Faculty Summer Research Award in Humanities and Social Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allison J. Pugh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pugh, A.J. The theoretical costs of ignoring childhood: rethinking independence, insecurity, and inequality. Theor Soc 43, 71–89 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-013-9209-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-013-9209-9

Keywords

Navigation