Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Internal Defibrillation: Where we Have Been and Where we Should be Going?

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internal cardioversion has been developed as an alternative technique for patients who are resistant to external DC cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and was found to be associated with higher success rates. It used initially high energies (200–300 J) delivered between an intracardiac catheter and a backplate. Subsequent studies have shown that it is possible to terminate with energies of 1 to 6 Joules, paroxysmal or induced AF in 90 percent of patients and persistent AF in 75 percent of patients, using biphasic shocks delivered between a right atrium-coronary sinus vectors. Consequently, internal atrial defibrillation can be performed under sedation only without the need for general anesthesia. Recently developed external defibrillators, capable of delivering biphasic shocks, have increased the success rates of external cardioversion and reduced the need for internal cardioversion. However, internal defibrillation is still useful in overweight or obese patients, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma who are more difficult to defibrillate, and in patients with implanted devices which may be injured by high energy shocks. Low energy internal defibrillation has also proven to be safe and this has prompted the development of implantable devices for terminating AF. The first device used was the Metrix system, a stand-alone atrial defibrillator (without ventricular defibrillation) which was found to be safe and effective in selected groups of patients. Unfortunately, this device is no longer being marketed. Only double chamber defibrillators with pacing capabilities are presently available: the Medtronic GEM III AT, an updated version of the Jewel AF and the Guidant PRIZM AVT. These devices can be patient-activated or programmed to deliver automatically ounce atrial tachyarrhythmias are detected, therapies including pacing or/and shocks. Attempts to define the group of patients who might benefit from these devices are described but the respective role of atrial defibrillators versus other non-pharmacologic therapies for AF, such as surgery and radiofrequency catheter ablation, remains to be determined. Advantages and limitations or atrial defibrillators and approaches to reduce shock related discomfort which may be a concern in some patients, are reviewed. Studies have shown that despite shock discomfort, quality of life was improved in patients with atrial defibrillators and the need for repeated hospitalizations was reduced. The cost of these devices remains a concern for the treatment of a non-lethal arrhythmia. Attention that atrial defibrillators will receive from cardiologists and from the industry in the future, will depend of the long-term results of other non-pharmacological options and of the identification of the group of AF patients which will require restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. But there is no doubt that selected subsets of patients with AF could benefit from atrial defibrillation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wyse DG, for the AFFIRM Investigators: Survival in patients presenting with atrial fibrillation: The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1825–1833.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, Kingma JH, Kamp O, Kingma T, Said SA, Darmanata JI, Timmermans AJ, Tijssen JG, Crijns HJ; Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Study Group. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1834–1840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lévy S, Lauribe Ph. Dolla E, Kou W, Kadish A, Calkins H, Pagannelli F, Moyal C, Bremondy M, Schork A. A randomized comparison of external and internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1992;86:1415–1420.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitchell AR, Spurrell PA, Boodhoo LE, Sulke N. Long-term care of the patient with the atrial defibrillator. Am Heart J 2004;147:210–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper RAS, Alferness CA, Smith WN, Ideker RE. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep. Circulation 1993;87:1673–1686.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murgatroyd FD, Slade AK, Sopher SM, Rowland E, Ward DE, Camm AJ. Efficacy and tolerability of transvenous low energy cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1347–1353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alt E, Schmitt C, Ammer R, Coenen M, Fotuhi P, Karch M, Blasini R. Initial experience with intracardiac atrial defibrillation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994;17:1067–1078.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lévy S, Ricard P, Lau CP, Lok NS, Camm AJ, Murgatroyd FD, Jordaens LJ, Kappenberger LJ, Brugada P, Ripley KL. Multicenter low energy transvenous atrial defibrillation (XAD) trial results in different subsets of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:750–755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lévy S, Ricard P, Gueunoun M, Yapo F, Trigano J, Mansouri C, Paganelli F. Low-energy cardioversion of spontaneous atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1997;96:253–259.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saksena S, Prakash A, Mangeon L, Varanasi S, Kolettis T, Mathew P, De Groot P, Mehra R, Krol RB. Clinical efficacy and safety of atrial defibrillation using biphasic shocks and current nonthoracotomy endocardial lead configurations. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:913–921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ammer R, Lehmann G, Plewan A, Puetter K, Alt E. Marked reduction in atrial defibrillation thresholds with repeated internal cardioversion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1569–1576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper RA, Plumb VJ, Epstein AE, Kay GN, Ideker RE. Marked reduction in internal atrial defibrillation thresholds with dual-current pathways and sequential shocks in humans. Circulation 1998;97:2527–2535.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boriani G, Biffi M, Capucci A, Bronzetti G, Ayers GM, Zannoli R, Branzi A, Magnani B. Favorable effects of flecainide in transvenous internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:333–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lau CP, Lok NS. A comparison of transvenous atrial defibrillation of acute and chronic atrial fibrillation and the effect of intravenous sotalol on human atrial defibrillation threshold. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997;20:2442–2452.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ayers GM, Alferness CA, Ilina M, Wagner DO, Sirokman WA, Adams JM, Griffin JC. Ventricular proarrhythmic effects of ventricular cycle length and shock strength in a sheep model of transvenous atrial defibrillation. Circulation 1994;89:413–422.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gray RA, Jalife J. Effects of atrial defibrillation shocks on the ventricles in isolated sheep hearts. Circulation 1998;97:1613–1622.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keelan ET, Krum D, Hare J, Mughal K, Li H, Akhtar M, Jazayeri MR. Safety of atrial defibrillation shocks synchronized to narrow and wide QRS complexes during atrial pacing protocols simulating atrial fibrillation in dogs. Circulation 1997;96:2022–2030.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Simons GR, Newby KH, Kearney MM, Brandon MJ, Natale A. Safety of transvenous low energy cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia: Effects of rate and repolarization time on proarrhythmic risk. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:430–437.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murgatroyd FD, Johnson EE, Cooper RA, et al. Safety of low energy transvenous defibrillation—World experience (abstract). Circulation 1995;90:I14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barold H, Warton JM. Ventricular fibrillation resulting from synchronized internal defibrillation in a patient with ventricular preexcitation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997;8:436–440.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sra J, Biehl M, Blanck Z, Dhala A, Jazayeri MR, Deshpande S, Akhtar M. Spontaneous reinitiation of atrial fibrillation following transvenous atrial defibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1105–1110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tse HF, Lau CP, Ayers GM. Incidence and modes of onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion, and its prevention by intravenous sotalol. Heart 1999;82:319–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wijffels MC, Kirchhof CJ, Dorland R, Allessie MA. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation: A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation 1995;92:1954–1968.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Franz MR, Karasik PL, Li C, Moubarak J, Chavez M. Electrical remodeling of the human atrium: Similar effects in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1785–1792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Allessie MA, Konings K, Kirchhof CJ, Wijffels M. Electrophysiologic mechanisms of perpetuation of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:10A–23A.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hobbs WJ, Fynn S, Todd DM, Wolfson P, Galloway M, Garratt CJ. Reversal of atrial electrical remodeling after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 2000;14;101:1145–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schmitt C, Alt E, Plewan A, Ammer R, Leibig M, Karch M, Schomig A. Low energy intracardiac cardioversion after failed conventional external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:994–999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wellens HJ, Lau CP, Lüderitz B, Akhtar M, Waldo AL, Camm AJ, Timmermans C, Tse HF, Jung W, Jordaens L, Ayers G, for the METRIX Investigators. Atrioverter: An implantable device for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1998;98:1651–1656.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Timmermans C, Levy S, Ayers GM, Jung W, Jordaens L, Rosenqvist M, Thibault B, Camm J, Rodriguez LM, Wellens HJ. Spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation after implantation of the Metrix Atrioverter: Observations on treated and nontreated episodes. Metrix Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1428–1433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Daoud EG, Timmermans C, Fellows C, Hoyt R, Lemery R, Dawson K, Ayers GM. Initial clinical experience with ambulatory use of an implantable atrial defibrillator for conversion of atrial fibrillation. Metrix Investigators. Circulation 2000;102:1407–1413.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Geller JC, Reek S, Timmermans C, Kayser T, Tse HF, Wolpert C, Jung W, Camm AJ, Lau CP, Wellens HJ, Klein HU. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with an implantable atrial defibrillator: Long term results. Eur Heart J 2003;24:2083–2089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jung W, Luderitz B. Implantation of an arrhythmia management system for ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Lancet 1997;349:853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schoels W, Swerdlow CD, Jung W, Stein KM, Seidl K, Haffajee CJ; Worldwide Jewel AF Investigators. Worldwide clinical experience with a new dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001;12:521–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Adler SW 2nd, Wolpert C, Warman EN, Musley SK, Koehler JL, Euler DE. Efficacy of pacing therapies for treating atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with ventricular arrhythmias receiving a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Circulation 2001;104:887–892.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Swerdlow CD, Schwartzman D, Hoyt R, Balin SJ, Koehler Jl, Warman EN. Worldwide Model 7250 AF-only Investigators. Determinants of first-shock success for atrial implantable cardioverter defibrillators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002;13:347–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cooper JM, Katcher MS, Orlov MV. Implantable devices for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;346:2062–2068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gillis AM, Unterberg-Buchwald C, Schmidinger H, Massimo S, Wolfe K, Kavaney DJ, Otterness MF, Hohnloser SH; GEM III AT Worldwide Investigators. Safety and efficacy of advanced atrial pacing therapies for atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with a new implantable dual chamber cardioverter-defibrillator. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1653–1659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stoddard MF, Dawkins PR, Prince CR, Ammash NM. Left atrial appendage thrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recent embolic event: A transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:452–459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schwartzman D, Hoyt RH, Sulke N, et al. Patterns of coumadin use and cerebrovascular accident in patients implanted with the Jewel AF device. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001;24:639.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lok NS, Lau CP, Tse HF, Ayers GM. Clinical shock tolerability and effect of different right atrial electrode locations on efficacy of low energy human transvenous atrial defibrillation using an implantable lead system. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1324–1330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Steinhaus DM, Cardinal DS, Mongeon L, Musley SK, Foley L, Corrigan S. Internal defibrillation: Pain perception of low energy shocks. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:1090–1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mitchell AR, Spurrell PA, Boodhoo L, Sulke N. Psychosocial aspects of patient-activated atrial defibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003;14:812–816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Haffajee CI, Chaudhry GM, Casavant D, Pacetti PE. Efficacy and tolerability of automatic nighttime atrial fibrillation shocks in patients with permanent internal atrial defibrillators. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:875–876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mitchell AR, Spurrell PA, Gerritse BE, Sulke N. Improving the acceptability of the atrial defibrillator for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: The atrial defibrillator sedation assessment study (ADSAS). Int J Cardiol 2004;96:141–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Spurrell P, MitchellA, Kamalvand K, Sulke N. Quality of life after use of the patient activated atrial defibrillator. Am Heart J 2003;145:569–570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Newman DM, Dorian P, Paquette M, Sulke N, Gold MR, Schwartzman DS, Schaaf K, Wood K, Johnson L. Worldwide Jewel AF-only Investigators. Effect of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator with atrial detection and shock therapies on patient-perceived, health-related quality of life. Am Heart J 2003;145:841–846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ricci R, Quesada A, Pignalberi C, Roda J, Disertori M, Capucci A, Raviele A, Santini M. Dual defibrillator improves quality of life and decreases hospitalizations in patients with drug refractory atrial fibrillation. J Interv Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004;10:85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of Marseille, Chemin des Bourrellys, 13015, Hopital Nord, Marseille, France

    Samuel Lévy (MD)

Authors
  1. Samuel Lévy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Lévy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lévy, S. Internal Defibrillation: Where we Have Been and Where we Should be Going?. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 13 (Suppl 1), 61–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-005-1824-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-005-1824-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation