Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Material Matters: Representation and Materiality of the Harappan Body

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the Indus Civilization (ca. 2600–1900 BC), a society with no readable texts and few larger-scale representations, terracotta figurines were the most common representations of the human body. This paper explores the unique construction of the material representations of bodies and other material culture from Harappa, a major Indus site now in Pakistan. Hand-modeling representations of human bodies from dual clay pieces, sometimes decorated with bone pigments, suggests a focus on the process and ideological rather than practical choices in the materialization of the Harappan human body. For the Harappans, material matters as they engage physically with their world and embody themselves and their worldview.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, N. P. (2000). Early Indian moulded terracotta: The emergence of an iconography and variations in style, circa second century BC to first century AD. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, London.

  • Amiran, R. (1962). Myths of the creation of man and the Jericho statues. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 167, 23–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 3–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attfield, J. (2000). Wild things: The material culture of everyday life. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. W. (2005). Prehistoric figurines: Representation and corporeality in the neolithic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélemy de Saizieu, B., & Bouquillon, A. (1997). Evolution of glazed materials from the chalcolithic to the Indus period based on the data of Mehrgarh and Nausharo. In R. Allchin & B. Allchin (Eds.), South Asian archaeology 1995 (pp. 63–76). New Delhi: Oxford & IBH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhan, K. K., Vidale, M., & Kenoyer, J. M. (1994). Harappan technology: Methodological and theoretical issues. Man and Environment, 19(1–2), 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhan, K. K., Vidale, M., & Kenoyer, J. M. (2002). Some important aspects of the Harappan civilization technological tradition. In S. Settar & R. Korisettar (Eds.), Indian archaeology in retrospect, volume II. Protohistory: Archaeology of the Harappan civilization (pp. 223–271). New Delhi: Manohar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl, P. F. (1996). Symbolic communication systems: symbols on anthropomorphic figurines in neolithic and chalcolithic Southeast Europe. Journal of European Archaeology, 4, 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl, P. F. (2003). Figurines in action: Methods and theories in figurine research. In R. Layton, S. Shennan & P. Stone (Eds.), A future for archaeology: The past as the present (pp. 199–215). London: UCL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouquillon, A., Barthélemy de Saizieu, B., & Duval, A. (1995). Glazed steatite beads from Mehrgarh and Nausharo (Indus Valley). In J. R. Druzik & P. B. Vandiver (Eds.), Materials issues in art and archaeology IV, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 352 (pp. 527–538). Pittsburgh: Materials Research Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.-C. (1986). The archaeology of ancient China. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. (2000). Fragmentation in archaeology: People, places and broken objects in the prehistory of southeastern Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J., & Gaydarska, B. (2007). Parts and wholes: Fragmentation in prehistoric context. Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. R. (2003). Representing the Indus body: Sex, gender, sexuality, and the anthropomorphic terracotta figurines from Harappa. Asian Perspectives, 42(2), 304–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. R. (2005). In search of the elusive “mother goddess”: A critical approach to the interpretation of Indus terracotta figurines with a focus on Harappa. In C. Jarrige & V. Lefevre (Eds.), South Asian archaeology 2001 (pp. 61–77). Paris: Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations-ADPF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. R. (2007a). The social lives of figurines: Recontextualizing the third millennium BC terracotta figurines from Harappa (Pakistan). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge.

  • Clark, S. R. (2007b). Bodies of evidence: The case against the “Harappan” mother goddess. In C. Renfrew & I. Morley (Eds.), Image and imagination: A global prehistory of figurative representation (pp. 227–239). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. R. (in press). The social lives of figurines: Recontextualizing the third millennium BC terracotta figurines from Harappa (Pakistan). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

  • Coomaraswamy, A. K. (1928). Archaic Indian Terracottas. IPEK: Jahrbuch für Prähistorische and Ethnographische Kunst (Annual Review of Prehistoric and Ethnographical Art), 1928, 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, G. F. (1960). Mesopotamian and Related Female Figurines: Their Chronology, Diffusion, and Cultural Functions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. University Microfilms: Ann Arbor.

