Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors Affecting Hispanic Women’s Participation in Screening for Cervical Cancer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hispanic women’s cervical cancer rates are disproportionately high. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was used as a theoretical framework to explore beliefs, attitudes, socio-economic, and cultural factors influencing Hispanic women’s decisions about cervical cancer screening. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Hispanic women 18–65 years old (n = 205) in the Upstate of South Carolina. Generalized Linear Modeling was used. Across all models, perceived threats (susceptibility and severity), self-efficacy, and the interaction of benefits and barriers were significant predictors. Significant covariates included age, marital status, income, regular medical care, and familism. A modified HBM was a useful model for examining cervical cancer screening in this sample of Hispanic women. The inclusion of external, or social factors increased the strength of the HBM as an explanatory model. The HBM can be used as a framework to design culturally appropriate cervical cancer screening interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2009. Atlanta, GA, 2009. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@nho/documents/document/500809webpdf.pdf.

  2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. Rockville, MD: USPSTF Program Office; 2012. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/3rduspstf/cervcan/cervcanrr.htm.

  3. National Cancer Policy Board, IOM. Fulfilling the potential of cancer prevention and early detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.

  4. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Cancer screening. US Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(51):1038–42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2020 topics and objectives: cancer. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=5.

  6. White K, Garces IC, Bandura L, et al. Design and evaluation of a theory-based, culturally relevant outreach model for breast and cervical cancer screening for Latina immigrants. Ethn Dis. 2012;22(3):274–80.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American Cancer Society. Cervical cancer. Prevention and early detection. Atlanta, GA, 2013. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/003167-pdf.pdf.

  8. Peirson L, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, et al. Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2013;2(35):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meissner BN, Taubman ML, et al. Which women aren’t getting mammograms and why? (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18(1):61–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Erwin DO, Treviño M, Saad-Harfouche FG, et al. Contextualizing diversity and culture within cancer control interventions for Latinas: changing interventions, not cultures. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(4):693–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beach ML, Flood AB, Robinson CM, et al. Can language-concordant preventive care managers improve cancer screening rates? Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16(10):2058–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control. Health United States, 2012. Washington DC: DHHS Publication No. 2013-1232.2013, 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus12.pdf.

  13. Parra-Medina D, Hilfinger DK, Fore E, et al. The partnership for cancer prevention: addressing access to cervical cancer screening among Latinas in South Carolina. JSC Med Assoc. 2009;105(7):297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  14. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2012. Atlanta, GA, 2012. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-033423.pdf.

  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cervical cancer rates by race and ethnicity. Atlanta, GA, 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cervical/statistics/race.htm.

  16. Arredondo EM, Pollak K, Costanzo PR, et al. Evaluating a stage model in predicting monolingual Spanish-speaking Latinas’ cervical cancer screening practices: the role of psychosocial and cultural predictors. Health Educ Behav. 2008;35(6):791–805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abraido-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Gammon MD. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas and non-Latina Whites. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(8):1393–98.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Janz NK, Champion VL, Strecher VJ. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, editors. Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ben-Natan M, Adir O. Screening for cervical cancer among Israeli lesbian women. Int Nurs Rev. 2009;56:433–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lopez R, McMahan S. College women’s perception and knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer. Calif J Health Promot. 2007;5(3):12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Montgomery K, Bloch JR, Bhattacharya A, et al. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer knowledge, health beliefs, and preventative practices in older women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009;39(3):238–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tracy JK, Lydecker AD, Ireland L. Barriers to cervical cancer screening among lesbians. J Womens Health Issues Care. 2010;19(2):229–37.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Urrutia MT, Hall R. Beliefs about cervical cancer and Pap test: a new Chilean questionnaire. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013;45(2):126–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:328–35.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosentock IM, et al. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Palmer R, Fernandez ME, Tortolero-Luna G, et al. Acculturation and mammography screening among Hispanic women living in farmworker communities. Cancer Control. 2005;12:21–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramirez AG, Suarez L, McAlister A, et al. Cervical cancer screening in regional Hispanic populations. Am J Health Behav. 2000;24(3):181–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sussner KM, Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, et al. Acculturation and familiarity with, attitudes towards and beliefs about genetic testing for cancer risk within Latinas in East Harlem, New York City. J Genet Couns. 2009;18(1):60–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenstock IM. Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(3):94–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hayden J. Introduction to health behavior theory. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vadaparampil ST, Champion VL, Miller TK, et al. Using the health belief model to examine differences in adherence to mammography among African-American and Caucasian women. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2003;2(4):59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Clark NM, Becker MH. Theoretical models and strategies for improving adherence and disease management. In: Shumaker SS, et al., editors. The handbook of health behavior change. New York, NY: Springer; 1998. p. 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, et al. Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the health belief model. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008;12(3):232–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Espinosa de los Monteros K, Gallo LC. The relevance of fatalism in the study of Latinas’ cancer screening behavior: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Behav Med. 2011;18(4):310–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Boyer LE, Williams M, Calker LC, et al. Hispanic women’s perceptions regarding cervical cancer screening. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2000;30:240–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Erwin DO, Treviño M, Saad-Harfouche FG, et al. Contextualizing diversity and culture within cancer control interventions for Latinas: changing interventions, not cultures. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:693–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Siatkowski A. Hispanic acculturation: a concept analysis. J Transcult Nurs. 2007;18(4):316–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu ZH, Black SA, Markides KS. Prevalence and associated factors of cancer screening: why are so many older Mexican American women never screened? Prev Med. 2001;33:268–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Marín G, Marín BVO. Research with Hispanic populations. Applied social research methods series. California: Sage; 1991. p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sabogal F, Marín G, Otero-Sabogal R, et al. Hispanic familism and acculturation: what changes and what doesn’t? Hisp J Behav Sci. 1987;9(4):397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gaines S, Marelich W, Bledsoe K, et al. Links between race/ethnicity and cultural values as mediated by racial/ethnic identity and moderated by gender. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72:1460–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Abraido-Lanza AF, Viladrich A, Florez KR, et al. Fatalismo reconsidered: a cautionary note for health-related research and practice with Latino populations. Ethn Dis. 2003;17:153–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Antshel KM. Integrating culture as a means of improving treatment adherence in the Latino population. Psychol Health Med. 2002;7(4):435–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Powe BD, Finnie R. Cancer fatalism: the state of the science. Cancer Nurs. 2003;26(6):454–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Scarinci IC, Beech BM, Kovach KW, et al. An examination of sociocultural factors associated with cervical cancer screening among low-income Latina immigrants of reproductive age. J Immigr Health. 2003;5(3):119–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Byrd TL, et al. Cervical cancer screening beliefs among young Hispanic women. Prev Med. 2004;38(2):192–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fulton J, et al. Determinants of breast cancer screening among inner-city Hispanic women in comparison with other inner-city women. Public Health Rep. 1995;110(4):476–82.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mandelblatt JS, et al. Breast and cervix cancer screening among multiethnic women: role of age, health, and source of care. Prev Med. 1999;28:418–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Urrutia MT. Development and testing of a questionnaire: beliefs about cervical cancer and Pap test in Chilean women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami; 2009.

  50. Bracken BA, Barona A. State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment. Sch Psychol Int. 1991;12(1–2):119–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Marín G, Gamba RJ. A new measurement of acculturation for Hispanics: the bidimensional acculturation scale for Hispanics (BAS). Hisp J Behav Sci. 1996;18:297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lugo-Steidel AG, Contreras JM. A new familism scale for use with Latino populations. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2003;25(3):312–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lopez-McKee G, et al. Spanish translation and cultural adaptation of the Powe fatalism inventory. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2007;39(1):68–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Watts L, et al. Understanding barriers to cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(2):199.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ries LA, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2005. Bethesda, MD, 2008. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/.

  56. Allahverdipour H, Emami A. Perceptions of cervical cancer threat, benefits, and barriers of papanicolaou smear screening programs for women in Iran. Women Health. 2008;47(3):23–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Parra-Medina D, et al. The partnership for cancer prevention: addressing access to cervical cancer screening among Latinas in South Carolina. JSC Med Assoc. 2009;105(7):297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fernandez-Esquer ME, Espinoza P, Torres I, et al. A su salud: a quasi-experimental study among Mexican American women. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27(5):536–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bazargan M, Bazargan SH, Farooq M, et al. Correlates of cervical cancer screening among underserved Hispanic and African-American women. Prev Med. 2004;39(3):465–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Owusu GA, Brown S, Cready CM, et al. Race and ethnic disparities in cervical cancer screening in a safety-net system. Matern Child Health J. 2005;9(3):285–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Suarez L. Pap smear and mammogram screening in Mexican-American women: the effects of acculturation. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(5):742–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Marin G, Triandis HC. Allocentrism as an important characteristic of the behavior of Latin Americans and Hispanics. In: Diaz-Guerrero R, editor. Cross-cultural and national studies of social psychology. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kreuter MW, Lezin N. Social capital theory: implications for community-based health promotion. In: Clemente D, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, editors. Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: strategies for improving public health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute on Family and Neighborhood Life, Clemson University, 2038 Barre Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA

    Arelis Moore de Peralta & James R. McDonell

  2. Institute on Family and Neighborhood Life, School of Nursing, Clemson University, 2038 Barre Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA

    Bonnie Holaday

Authors
  1. Arelis Moore de Peralta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bonnie Holaday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James R. McDonell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arelis Moore de Peralta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore de Peralta, A., Holaday, B. & McDonell, J.R. Factors Affecting Hispanic Women’s Participation in Screening for Cervical Cancer. J Immigrant Minority Health 17, 684–695 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-9997-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-9997-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation