Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Errors and uncertainty in bioassessment methods – major results and conclusions from the STAR project and their application using STARBUGS

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The STAR project’s extensive replicated sampling programmes have provided the first ever quantitative comparative studies of the susceptibility of a wide range of national macroinvertebrate sampling methods and taxonomic metrics to uncertainty resulting from the effects of field sampling variability and subsequent sub-sampling and laboratory (or bank-side) procedures and protocols. We summarise six STAR project papers examining various aspects of the potential sources of uncertainty in the observed fauna and observed metric values. The use of new simulation software STARBUGS (STAR Bioassessment Uncertainty Software System) to incorporate the effects of these potential errors into quantitative assessments of the uncertainty in assigning water bodies to WFD ecological status classes is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Buffagni S. Erba M. Cazzola J. Murray-Bligh H. Soszka P. Genoni (2006) ArticleTitleThe STAR common metrics approach to the WFD intercalibration process: Full application for small, lowland rivers in three European countries Hydrobiologia 566 379–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. T., 2004. 9th STAR Deliverable. Error/Uncertainty Module Software STARBUGS (STAR Bio Assessment Uncertainty Guidance Software) User Manual. www.eu-star.at

  • R. T. Clarke M. T. Furse J. F. Wright D. Moss (1996) ArticleTitleDerivation of a biological quality index for river sites: comparison of the observed with the expected fauna Journal of Applied Statistics 23 311–332 Occurrence Handle10.1080/02664769624279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Clarke M. T. Furse R. J. M. Gunn J. M. Winder J. F. Wright (2002) ArticleTitleSampling variation in macroinvertebrate data and implications for river quality indices Freshwater Biology 47 1735–1751 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00885.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Clarke J. F. Wright M. T. Furse (2003) ArticleTitleRIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers Ecological Modelling 160 219–233 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00255-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Clarke J. Davy-Bowker L. Sandin N. Friberg R. K. Johnson B. Bis (2006a) ArticleTitleEstimates and comparisons of the effects of sampling variation using ‘national’ macroinvertebrate sampling protocols on the precision of metrics used to assess ecological status Hydrobiologia 566 477–503

    Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Clarke A. Lorenz L. Sandin A. Schmidt-Kloiber J. Strackbein N. T. Kneebone P. Haase (2006b) ArticleTitleEffects of sampling and sub-sampling variation using the STAR-AQEM sampling protocol on the precision of macroinvertebrate metrics Hydrobiologia 566 441–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Dines, R. A. & J. A. D. Murray-Bligh, 2000. In J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and Similar Techniques, Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, pp. 71–78

  • European Union, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC. Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. European Commission PE-CONS 3639/1/100 Rev 1, Luxemburg

  • Furse, M., D. Hering, O. Moog, P. Verdonschot, R. K. Johnson, K. Brabec, K. Gritzalis, A. Buffagni, P. Pinto, N. Friberg, J. Murray-Bligh, J. Kokes, R. Alber, P. Usseglio-Polatera, P. Haase, R. Sweeting, B. Bis, K. Szoszkiewicz, H. Soszka, G. Springe, F. Sporka & I. Krno, 2006. The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia 566: 3–29

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Haase J. Murray-Bligh S. Lohse S. Pauls A. Sundermann R. Gunn R. Clarke (2006) ArticleTitleAssessing the impact of errors in sorting and identifying macroinvertebrate samples Hydrobiologia 566 505–521

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Lorenz R. T. Clarke (2006) ArticleTitleSample coherence – a field study approach to assess similarity of macroinvertebrate samples Hydrobiologia 566 461–476

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Šporka H. E. Vlek E. Bulánková I. Krno (2006) ArticleTitleInfluence of seasonal variation on bioassessment of streams using macroinvertebrates Hydrobiologia 566 543–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, H. E., 2004. Comparison of cost effectiveness between various macroinvertebrate field and laboratory protocols. European Commission, STAR (Standardisation of river classifications), Deliverable, N1, 78 pp, www.eu-star.at

  • H. E. Vlek F. Šporka I. Krno (2006) ArticleTitleInfluence of macroinvertebrate sample size on bioassessment of streams Hydrobiologia 566 523–542

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Winfrith Technology Centre, Winfrith Newburgh, DT2 8ZD, Dorchester, Dorset, UK

    Ralph T. Clarke

  2. Department of Hydrobiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45117, Essen, Germany

    Daniel Hering

Authors
  1. Ralph T. Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Hering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph T. Clarke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clarke, R.T., Hering, D. Errors and uncertainty in bioassessment methods – major results and conclusions from the STAR project and their application using STARBUGS. Hydrobiologia 566, 433–439 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0079-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0079-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation