Skip to main content
Log in

How organizational structure can reduce rent-seeking

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In multi-tiered organizations, individuals can engage in unproductive rent-seeking activities both within and between the divisions of the organization. Nevertheless, a multi-tiered organizational structure can induce efficiency gains by decreasing rent-seeking. We present a model of production and simultaneous internal and external rent-seeking, assuming a logistic contest success function. In equilibrium, there is generically either internal or external rent-seeking, but not both. A multi-tiered organization leads to less rent-seeking and higher welfare, even though the production technology gives no reason for any specific organizational structure. Our findings constitute a new efficiency rationale for multi-tiered organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A. E., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amegashie, J. A. (1999). The design of rent-seeking competitions: Committees, preliminary and final contests. Public Choice, 99, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amegashie, J. A. (2000). Some results on rent-seeking contests with shortlisting. Public Choice, 105, 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baik, K. H. (1998). Difference from contest success functions and effort levels in contests. European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baik, K. H., & Lee, S. (2000). Two-stage rent-seeking contests with carryovers. Public Choice, 103, 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, M. R. (2004a). Global threats and the domestic struggle for power. European Journal of Political Economy, 20, 495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, M. R. (2004b). Stable alliance formation in distributional conflict. European Journal of Political Economy, 20, 829–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, M., & Skaperdas, S. (2007). Economics of conflict: an overview. In T. Sandler & K. Hartley (Eds.), Handbook of defense economics (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: North Holland. Chap. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, A. (2002). Allies as rivals: internal and external rent seeking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausken, K. (1995). Intra-level and inter-level interaction. Rationality and Society, 7, 465–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1989). Conflict and rent-seeking success functions: ratio versus difference models of relative success. Public Choice, 63, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1991). The technology of conflict as an economic activity. American Economic Review, 81, 130–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inderst, R., Müller, H. M., & Wärneryd, K. (2007). Distributional conflict in organizations. European Economic Review, 51, 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., & Tokatlidu, J. (1996). Group competition for rents. European Journal of Political Economy, 12, 599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, K. A. (2004). Bidding in hierarchies. European Economic Review, 48, 1301–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization, and management. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. M., & Wärneryd, K. (2001). Inside versus outside ownership: a political theory of the firm. RAND Journal of Economics, 32, 527–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münster, J. (2007). Simultaneous inter- and intra-group conflicts. Economic Theory, 32, 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münster, J. (2009). Group contest success functions. Economic Theory, 41, 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münster, J., & Staal, K. (2010, forthcoming). War with outsiders makes peace inside. Conflict Management and Peace Science.

  • Nitzan, S. (1991). Collective rent dissipation. Economic Journal, 101, 1522–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, S. (2010, forthcoming). Two-stage group rent-seeking with negatively interdependent preferences. Public Choice. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9618-5

  • Skaperdas, S. (1996). Contest success functions. Economic Theory, 7, 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas, S., & Syropoulos, C. (1996). Can the shadow of the future harm cooperation? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 29, 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, W. E., & Rapoport, A. (2004). Asymmetric two-stage group rent-seeking: Comparison of two contest structures. Public Choice, 118, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, W. E., & Rapoport, A. (2005). Symmetric two-stage contests with budget constraints. Public Choice, 124, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wärneryd, K. (1998). Distributional conflict and jurisdictional organization. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Münster.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Münster, J., Staal, K. How organizational structure can reduce rent-seeking. Public Choice 150, 579–594 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9717-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9717-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation