Abstract
This paper presents a framework for the generation of coherent elementary conversational sequences at the speech act level. We will embrace the notion of a cooperative dialogue game in which two players produce speech acts to transfer relevant information with respect to their commitments. Central to the approach is that participants try to achieve some sort of balanced cognitive state as a result of speech act generation and interpretation. Cognitive states of the participants change as a result of the interpretation of speech acts and these changes provoke the production of a subsequent speech act. Describing the properties and the dynamics of the mental constructs that constitute the participants’ cognitive states, such as beliefs and commitments, in relation to the various dialogue contributions is an essential aspect of the game. Although simple in its basic form, the framework enables us to produce abstract conversations with some properties that agree strikingly with coherence structures found in, for instance, Conversation Analysis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ahn R., Beun R., Borghuis T., Bunt H., Overveld C.v. (1995). The DenK-architecture: A fundamental approach to user-interfaces. Artificial Intelligence Review 8(9): 431–445
Allwood J., Nivre J., Ahlsen E. (1992). On the semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback. Journal of Semantics 9, 1–26
Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., & Parsons, S. (2000). Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on multiAgent systems (ICMAS 2000), (pp. 31–38). Boston (MA)
Asher N., Lascarides A. (1998). Questions in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(2): 237–309
Austin J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, Clarendon Press
Bateman J., Rondhuis K. (1997). Coherence relations: Towards a general specification. Discourse Processes 24, 3–49
Beun R. (2001). On the generation of coherent dialogue: A computational approach. Pragmatics and Cognition 9(1): 37–68
Bunt H. (1989). Information dialogues as communicative action in relation to partner modelling and information processing. In: Taylor , Néel F., Bouwhuis D. (eds) The structure of multimodal dialogue. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 47–73
Carlson L. (1985). Dialogue games. An approach to discourse analysis. Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company
Clark H., Marshall C. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In: Joshi A., Webber B., Sag I. (eds) Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–63
Cohen P., Levesque H. (1990). Persistence, intention and commitment. In: Cohen P., Morgan J., Pollack M. (eds) Intentions and Communication. Cambridge Mass, MIT Press, pp. 33–69
Gatt, A., & van Deemter, K. (2006). Conceptual coherence in the generation of referring expressions. In Proceedings of the workshop on coherence for generation and dialogue (ESSLLI 2006) (pp. 17–24). Malaga.
Gernsbacher M., Givón T. (1995). Coherence in spontaneous text. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company
Givón T. (1995). Coherence in Text vs. Coherence in Mind. In: Gernsbacher M., Givón T. (eds) Coherence in spontaneous text. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 59–115
Grice H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In: Cole P., Morgan J. (eds) Speech acts. syntax and semantics, Vol. 11. New York, Academic Press, pp. 41–58
Grosz B., Sidner C. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12(3): 175–204
Hamblin C. (1971). Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37, 130–155
Hobbs J. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3(1): 67–90
Hulstijn, J. (2000). Dialogue models for inquiry and transaction. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente.
Hulstijn, J., Dignum, F., & Dastani, M. (2005). Coherence constraints for agent interaction. In R. v. Eijk, M.-P. Huget, & F. Dignum (Eds.), Agent Communication, (Vol. 3396 of LNAI. pp. 134–152). Springer-Verlag.
Hutchins, E. (1989). Metaphors for interface design. In (Taylor et al., 1989), (pp. 11–28).
Kibble R., Power R. (2004). Optimizing referential coherence in text generation. Computational Linguistics 30(4): 401–416
Larsson S., Traum D. (2000). Information state and dialogue management in the TRINDI dialogue move Engine Toolkit. Natural Language Engineering 6(3–4): 323–340
Levinson S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Longacre R.E. (1996). The grammar of discourse. New York, Plenum Press
Maslow A. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York, Harper and Row
Piwek, P. (1998). Logic, information & conversation. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
Piwek, P. (2006). Meaning and dialogue coherence. In Proceedings of the workshop on coherence for generation and dialogue (ESSLLI 2006). Malaga, pp. 57–64.
Polanyi L. (1988). A formal model of the structure of discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 12, 601–638
Power R. (1979). The organisation of purposeful dialogues. Linguistics 17, 107–152
Redeker G. (1990). Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 14, 367–381
Rickheit G., Strohner H. (1992). Towards a cognitive theory of linguistic coherence. Theoretical Linguistics 18(2/3): 209–237
Sanders T., Noordman L. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes 29(1): 37–60
Sanders T., Spooren W., Noordman L. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15(1): 1–35
Singh M. (1999). An ontology for commitments in multi-agent systems: toward a unification of normative concepts. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 97–113
Traum, D. R. (1994). A computational theory of grounding in natural language conversation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester. Technical Report 545.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Beun, RJ., van Eijk, R.M. Dialogue Coherence: A Generation Framework. J of Log Lang and Inf 16, 365–385 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-007-9050-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-007-9050-5