Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neutral model analysis of landscape patterns from mathematical morphology

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mathematical morphology encompasses methods for characterizing land-cover patterns in ecological research and biodiversity assessments. This paper reports a neutral model analysis of patterns in the absence of a structuring ecological process, to help set standards for comparing and interpreting patterns identified by mathematical morphology on real land-cover maps. We considered six structural classes (core, perforated, edge, connector, branch, and patch) on randomly generated binary (forest, non-forest) maps in which the percent occupancy (P) of forest varied from 1% to 99%. The maps were dominated by the patch class for low P, by the branch and connector classes for intermediate P, and by the edge, perforated, and core classes for high P. Two types of pattern phase changes were signaled by abrupt transitions among the six structural classes, at critical P thresholds that were indicated by increased variance among maps for the same P. A phase change from maps dominated by the patch class to maps dominated by the branch and connector classes was related to the existence of a percolating cluster of forest, and the P threshold varied depending on the co-existence of the core class. A second phase change from the edge class to the perforated class was related to the existence of a percolating cluster of non-core (including non-forest) and represents a change of context from exterior to interior. Our results appear to be the first demonstration of multiple phase changes controlling different aspects of landscape pattern on random neutral maps. Potential applications of the results are illustrated by an analysis of ten real forest maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caswell H (1976) Community structure: a neutral model analysis. Ecol Monogr 46:327–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemark K, Bert D, Villard M-A (2002) Patch-, landscape-, and regional-scale effects on biota. In: Gutzwiller KJ (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer-Verlag, New York NY, pp 58–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RH (1999) RULE: a program for the generation of random maps and the analysis of spatial patterns. In: Klopatek JM, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp 280–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RH, Milne BT, Turner MG, O’Neill RV (1987) Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 1:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (1991) Pattern, process and predictability: the use of neutral models for landscape analysis. In: Turner MG, Gardner RH (eds) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp 289–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Geographic Data Technology (2002) Dynamap/2000 user manual. Geographic Data Technology, Inc., Lebanon, NH

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ, Parker GR (1992) Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landsc Ecol 7:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne BT (1992) Spatial aggregation and neutral models in fractal landscapes. Am Nat 139:32–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis G, Prigogine I (1989) Exploring complexity: an introduction. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV, Gardner RH, Turner MG (1992) A hierarchical neutral model for landscape analysis. Landsc Ecol 7:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson SM, Gardner RH (1997) Neutral models: useful tools for understanding landscape patterns. In Bissonette JA (ed) Wildlife and landscape ecology: effects of pattern and scale. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp 215–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotnick RE, Gardner RH (1993) Lattices and landscapes. In: Gardner RH (ed) Lectures on mathematics in the life sciences: predicting spatial effects in ecological systems. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp 129–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB, Smith ER (2000) Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Ecol Soc 4(2):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, Wickham JD, Coulston JW (2004) Use of road maps in United States national assessments of forest fragmentation. Ecol Soc 9(2):13

    Google Scholar 

  • Soille P (2003) Morphological image analysis: principles and applications, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer D, Aharony A (1994) Introduction to percolation theory, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran LT, O’Neill RV, Smith ER (2006) A generalized distance measure for integrating multiple environmental assessment indicators. Landsc Ecol 21:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelmann JE, Howard SM Yang L, Larson CR, Wylie BK, Van Driel N (2001) Completion of the 1990s national land cover data set for the conterminous United States from Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources. Photogram Eng Remote Sensing 67:650–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt P, Riitters KH, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Wade TG, Wickham JD (2007a) Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landsc Ecol 22:171–177. doi: 10.1007/s10980–006-9013-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt P, Riitters KH, Iwanowski M, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Soille P (2007b) Mapping landscape corridors. Ecol Indic 7:481–488. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA, King AW (1997) The use and misuse of neutral landscape models in ecology. Oikos 79:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research described in this article was performed as a part of the Collaboration Agreement (No. 22832-2005-06 S0SC ISP) between the European Commission - DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability and the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. KR acknowledges support from the Strategic Planning and Resource Assessment Staff, USDA Forest Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt H. Riitters.

Additional information

The U.S. Government's right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright is acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riitters, K.H., Vogt, P., Soille, P. et al. Neutral model analysis of landscape patterns from mathematical morphology. Landscape Ecol 22, 1033–1043 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9089-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9089-3

Keywords

Navigation