Skip to main content
Log in

Object Preposing in Classical and Pre-Medieval Chinese

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, one of the three instances of object preposing in Classical Chinese, the structure [NP1 NP2 shi / zhi V], is discussed in detail. According to their distributional differences, two structures—A [NP1 NP2 shi V] and B [NP1 NP2 zhi V]—are distinguished, and it is shown that both constructions, although sometimes identical in the surface structure, are subject to different syntactic and semantic constraints. This analysis challenges the hypothesis proposed by Peyraube (Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientales 26(1):3–20, 1997) that structure A [NP1 NP2 shi V] was gradually replaced by structure B [NP1 NP2 zhi V] during the Warring States period. In accordance with the syntactic constraints, different analyses are proposed for structures A and B in the course of the paper. Structure A, [NPS NPO shi V], is analyzed as a copula construction, a focalization (cleft) construction with the object not in preverbal position but to the right of the copula. Structure B, which is more heterogeneous than structure A, will be subdivided into different structures, only two of which will be retained as cases of a focalized and preposed object. The analysis reveals that object preposing in Classical Chinese is evidently a case of marked word order and cannot be assumed to be a vestige of an earlier SOV word order in Chinese.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge, Edith. 2006. VP-internal quantification in old Chinese. In Chinese linguistics in Budapest, ed. R. Djamouri and R. Sybesma, 1–15. Paris: CRLAO.

  • Ao, Jinghao敖 鏡 浩. 1983. Lüelun xian Qin shiqi ‘O/shi/V’ jushi de yanbian 略 論 先 秦 時 期 ’O /是 /V 句 式 的 演 變. Zhongguo yuwen 5: 355–359.

  • Ding, Zhenqu 丁 貞 蕖. 1983. Lun qian zhi binyu hou de ‘shi’ ‘zhi’ de cixing 論 前 置 賓 語 後 的 ‘是’ ‘之’ 的 詞 性. Zhongguo yuwen 2: 120–125.

  • Djamouri, Redouane. 1999. The evolution of ZHI 之 in Archaic Chinese. In In honor of Mei Tsu-Lin: Studies on Chinese historical syntax and morphology, ed. Alain Peyraube and Chaofen Sun, 33–48. Paris: f cole des Hautes ftudes en Sciences Sociales.

  • Djamouri, Redouane. 2001a. Système des pronoms démonstratifs en chinois bas archaïque. In Collected essays in Ancient Chinese grammar, ed. Redouane Djamouri, 161–176. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.

  • Djamouri, Redouane. 2001b. Markers of predication in shang bone inscriptions. In Sinitic grammar, ed. Hilary Chappell, 143–171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gassmann Robert. (1997) Grundstrukturen der antikchinesischen syntax. Eine erklärende grammatik. Peter Lang, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of grammar, ed. Joseph H. Greenberg, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Gudai Hanyu xuci cidian 古 代 漢 語 虛 詞 詞 典. 1999, 2000. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.

  • Hagège Claude. (1975) Le Problème Linguistique des Prépositions et a Solution Chinoise. Sociéé de Linguistique de Paris, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Leshi 何 樂 士. 1982. Lun ‘wei zhi . . . ’ ju yu ‘ . . . zhi wei’ ju 論 ‘謂 之 . . . ’ 句 與 ‘ . . . 之 謂’ 句. Gu Hanyu yanjiu lunwen ji, 103–129.

  • He, Leshi 何 樂 士et al. 1985. Gudai Hanyu xuci tongshi 古 代 漢 語 虛 詞 通 釋. Beijing: Beijing chubanshe.

  • Hou, John Yien-Yao. 1979. Grammatical relations in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

  • Lau, D. C. 1984, 2003. Mencius: A bilingual edition. (trans. Lau, D.C. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

  • Li C.-N., Thompson S.-A. (1974) An explanation of word order change: SVO > SOV. Foundations of Language 12: 201–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisterernst, Barbara. 2000. Sprachwandel vom klassischen zum hanzeitlichen Chinesisch. In Münsterische Sinologische Mitteilungen, Beiträge zur Geschichte und Kultur des Alten China. ed. Ulrich Unger and Hans Stumpfeldt. Bad Honnef: Bock + Herchen.

  • Mullie, Jos. L. M. 1947–1948. Grondbeginselen van de Chinese letterkundige taal. Leuven: Devallens.

  • Paris Marie-Claude. (1979) Some aspects of the syntax and semantics of the lian . . . ye/dou construction in Mandarin. Cahiers de linguistique Asie Orientale 23(1/2): 241–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul Waltraud. (2002) Sentence-internal topics in Mandarin Chinese: The case of object preposing. Language and Linguistics 3(4): 695–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul Waltraud. (2005) Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 33: 111–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul Waltraud, John Whitman. (2008) Shi . . . de focus clefts in Mandarin Chinese. The Linguistic Review 25(3/4): 413–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyraube Alain. (1997) On word order in Archaic Chinese. Cahiers de linguistique Asie Orientale 26(1): 3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyraube, Alain, and Thekla Wiebusch. 1994. Problems relating to the history of different copulas in Ancient Chinese. In In honour of William S. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, ed. Matthew Y. Chen and Ovid J. L.Tzeng, 383–404. Taipei: Pyramide Press.

  • Pulleyblank Edwin G. (1960) Studies in early Chinese grammar, Part I. Asia Major 8: 36–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulleyblank Edwin G. (1995) An outline of Classical Chinese grammar. UBC Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht et alibi: Kluwer.

  • Shengli Feng. (1996) Prosodically constrained syntactic changes in early archaic chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 323–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyu, Shu-ing. 1995. The syntax of focus and topic. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

  • Shyu Shu-ing. (2001) Remarks on object movement in Mandarin SOV order. Language and Linguistics 2(1): 3–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Takashima Ken’ichi. 1996. Morphology of the negatives. In Studies in early Chinese civilization, ed. M. Ito, and Ken’ichi Takashima. Osaka: Kansai Gaidai University Publications.

  • Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X-bar theory. PhD dissertaion, Cornell University.

  • Thesaurus Linguae Seriacae (TLS). http://tls3.uni-hd.de/Lasso/TLS/default.html. Accessed November 2009.

  • Tseng Chiu-yu 鄭 秋 豫 ed., 1997. Zhongguo jingnei yuyan ji yuyan xue 中 國 境 內 語 言 慎 語 言 慎 (Chinese languages and linguistics IV: Typological studies of languages in China). Taipei: Academia Sinica.

  • Unger, Ulrich. 1987. Grammatik des Klassischen Chinesisch, vols. II and III (unpublished).

  • Wang, Li 王 力. 1957–1958, 1980. Hanyu shikao 漢 語 史 犒. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

  • Yin, Guoguang 殷 國 光. 1985. Xian Qin hanyu dai yufa biaozhi de binyu qien zhi jushi chutan 先 秦 漢 語 帶 語 法 標 志 的 賓 語 前 置 句 式 初 探. Yuyan Yanjiu 2: 162–171.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Meisterernst.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meisterernst, B. Object Preposing in Classical and Pre-Medieval Chinese. J East Asian Linguist 19, 75–102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-010-9056-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-010-9056-x

Keywords

Navigation