Skip to main content
Log in

The Informational Role of Option Trading Volume in Equity Index Options Markets

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamic relations between future price volatility of the S&P 500 index and trading volume of S&P 500 options to explore the informational role of option volume in predicting the price volatility. The future volatility of the index is approximated alternatively by implied volatility and by EGARCH volatility. Using a simultaneous equation model to capture the volume-volatility relations, the paper finds that strong contemporaneous feedbacks exist between the future price volatility and the trading volume of call and put options. Previous option volumes have a strong predictive ability with respect to the future price volatility. Similarly, lagged changes in volatility have a significant predictive power for option volume. Although the volume-volatility relations for individual volatility and volume terms are somewhat different under the two volatility measures, the results on the predictive ability of volume (volatility) for volatility (volume) are broadly similar between the implied and EGARCH volatilities. These findings support the hypothesis that both the information- and hedge-related trading explain most of the trading volume of equity index options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aït-Sahalia, Y. and A. W. Lo, “ Nonparametric Estimation of State-Price Densities Implicit in Financial Asset Prices.”Journal of Finance 53, 499–548 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, J. H., “The Interrelation of Stock and Option Market Trading-Volume Data.”Journal of Finance 43, 949–961 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou, A. and P. Holmes, “Futures Trading, Information and Spot Price Volatility: Evidence for the FTSE-100 Stock Index Futures Contract Using GARCH.”Journal of Banking and Finance 19, 117–129 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Back, K., “Asymmetric Information and Options.”Review of Financial Studies 6, 435–472 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, M., “ Price Changes of Related Securities: The Case of Call Options and Stock.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 1–15 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. and M. Scholes, “ The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.”Journal of Political Economy 81, 637–659 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., “ Fact and Fantasy in the Use of Options.”Financial Analysts Journal 31, 36–41 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. and P. Y. Chung, “Intraday Relationships Among Index Arbitrage, Spot and Futures Price Volatility, and Spot Market Volume: A Transaction Data Set.”Journal of banking and Finance 17, 663–687 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K., Y. P. Chung and W.-M. Fong, “The Informational Role of Stock and Option Volume.”The Review of Financial Studies 15, 1049–1076 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K., P. Y. Chung and H. Johnson, “Why Option Prices Lag Stock Prices: A Trading-Based Explanation.”Journal of Finance 48, 1957–1968 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatrath, A., S. Ramchander and F. Song, “ Does Options Trading Lead to Greater Cash Market Volatility”? The Journal of Futures Markets 15, 785–803 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatrath, A., S. Ramchander and F. Song, “The Role of Futures Trading Activity in Exchange Rate Volatility.”The Journal of Futures Markets 16, 561–584 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernov, M., “Implied Volatilities as Forecasts of Future Volatility. Time-Varying Risk Premia, and Return Variability,”Working Paper, Division of Finance and Economics, Columbia Business School, New York, USA. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherian, J., “Option Pricing, Self-Fulfilling Prophecies, Implied Volatilities, and Strategic Interaction.”Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, (1993).

  • Chirac, D. P. and S. Manaster, “The Information Content of Market Prices and a Test of Market Efficiency.”Journal of Financial Economics 6, 213–234 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrat, A. and S. Rachman, “ Has Futures Trading Activity Caused Stock Price Volatility”? The Journal of Futures Markets 15, 537–557 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Demodaran, A. and C. Lim, “The Effects of Option Trading on the Underlying Stocks’ Return Processes.”Journal of Banking and Finance 15, 647–664 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller, “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time-Series with a Unit Root.”Econometrica 49, 1057–1072 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, C. and F. Zhang, “Trading Activity and Price Volatility in the Municipal Bond Market.”Journal of Finance, 59, 899–931 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, B., J. Fleming and R. E. Whaley, “Implied Volatility Functions: Empirical Tests.”Journal of Finance 53, 2059–2106 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. and V. K. Ng, “Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility.”Journal of Finance 48, 1749–1778 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., M. O’Hara and P. S. Srinivas, “Option Volume and Stock Prices: Evidence on Where Informed Traders Trade.”Journal of Finance 53, 431–465 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, J., B. Ostdiek and R. E. Whaley, “Trading Costs and the Relative Rates of Price Discovery in Stock, Futures, and Option Markets.”Journal of Futures Markets 16, 353–387 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J., “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Models.” Econometrica 37, 424–438 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. and P. Newbold, Forecasting Economic Time Series. Academic Press: New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, W. E., R. C. Hill and G. G. Judge, Learning and Practicing Econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D., Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J., “Measuring the Information Content of Stock Trades.”Journal of Finance 46, 179–207 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, P. D., “Reexamining Intraday Simultaneity in Stock Index Futures Markets.”Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 1191–1205 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou, K. and L. Sarno, “The Temporal Relationship Between Derivatives Trading and Spot Market Volatility in the U.K.: Empirical Analysis and Monte Carlo Evidence.”The Journal of Futures Markets 19, 245–270 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Llorence, G., R. Michaely, G. Saar and J. Wang, “Dynamic Volume-Return Relation of Individual Stocks.”The Review of Financial Studies 15, 1005–1048 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manaster, S. and R. J. Rendleman, “Option Prices as Predictors of Equilibrium Stock Prices.”Journal of Finance 37, 1043–057 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, S., A. Sarin and K. Shastri, “The Allocation of Informed Trading Across Related Markets: An Analysis of the Impact of Changes in Equity-Market Margin Requirements.”Journal of Finance 50, 1635–1654 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C., “Rational Theory of Option Pricing.”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 141–183 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merville, L. J. and D. R. Pieptea, “Stock Price Volatility, Mean-Reverting Diffusion, and Noise.”Journal of Financial Economics 24, 193–214 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagan, A., “Econometric Issues in the Analysis of Regressions with Generated Regressions.”International Economic Review 25, 221–247 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poteshman, A. M., “Forecasting Future Volatility from Option Prices.”Working Paper, Department of Finance, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar, G., “The Interrelation of Price Volatility and Trading Volume of Currency Options.”Journal of Futures Markets 23, 681–700 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, S. M., “Equity Options Trading Takes Defensive Turn as Players React to Stock Market Declines.”Wall Street Journal Sept. 19, C16 (2000a).

  • Sears, S. M., “Cisco, Dell and Ciena Attract Major Activity, as Traders Retake Positions in Tech Sector.”Wall Street Journal Sept. 26, C19 (2000b).

  • Sheikh, A. M. and E. I. Ronn, “A Characterization of the Daily and Intraday Behavior of Returns on Options.”Journal of Finance 49, 557–580 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, D. J., “Options Markets and Stock Return Volatility.”Journal of Financial Economics 23, 357–366 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, J. A. and R. E. Whaley, “Intraday Price Change and Trading Volume Relations in the Stock and Stock Options Market.” Journal of Finance 5, 191–220 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K., “High Put-Call Ratio Shows Defensive Postures Still Dominate, Despite Slip in Volatility.”Wall Street Journal Sep. 19, C14 (2001a).

  • Tan, K., “Rate Cut Nudges Volatility Down, but Investors Remain Anxious, Continue Defensive Hedging.”Wall Street Journal, Oct. 3, C11 (2001b).

  • Vijh, A. M., “Potential Biases from Using Only Trades Prices of Related Securities on Different Exchanges.”Journal of Finance 43, 1049–1055 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijh, A. M., “Liquidity of the CBOE Equity Options.”Journal of Finance 45, 1157–1179 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, R. E., “Valuation of American Call Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks: Empirical Tests.”Journal of Financial Economics 10, 29–58 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, R., “Valuation of American Futures Options: Theory and Empirical Evidence.”Journal of Finance 41, 127–150 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghulam Sarwar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarwar, G. The Informational Role of Option Trading Volume in Equity Index Options Markets. Rev Quant Finan Acc 24, 159–176 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-005-6335-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-005-6335-0

Key words

Navigation