  • Dales, G. F. (1991a). Some specialized ceramic studies at Harappa. In R. H. Meadow (Ed.), Harappa excavations 1986–1990: A multidisciplinary approach to third millennium urbanism. Monographs in world archaeology, no. 3 (pp. 61–69). Madison: Prehistory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, G. F. (1991b). The phenomenon of the Indus civilization. In M. Jansen, M. Mulloy & G. Urban (Eds.), Forgotten cities on the Indus: Early civilization in Pakistan from the 8th to the 2nd millennium B.C. (pp. 129–144). Mainz: von Zabern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, G. F., Kenoyer, J. M., & the staff of the Harappa Project. (1991). Summaries of five seasons of research at Harappa (District Sahiwal, Punjab, Pakistan), 1986–1990. In R. H. Meadow (Ed.), Harappa excavations 1986–1990: A multidisciplinary approach to third millennium urbanism. Monographs in world archaeology, no. 3 (pp. 185–262). Madison: Prehistory.

    Google Scholar 

  • During Caspers, E. C. L. (1985). Sundry technical aspects of the manufacture of Indus valley terracotta art. In G. Gnoli (Ed.), Miscellanea of studies in memory of Guiseppe Tucci (pp. 267–285). Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairservis, W. A., Jr. (1967). The origin, character, and decline of an early civilization. American Museum Novitates, 2302, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, S., Sproat, R., & Witzel, M. (2004). The collapse of the Indus-script thesis: the myth of a literate Harappan civilization. Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. P. (1996). The Indus–Saraswati civilization: Origins, problems, and issues. Delhi: Pratibha Prakashan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourmouziadis, G. (1973). I anthropomorphi eidoloplastiki tis neolithikis thessalias: Provlimata kataskevis, typologias kai ermineias. Volos: Society of Thessalian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyler, S. P. (1996). Gifts of earth: Terracottas and clay sculptures of India. Middletown: Grantha Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2007). Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrige, C. (1991). The Terracotta figurines from Mehrgarh. In M. Jansen, M. Mulloy & G. Urban (Eds.), Forgotten cities on the Indus: Early civilization in Pakistan from the 8th to the 2nd millennium B.C (pp. 87–93). Mainz: von Zabern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. A. (2007). Figurines, meaning and meaning-making in early Mesoamerica. In C. Renfrew & I. Morley (Eds.), Image and imagination: A global prehistory of figurative representation (pp. 101–110). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenoyer, J. M. (1991). Ornament styles of the Indus valley tradition: evidence from recent excavations at Harappa, Pakistan. Paléorient, 17(2), 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenoyer, J. M. (1994a). The Harappan state: Was it or wasn’t it? In J. M. Kenoyer (Ed.), From sumer to Meluhha: Contributions to the archaeology of South and West Asia in memory of George F. Dales, Jr. Wisconsin archaeological reports, volume 3 (pp. 71–80). Madison: Prehistory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenoyer, J. M. (1994b). Experimental studies of Indus valley technology at Harappa. In A. Parpola & P. Koskikallio (Eds.), South Asian archaeology 1993, volume II. Annales academiae scientiarum fennicae B-271 (pp. 345–362). Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenoyer, J. M. (1998). Ancient cities of the Indus civilization. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenoyer, J. M., & Meadow, R. H. (2000). The Ravi phase: A new cultural manifestation at Harappa. In M. Taddei & G. de Marco (Eds.), South Asian archaeology 1997 (pp. 55–76). Rome: Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenoyer, J. M., Vidale, M., & Bhan, K. K. (1994). Carnelian bead production in Khambhat, India: An ethnoarchaeological study. In B. Allchin (Ed.), Living traditions: Studies in the ethnoarchaeology of South Asia (pp. 281–306). New Delhi: Oxford and IBH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, A. B., & Meskell, L. (1997). Bodies of evidence in prehistoric Cyprus. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 7(2), 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (1996). Beyond the Tigris and Euphrates: Bronze age civilizations. Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (1999). The Indus civilization: the case for caste formation. Journal of East Asian Archaeology, 13(1), 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, E. J. H. (1938). Further excavations at Mohenjo-Daro: Being an official account of archaeological excavations at Mohenjo-Daro carried out by the government of India between the years 1927 and 1931, volumes I–II. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, S. C. (1968). Indian civilization: The formative period (a study of archaeology as anthropology). Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. H. (ed). (1931). Mohenjo-daro and the Indus civilization, volumes I–III, A. London: Probsthain.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B., & Vandiver, P. (1991). Ancient high-strength ceramics: Fritted faience bracelet manufacture at Harappa (Pakistan), ca. 2300–1800 B. C. In P. Vandiver, J. Druzik & G. W. Wheeler (Eds.), Materials issues in art and archaeology, volume II. Materials research society symposium proceedings 185 (pp. 495–510). Pittsburgh: Materials Research Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, R. H. (1991). Harappa excavations 1986–1990: A multidisciplinary approach to third millennium urbanism. Monographs in world archaeology, no. 3. Madison: Prehistory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, R. H. (2002). The chronological and cultural significance of a steatite wig from Harappa. Iranica Antiqua, 37, 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, R. H., & Kenoyer, J. M. (1997). Excavations at Harappa 1994–1995: New perspectives on the Indus script, craft activities, and city organization. In R. Allchin & B. Allchin (Eds.), South Asian archaeology 1995 (pp. 139–172). New Delhi: Oxford and IBH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, R. H., & Kenoyer, J. M. (2000). The ‘tiny steatite seals’ (incised steatite tablets) of Harappa: Some observations on their context and dating. In M. Taddei & G. de Marco (Eds.), South Asian archaeology 1997 (pp. 321–340). Rome: Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, R. H., & Kenoyer, J. M. (2001). Recent discoveries and highlights from excavations at Harappa: 1998–2000. Indian Archaeological Studies, 22, 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, R. H., Kenoyer, J. M., & Wright, R. P. (1994). Harappa archaeological research project: 1994 excavations. Submitted to the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Pakistan, 30 August 1994.

  • Meadow, R. H., Kenoyer, J. M., & Wright, R. P. (1995). Harappa archaeological research project: 1995 excavations. Submitted to the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Pakistan, 15 September 1995.

  • Meadow, R. H., Kenoyer, J. M., & Wright, R. P. (1996). Harappa archaeological research project: 1996 excavations. Submitted to the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Pakistan, December 17, 1996.

  • Meadow, R. H., Kenoyer, J. M., & Wright, R. P. (1998). Harappa archaeological research project: 1997 excavations. Submitted to the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Pakistan.

  • Meadow, R. H., Kenoyer, J. M., & Wright, R. P. (1999). Harappa archaeological research project: 1998 excavations. Submitted to the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Pakistan.

  • Meadow, R. H., Kenoyer, J. M., & Wright, R. P. (2000). Harappa archaeological research project: 1999 excavations. Submitted to the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Pakistan.

  • Meadow, R. H., Kenoyer, J. M., & Wright, R. P. (2001). Harappa archaeological research project: Harappa excavations 2000 and 2001. Submitted to the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Pakistan.

  • Meskell, L. M. (1995). Goddesses, Gimbutas and “New Age” archaeology. Antiquity, 69, 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. M. (2004). Object worlds in ancient Egypt. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. M. (2007). Refiguring the corpus at Çatalhöyük. In C. Renfrew & I. Morley (Eds.), Image and imagination: A global prehistory of figurative representation (pp. 137–149). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. M., Nakamura, C., King, R., & Farid, S. (2008). Figured lifeworlds and depositional practices at Çatalhöyük. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(2), 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1985). Ideology and the Harappan civilization. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 4(1), 34–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1987). Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1998). Why some things matter. In D. Miller (Ed.), Material cultures: Why some things matter (pp. 3–21). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (ed). (2005). Materiality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. M.-L. (2006). Archaeological approaches to technology. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mughal, M. R. (1968). Harappa-1966 (Cemetery R37). Pakistan Archaeology, 5, 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, C. (2005). Mastering matters: Magical sense and apotropaic figurine worlds of Neo-Assyria. In L. Meskell (Ed.), Archaeologies of materiality (pp. 18–45). Malden: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nanoglou, S. (2005). Subjectivity and material culture in Thessaly, Greece: the case of Neolithic anthropomorphic imagery. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 15(2), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanoglou, S. (2008a). Representation of humans and animals in Greece and the Balkans during the earlier Neolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanoglou, S. (2008b). Qualities of humanness: Material aspects of Greek Neolithic anthropomorphic imagery. Journal of Material Culture, 13(3), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty, W. D. (1980). Women, androgynes, and other mythical beasts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parpola, A. (1994). Deciphering the Indus script. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possehl, G. L. (1996). The Indus age: The writing system. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possehl, G. L. (1998). Sociocultural complexity without the state: The Indus civilization. In G. M. Feinman & J. Marcus (Eds.), Archaic states (pp. 261–291). Santa Fe: School of American Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possehl, G. L. (1999). Indus age: The beginnings. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, V., & Matarasso, P. (1999). Crafts and the evolution of complex societies: New methodologies for modelling the organization of production, a Harappan example. In M.-A. Dobres & C. Hoffman (Eds.), The social dynamics of technology, practice, politics and world views (pp. 46–70). Washington: Smithsonian Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1999). The material life of human beings: Artifacts, behavior, and communication. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1987). Theory and experiment in the study of technological change. Current Anthropology, 28, 595–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M., & Schiffer, M. B. (2008). People and things: A behavioral approach to material culture. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. K. (1996). Terracotta art in northern India. Delhi: Parimal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Süger, H., Castenfeldt, S., & Fentz, M. (1991). Small functional items and regeneration of society: Dough figurines from the Kalash people of Chitral, Northern Pakistan. Folk, 33, 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talalay, L. E. (1987). Rethinking the function of clay figurine legs from Neolithic Greece: an argument by analogy. American Journal of Archaeology, 91, 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talalay, L. E. (1993). Deities, dolls, and devices: Neolithic figurines from Franchthi cave, Greece. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucko, P. J. (1968). Anthropomorphic figurines of predynastic Egypt and Neolithic Crete with comparative material from the prehistoric Near East and mainland Greece, Royal Anthropological Institute Occasional Paper No. 24, Andrew Szmidla, Lo.

  • Vats, M. S. (1940). Excavations at Harappa, volumes I–II. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidale, M. (2000). The archaeology of Indus crafts: Indus craftspeople and why we study them. Rome: Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente (IsIAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, M. M. (1983). Hajji Firuz Tepe, Iran: The Neolithic settlement, Hasanlu excavation reports, volume I. University museum monograph 50. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, R. E. M. (1947). Harappa 1946: The defenses and Cemetery R37. Ancient India, 3, 59–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the editors of this special edition, Lynn Meskell and Stratos Nanoglou, for inviting me to contribute and for numerous constructive suggestions on earlier drafts that helped focus the central arguments and give the paper the appropriate structure. The paper also benefited greatly from the constructive comments of Jim Skibo, Catherine Cameron, Heather Miller, and anonymous reviewers. Although this paper draws upon research presented in my dissertation, the paper allowed me to think about these data in a new way. I would like to thank my doctoral advisors C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky and Richard Meadow for their ongoing support and for reading portions of the work presented here. I’m also grateful to Steve Weiner for generously providing additional analyses of the pigment samples. This research was made possible through the generous cooperation of the Department of Archaeology and Museums of the Government of Pakistan, including the Harappa Museum and the National Museum of Pakistan, the Harappa Archaeological Research Project, the Lahore Museum, the University of Peshawar SSAQ Museum of Archaeology, the Archaeological Survey of India, and the National Museum of India. The American School of Prehistoric Research, the George F. Dales Foundation, the Harappa Archaeological Research Project, the Cora DuBois Charitable Trust, and Harvard University provided financial support for my research. Any errors are solely the responsibility of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA

    Sharri R. Clark

Authors
  1. Sharri R. Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharri R. Clark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, S.R. Material Matters: Representation and Materiality of the Harappan Body. J Archaeol Method Theory 16, 231–261 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-009-9068-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-009-9068-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation