Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

State-level Welfare Policies and Nonmarital Subsequent Childbearing

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using discrete time event history analyses of data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we examine the association between state-level welfare waiver policies implemented before the 1996 welfare reform legislation and the risk of a nonmarital subsequent birth. Our study makes a unique contribution to the existing literature by using a national-level sample of unmarried mothers who ever received welfare. This high-risk sample represents the women of most interest to policymakers, as it is the exact group to whom welfare reform is targeted—welfare mothers at risk of having nonmarital additional births. The state policies we study include: family cap, earnings disregard, work exemptions, work requirements, and sanctions. We conclude that, although reducing the number of nonmarital births is a key goal of welfare reform, state-established welfare waiver policies do not have any influence on women’s childbearing behaviors in this sample, net of women’s individual characteristics and state economic environments. Even the family cap policy, which was designed for the sole purpose of reducing additional births, has no significant association with nonmarital subsequent childbearing. Instead, personal characteristics, not public policies, are stronger determinants of women’s childbearing decisions. Age, race/ethnicity, marital status, number of previous children, education level, and welfare receipt are significantly associated with nonmarital subsequent births. Overall, this paper contributes to an expanding body of research that shows minimal effects of welfare waivers on fertility. Our work suggests that more targeted policies are necessary to be able to influence individual family formation behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACF Press Office. (2003). Re: HHS release – TANF program [press release]. Message posted to the Health and Human Services (HHS) press mailing list, archived at www.HHS.gov/news

  • Administration for Children and Families. (2003, 6/6/02). Fact sheets [Website]. Retrieved 10/19/03 from the World Wide Web: www.acf.dhhs.gov/news/facts/tanf.html

  • P. D. Allison (1995) Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide SAS Institute Cary NC

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Becketti W. Gould L. Lillard F. Welch (1988) ArticleTitleThe PSID after fourteen years: An evaluation Journal of Labor Economics 6 472–492 Occurrence Handle10.1086/298192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Beecroft K. Cahill B. D. Goodson (2002) The impacts of welfare reform on children: The Indiana welfare reform evaluation Abt Associates Inc Bethesda MD

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Blank (2002) ArticleTitleEvaluating welfare reform in the United States Journal of Economic Literature XL 1105–1166 Occurrence Handle10.1257/002205102762203576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Bloom J. Kemple P. Morris S. Scrivener N. Verma R. Hendra (2000) The family transition program: Final report on Florida’s initial time-limited welfare program Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (MDRC) New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Bloom S. Scrivener C. Michalopoulos P. Morris R. Hendra D. Adams-Ciardullo J. Walter W. Vargas (2002) Jobs first: Final report on Connecticut’s welfare reform initiative Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (MDRC) New York

    Google Scholar 

  • S. L. Brown (2000) ArticleTitleUnion transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations Journal of Marriage and the Family 62 833–846 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00833.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Bumpass H. Lu (2000) ArticleTitleTrends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States Population Studies 54 29–41

    Google Scholar 

  • A. C. Butler (2002) ArticleTitleWelfare, premarital childbearing, and the role of normative climate, 1968–1994 Journal of Marriage and the Family 64 295–313 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00295.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Camasso C. Harvey R. Jagannathan M. Killingsworth (1998a) A final report on the impact of New Jersey’s family development program Rutgers University New Brunswick NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Camasso C. Harvey R. Jagannathan M. Killingsworth (1998b) A final report on the impact of New Jersey’s family development program. Results from a pre-post analysis of AFDC case heads from 1990 to 1996 Rutgers University New Brunswick NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • S. B. Caudill F. G. J. Mixon (2000) ArticleTitleAFDC payments and illegitimacy ratios: A reappraisal of endogeneity using panel data American Journal of Economics and Sociology 59 451–462 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1536-7150.00037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameCouncil of Economic Advisors (1999) The effects of welfare policy and the economic expansion on welfare caseloads: An update Council of Economic Advisors Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • P. A. David W. C. Sanderson (1987) ArticleTitleThe emergence of a two-child norm among American birth controllers Population and Development Review 13 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Fein (1999) Will welfare reform influence marriage and fertility? Early evidence from the ABC demonstration Abt Associates Inc Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Fein L. Lindberg R. A. London J. Mauldon (2002) Welfare reform and family formation: Assessing the effects (Research Brief 1) Welfare Reform and Family Formation Project Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D. N., & Ziliak, J. P. (1998). Welfare reform, the business cycle, and the decline in AFDC caseloads. Paper presented at the Conference on Welfare Reform and the Macroeconomy. Washington DC.

  • J. Fitzgerald P. Gottschalk R. A. Moffitt (1998a) ArticleTitleAn analysis of sample attrition in panel data: The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics Journal of Human Resources 33 251–299 Occurrence Handle10.2307/146433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Fitzgerald P. Gottschalk R. A. Moffitt (1998b) ArticleTitleThe impact of attrition in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics on intergenerational analysis Journal of Human Resources 33 300–344 Occurrence Handle10.2307/146434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J., & Ribar, D. (2001). The impact of welfare waivers on female headship decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington DC.

  • E. M. Foster S. D. Hoffman (2001) The young and the not quite so young: Age variation in the impact of AFDC benefits on nonmarital childbearing L. L. B. Wu Wolfe (Eds) Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility Russell Sage Foundation New York 173–201

    Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Fraker C. M. Ross R. A. Stapulonis R. B. Olse M. D. Kovac M. R. Dion A. Rangarajan (2002) The evaluation of welfare reform in Iowa: Final impact report Mathematica Policy Research, Inc Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennetian, L., & Knox, V. (2003). Staying single: The effects of welfare and employment programs on marriage and cohabitation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Policy Analysis and Management, Washington DC.

  • Gibson, C., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2003). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Working paper 03-06-FF. Princeton NJ: Center for Research on Child Wellbeing

  • D. R. Graefe D. T. Lichter (2002) ArticleTitleMarriage among unwed mothers: Whites, blacks and Hispanics compared Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 34 286–174 Occurrence Handle10.2307/3097747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Grogger L. A. Karoly J. A. Klerman (2002) Consequences of welfare reform: A research synthesis (DRU-2676-DHHS) RAND Santa Monica CA

    Google Scholar 

  • K. M. Harris R. K. Raley R. R. Rindfuss (2002) ArticleTitleFamily configurations and child-care patterns: Families with two or more preschool-aged children Social Science Quarterly 83 455–471 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1540-6237.00094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Hofferth (1996) ArticleTitleChild care in the United States today The Future of Children 6 41–61 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1602418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. L. Hofferth S. Stanhope K. M. Harris (2002) ArticleTitleExiting welfare in the 1990s: Did public policy influence recipients’ behavior? Population Research and Policy Review 21 433–472 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021192013352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Horvath-Rose H. Peters (2001) Welfare waivers and non-marital childbearing G. P. L. Duncan Chase-Lansdale (Eds) For better and for worse: Welfare reform and the well-being of children and families Russell Sage New York 222–244

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Jagannathan M. J. Camasso (2003) ArticleTitleFamily cap and nonmarital fertility: The racial conditioning of policy effects Journal of Marriage and the Family 65 52–71 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00052.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, T., Kaestner, R., & Korenman, S. (2003). Welfare reform and non-marital fertility in the 1990s: Evidence from birth records. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3: Article 6. http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/advances/vol3/iss1/art6

  • R. Kaestner S. Korenman J. O’Neill (2003) ArticleTitleHas welfare reform changed teenage behaviors? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22 225–248 Occurrence Handle10.1002/pam.10115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Kaushal R. Kaestner (2001) ArticleTitleWelfare to work: Has welfare reform worked? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 699–719 Occurrence Handle10.1002/pam.1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. S. (2002). Is there an effect of incremental welfare benefits on fertility behavior? A look at the family cap. Working paper. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research

  • V. W. Knox C. Miller L. Gennetian (2000) Reforming welfare and rewarding work: A summary of the final report on the Minnesota Family Investment Program MDRC New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin-Epstein, J. (2003). Lifting the lid off the family cap: States revisit problematic policy for welfare mothers. Childbearing and Reproductive Health Series Brief No. 1. Washington D.C.: Center for Law and Social Policy

  • D. T. Lichter D. R. Graefe (2001) Finding a mate? The marital and cohabitation histories of unwed mothers L. L. B. Wu Wolfe (Eds) Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility Russell Sage Foundation New York 317–343

    Google Scholar 

  • D. T. Lichter R. Jayakody (2002) ArticleTitleWelfare reform: How do we measure success Annual Review of Sociology 28 117–141 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. C. Loury (2001) Preventing subsequent births to welfare recipients D. J. P. Besharov Germanis (Eds) Preventing subsequent births to welfare mothers University of Maryland School of Public Affairs College Park MD

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Manlove C. Mariner A. R. Papillo (2000) ArticleTitleSubsequent fertility among teen mothers: Longitudinal analyses of recent national data Journal of Marriage & the Family 62 430–448 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00430.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. D. P. J. Manning Smock (1995) ArticleTitleWhy marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabitors Journal of Marriage and the Family 58 998–1010 Occurrence Handle10.2307/353986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Martin B. E. Hamilton P. D. Sutton S. J. Ventura F. Menacker M. L. Munson (2003) Births: Final data for 2002. National vital statistics reports (vol. 52, no. 10) National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Martin M. M. Park P. D. Sutton (2002) Preliminary data for 2001. National vital statistics reports (vol. 50) National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. A. (1999). The effect of pre-PRWORA waivers on AFDC caseloads and female earnings, income, and labor force behavior. Paper presented at the ASSA Meetings. New York NY, January.

  • Moore, K. A. (1995). Executive summary: Report to congress on out-of-wedlock childbearing. (Full report available from DHHS Publication No. 95-1257-1). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Also available on the Internet at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchswww/nchshome.htm

  • K Musick (2002) ArticleTitlePlanned and unplanned childbearing among unmarried women Journal of Marriage and the Family 64 915–929 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00915.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. J. Nechyba (2001) ArticleTitleSocial approval, values, and AFDC: A reexamination of the illegitimate debate Journal of Political Economy 109 637–672 Occurrence Handle10.1086/321020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation (1997) Setting the baseline: A report on state welfare waivers U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • R. R. Rindfuss A. M. Parnell (1989) ArticleTitleThe varying connection between marital status and childbearing in the united states Population and Development Review 15 447–470

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Rosenzweig (1999) ArticleTitleWelfare, marital prospects, and nonmarital childbearing Journal of Political Economy 107 3–32 Occurrence Handle10.1086/250102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. H. Rossi (2001) New Jersey’s family development program: An overview and critique of the Rutgers’ evaluation D. J. P Besharov Germanis (Eds) Preventing subsequent births to welfare mothers University of Maryland School of Public Affairs College Park MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry-Humen, E., Manlove, J., & Moore, K. A. (2001). Births outside of marriage: Perceptions vs. Reality. Child Trends Research Brief. Washington, DC: Child Trends

  • C. Turturro B. Benda H. Turney (1997) Arkansas welfare waiver demonstration project final report University of Arkansas at Little Rock, School of Social Work Little Rock, AK

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. (1996). Public law 104–193: Personal responsibility and work opportunity reconciliation act of 1996: H.R. 3734, 1996

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameU.S. General Accounting Office (1997) Implications of increased work participation for child care U.S. General Accounting Office Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Upchurch L. A. Lillard C. W. A. Panis (2001) The impact of nonmarital childbearing on subsequent marital formation and dissolution L. L. B. Wu Wolfe (Eds) Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility Russell Sage Foundation New York 344–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, G., & Blank, R. (1999). What goes up must come down? Explaining recent changes in public assistance caseloads. Paper presented at the Conference on Welfare Reform and the Macroeconomy, Washington DC

  • P. E. Wilde S. Hofferth S. Stanhope M. Noonan N. Collins (2000) ArticleTitlePre-1997 trends in welfare and food assistance in a national sample of families American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 642–648 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0002-9092.00054

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Child Trends, 4301 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 100, Washington, DC, 20008, USA

    Suzanne Ryan & Jennifer Manlove

  2. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

    Sandra L. Hofferth

Authors
  1. Suzanne Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer Manlove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sandra L. Hofferth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne Ryan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryan, S., Manlove, J. & Hofferth, S.L. State-level Welfare Policies and Nonmarital Subsequent Childbearing. Popul Res Policy Rev 25, 103–126 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-006-0004-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-006-0004-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation