Skip to main content
Log in

Recurrence in childhood medulloblastoma

  • Clinical Study – Patient Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty-eight consecutive children treated according to the HIT2000 and HIT91 studies for medulloblastoma who suffered 40 recurrence events were identified from a neuroradiological database. Relapse was associated with younger median age compared with all children treated on HIT2000. Eight patients relapsed with isolated local recurrence. There was no correlation with incomplete surgical removal or violation of the respective treatment protocol. Four patients were younger than 4 years at time of initial presentation and thus were not treated primarily with radiotherapy, suggesting that delayed radiotherapy might be a contributing factor. Meningeal dissemination was present in 32 events; 16 were located in the frontal region, 8 of which were isolated nodular frontal and frontobasal meningeal disease. Circumscribed meningeal recurrences were associated with better overall survival (OS) compared with diffuse, widespread recurrences. Isolated frontobasal meningeal relapses are a well-known phenomenon in medulloblastomas even years after treatment and have been correlated to an underdose of radiation in many literature reports. However, in our patients there was no correlation to possible treatment violations, indicating that inadequate radiation dose to the frontobasal region was unlikely to be a causative factor. Surgical technique varied due to the multicentric nature of our study, so position during surgery was not recognized as a predisposing factor for frontobasal recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaatsch P, Rickert CH, Kühl J, Schüz J, Michaelis J (2001) Population-based epidemiologic data on brain tumours in German children. Cancer 92:3155–3164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Packer RJ, Rood BR, MacDonald TJ (2003) Medulloblastoma: present concepts of stratification into risk groups. Pediatr Neurosurg 39:60–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Finlay JL, Albright AL, Rorke LB, Milstein JM, Allen JC, Stevens KR, Stanley P, Li H, Wisoff JH, Geyer JR, McGuire-Cullen P, Stehbens JA, Shurin SB, Packer RJ (1999) Metastasis stage, adjuvant treatment, and residual tumor are prognostic factors for medulloblastoma in children: conclusions from the Children’s Cancer Group 921 randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 17:832–845

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kortmann RD, Kühl J, Timmermann B, Mittler U, Urban C, Budach V, Richter E, Willich N, Flentje M, Berthold F, Slavc I, Wolff J, Meisner C, Wiestler O, Soerensen N, Warmuth-Metz M, Bamberg M (2000) Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood: results of the German prospective randomized trial HIT’91. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46:269–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Inakoshi H, Kayamori R, Tsuchida E, Sakai K, Shibamoto Y, Wakushima H, Ogawa J, Kobayashi M, Obara T (2003) Multivariate analysis of dissemination relapse of medulloblastoma and estimation of its time parameter for craniospinal irradiation. Radiat Med 2:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bouffet E, Doz F, Demaille MC, Tron P, Roche H, Plantaz D, Thyss A, Stephan JL, Lejars O, Sariban E, Buclon M, Zücker JM, Brunat-Mentigny M, Bernard JL, Gentet JC (1998) Improving survival in recurrent medulloblastoma: earlier detection, better treatment or still an impasse? Br J Cancer 77:1321–1326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sure U, Bertalanffy H, Isenmann S, Brandner S, Berghorn WJ, Seeger W, Aguzzi A (1995) Secondary manifestation of medulloblastoma: metastases and local recurrences in 66 patients. Acta Neurochir 136:117–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rutkowski S, von Bueren AO, Warmuth-Metz M, Soerensen N, Deinlein F, Schlegel PG, Kühl J, Benesch M, Zwiener I, Faldum A, Pietsch T, Kortmann RD (2010) Treatment of children and adolescents with metastatic medulloblastoma by conventional chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Preliminary results of the prospective GPOH-trial HIT 2000 (MET HIT 2000 AB4). Neuro Oncol 12:ii5 (abstr)

  9. Von Hoff K, Hinkes B, Gerber N, Deinlein F, Mittler U, Urban C, Benesch M, Warmuth-Metz M, Soerensen N, Zwiener I, Goette H, Schlegel PG, Pietsch T, Kortmann RD, Kuehl J, Rutkowski S (2009) Long-term outcome and clinical prognostic factors in children with medulloblastomas treated in the prospective randomised multicentre trial HIT’91. Eur J Cancer 45:1209–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lannering B, Rutkowski S, Doz F, Pizer B, Gustafson G, Navajas A, Massimino M, Faldum A, Clifford S, Pietsch T, Kortmann R-D (2010) HIT-SIOP PNET4. A randomised multicentre study of hyperfractionated (HFRT) versus standard radiotherapy (StRT) in children with standard risk medulloblastoma. Neuro Oncol 12:ii5 (abstr)

  11. Von Bueren AO, Pietsch T, Warmuth-Metz M, Soerensen N, Deinlein F, Schlegel PG, Kühl J, Benesch M, Zwiener I, Faldum A, Kortmann RD, Rutkowski S (2010) Treatment of young children (<4 years) with medulloblastoma by chemotherapy alone. Interim results of the prospective multicenter GPOH-trial HIT 2000 (HIT 2000 BIS4) confirming the prognostic impact of histology. Neuro Oncol 12:ii7 (abstr)

  12. Rutkowski S, Bode U, Deinlein F, Ottensmeier H, Warmuth-Metz M, Soerensen N, Graf N, Emser A, Pietsch T, Wolff JE, Kortmann RD, Kühl J (2005) Treatment of early childhood medulloblastoma by postoperative chemotherapy alone. N Engl J Med 352:978–986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Rocco C, Iannelli A, Tancredi A (1995) Patterns of failure in surgical therapy of medulloblastomas. J Neurosurg Sci 39:1–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jenkin D, Shabanah MA, Shail EA, Gray A, Hassounah M, Khafaga Y, Kofide A, Mustafa M, Schultz H (2000) Prognostic factors for medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:573–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Evans AE, Jenkin RD, Sposto R, Ortega JA, Wilson CB, Wara W, Ertel IJ, Kramer S, Chang CH, Leikin SL (1990) The treatment of medulloblastoma. Results of a prospective randomized trial of radiation therapy with and without CCNU, vincristine, and prednisone. J Neurosurg 72:572–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grabenbauer GG, Beck JD, Erhardt J, Seegenschmiedt MH, Seyer H, Thierauf P, Sauer R (1996) Postoperative radiotherapy of medulloblastoma. Impact of radiation quality on treatment outcome. Am J Clin Oncol 19:73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Karlsson U, Kirby T, Orrison W, Lionberger M (1995) Ocular globe topography in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33:705–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miralbell R, Bleher A, Huguenin P, Ries G, Kann R, Mirimanoff RO, Notter M, Nouet P, Bieri S, Thum P, Toussi H (1997) Pediatric medulloblastoma: radiation treatment technique and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:523–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Halperin EC (1996) Impact of radiation technique upon the outcome of treatment for medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:233–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hardy DG, Hope-Stone HF, McKenzie CG, Scholtz CL (1978) Recurrence of medulloblastoma after homogeneous field radiotherapy. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 49:434–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carrie C, Hofstetter S, Gomez F, Moncho V, Doz F, Alapetite C, Murraciole X, Maire JP, Benhassel M, Chapet S, Quentin P, Kolodie H, Lagrange JL, Cuillere JC, Habrand JL (1999) Impact of targeting deviations on outcome in medulloblastoma: study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFOP). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:435–439

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Carrie C, Muracciole X, Gomez F, Habrand J-L, Benhassel M, Mege M, Mahe M, Quetin P, Maire JP, Soum F, Baron MH, Clavere P, Chapet S, Gaci Z, Kolodie H, Maingon P, Vie B, Bernier V, Alapetite C, Hoffstetter S, Grill J, Lafay F (2005) Conformal radiotherapy, reduced boost volume, hyperfractionated radiotherapy, and online quality control in standard risk medulloblastoma without chemotherapy: results of the French M-SFOP 98 protocol. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:711–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun L-M, Yeh S-A, Wang C-J, Huang E-Y, Chen H-C, Hsu H-C, Lee SP (2002) Postoperative radiation therapy for medulloblastoma—high recurrence rate in the subfrontal region. J Neurooncol 58:77–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor RE, Bailey CC, Robinson KJ, Weston CL, Ellison D, Ironside J, Lucraft H, Gilbertson R, Tait DM, Saran F, Walker DA, Pizer BL, Lashford LS (2004) Impact of radiotherapy parameters on outcome in the International Society of Paediatric Oncology/United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group PNET-3 study of preradiotherapy chemotherapy for M0–M1 medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:1184–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the German Children’s Cancer Foundation (Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung). The authors want to thank Duncan Stearns M.D. for his very valuable help in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Warmuth-Metz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warmuth-Metz, M., Blashofer, S., von Bueren, A.O. et al. Recurrence in childhood medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol 103, 705–711 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0452-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0452-x

Keywords

Navigation