Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Career development and project planning for emerging thermal analysis scientists

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advances in science and technology are now at the heart of the global economy, but the number of students earning degrees in the sciences, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields has stalled. According to the National Association for Colleges and Employers (NACE), programs have been initiated nationwide to nurture interest in the sciences, including research competitions, co-ops and internships, and K-12 STEM education. Senior thermal analysis scientists are not only researchers, they are role models, mentors and teachers intimately involved in the recruitment and training of young scientists. The authors present guidelines for thermal analysis research project planning for high school students, undergraduate students and master’s and doctoral candidates. Project planning includes developmentally appropriate techniques, methods, instruments, scope and significance. Case studies illustrate examples of short-term, concrete materials analysis projects tailored to younger student researchers, as well as master’s level projects making significant contributions to the state of the science and innovative doctoral research. In addition to designing projects for students at all levels, senior thermal analysis scientists can use specific teaching and training techniques to help young scientists develop their abilities in the lab and at the podium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Terrell N. Science technology engineering mathematics occupations. Occup Outlook Q. 2007;51(1):26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tanaka H, Koga N. Thermal analysis and kinetics of solid-state reactions: its application to education in chemistry. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1999;56:855–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hakvoort G, Hakvoort TE. A practical thermal analysis course. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1997;49:1715–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Riga A, Bracone N, O’Connor A, Somrack A, Oberoi L, Alexander K. Thermal analysis in university research and undergraduate teaching labs. In: Proceedings of 32nd NATAS conference; 2004. p. 104.

  5. Wunderlich B. Teaching thermal analysis of polymeric materials. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2000;59:7–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sørensen OT. A new dimension in thermal analysis: virtual class-room teaching over the Internet. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2005;80:793–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. Reinventing undergraduate education: a blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook: State University of New York at Stony Brook for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1998.

  8. Suga H. Prospects of materials science: from crystalline to amorphous solids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2000;60:957–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Short N, Riga AT, Dutra de Souza KC, Alexander KS. Thermal and analytical characterization of a polymorphic drug: nifedipine. In: Proceedings of 33rd NATAS conference; 2005. disk paper.

  10. Zaboura D, Riga AT, Short N, Dutra de Souza KC, Alexander KS. Thermal and analytical characterization of a polymorphic drug: tolbutamide. In: Proceedings of 33rd NATAS conference; 2005. disk paper.

  11. Najjar O, Matthews ME, Presswala L, Atkinson I, Gerhardstein N, Moran J, Wei R, Riga AT. Essential physical-chemical properties of d and l amino acids by thermal and analytical methods. Podium Presentation, American Chemical Society Meeting-in-Miniature, Notre Dame College, South Euclid, Ohio; 2007.

  12. Maheswaram MPK, Riga A, Alexander K. (2009). An innovative dielectric method determined the crystalline and amorphous content in pharmaceuticals. Poster, College of Science Research Day 2009, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio. http://www.csuohio.edu/sciences/researchday/2009/abstracts09.pdf.

  13. Seymour E, Hunter A-B, Laursen SL, DeAntoni T. Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: first findings from a three-year study. Sci Educ. 2004;88(4):493–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Adhikari N, Nolan D. “But what good came of it at last?”: how to assess the value of undergraduate research. Not AMS. 2002;49(10):1252–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barlow A, Villarejo M. Making a difference for minorities: evaluation of an education enrichment program. J Res Sci Teach. 2004;41(9):861–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon EW, Bridglall BL. Creating excellence and increasing ethnic minority leadership in science, engineering, mathematics and technology: a study of the Meyerhoff Scholars Program at the University of Maryland-Baltimore County; 2004. Retrieved April 15, 2010 from http://www.ncrel.org/gap/studies/meyerhoff.pdf.

  17. Hathaway R, Nagda B, Gregerman S. The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional educational pursuit: an empirical study. J Coll Stud Dev. 2002;43(5):614–31.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hunter AB, Laursen SA, Seymour E. Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal and professional development. Sci Educ. 2006;91:36–74.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kremer JF, Bringle RG. The effects of intensive research experience on the careers of talented undergraduates. J Res Dev Educ. 1990;24(1):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lopatto D. Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007;6(4):297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Russell SH, Hancock MP, McCullogh J. The pipeline: benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science. 2007;316:548–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wenderholm E. Challenges and the elements of success in undergraduate research. SIGSCE Bull. 2004;36(4):73–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bauer KW, Bennett JS. Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. J Higher Educ. 2003;74(2):210–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopatto D. The essential features of undergraduate research. CUR Q. 2003;23:139–42.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lopatto D. Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): first findings. Cell Biol Educ. 2004;3:270–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mabrouk P, Peters K. Student perspectives on undergraduate research experiences in chemistry and biology. CUR Q. 2000;21:25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mervis J. Student research: what is it good for? Science. 2001;293:1614–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nagda BA, Gregerman SR, Jonides J, von Hippel W, Lerner JS. Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Rev High Educ. 1998;22(1):55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pearson M, Brew A. Research training and supervision development. Stud High Educ. 2002;27:135–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Russell SH. Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate research opportunities: 2003 NSF program participant survey (Draft Final Report to the NSF). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. 2005. Retrieved April 15, 2010 from http://www.sri/com/policy/csted/reports/.

  31. Summers MF, Hrabowski FA. Preparing minority scientists and engineers. Science. 2006;311:1870–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang BL, Gan YH. Preparing the senior or graduating student for graduate research. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2005;33:277–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tomovic MM. Undergraduate research—prerequisite for successful lifelong learning. ASEE Conf Proc. 1994;1:1469–70.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ward C, Bennett J, Bauer K. Content analysis of undergraduate research student evaluations. 2002. Retrieved April 15, 2010 from http://www.udel.edu/RARE.

  35. Zydney A, Bennett JS, Shahid A, Bauer K. Impact of undergraduate research experience in engineering. J Eng Educ. 2002;19(2):151–7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zydney A, Bennett JS, Shahid A, Bauer K. Faculty perspectives regarding the undergraduate research experience in science and engineering. J Eng Educ. 2002;19(3):291–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Buckeye Pharmaceuticals, 23715 Mercantile Road, Beachwood, OH, 44122, USA

    M. Ellen Matthews

  2. Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Health Professions, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, 44115, USA

    Alan T. Riga

Authors
  1. M. Ellen Matthews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan T. Riga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan T. Riga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, M.E., Riga, A.T. Career development and project planning for emerging thermal analysis scientists. J Therm Anal Calorim 106, 33–38 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-010-1235-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-010-1235-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation