Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Inconvenient Truth: the scientific argument

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The movie An Inconvenient Truth is a powerful portrayal of global warming and its impacts. The main scientific argument presented in the movie is for the most part consistent with the weight of scientific evidence, but with some of the main points needing updating, correction, or qualification. The detailed argument relies almost entirely on past and current evidence and neglects almost all information that can be gained from computer models, perhaps because such information would be difficult for a lay audience to grasp, believe, or connect with emotionally. This places an undue weight on current events as signs of ongoing climate change: some such events are apparently not related at all to climate change, while for other specific events the role of global warming is difficult or impossible to establish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Geophysical Union (2008). Human impacts on climate. EOS, 89, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Meteorological Society (2007). Climate change: An informational statement of the American Meteorological Society. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 88, 418–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, L., Bender, L., & Burns, S. Z. (2006). An Inconvenient truth. Paramount Classics DVD (American release).

  • Epstein, P. R., & McCarthy, J. J. (2005). Reply. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 86, 1483–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, E. B., Komar, N., Nasci, R. S., Montgomery, S. P., O’Leary, D. R., & Campbell, G. L. (2005). Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of West Nile Virus Disease. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 11, 1167–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007). Summary for policy makers. In Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K. B., Tignor M., & Miller H. L. (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, P., Ren, J., Alley, R. B., Allison, I., Carrasco, J., Flato, G., Fujii, Y., Kaser, G., Mote, P., Thomas, R. H., & Zhang, T. (2007). Observations: Changes in snow, ice, frozen ground. In Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K. B., Tignor M., & Miller H. L. (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, G. A., Stocker, T. F., Collins, W. D., Friedlingstein, P., Gaye, A. T., Gregory, J. M., Kitoh, A., Knutti, R., Murphy, J. M., Noda, A., Raper, S. C. B., Watterson, I. G., Weaver, A. J., & Zhao, Z. -C. (2007). Global climate projections. In Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K. B., Tignor M., & Miller H. L. (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2006). Surface temperature reconstructions for the last 2,000 years. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, doi:10.1126/science.1103618

  • Pielke, R. A., Agrawala, S., Bouwer, L. M., Burton, I., Changnon, S., Glantz, M. H., Hooke, W. H., Klein, R. J. T., Kunkel, K., Mileti, D., Sarewitz, D., Thompkins, E. L., Stehr, N., & von Storch, H. (2005). Clarifying the attribution of recent disaster losses: A response to Epstein and McCarthy. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 86, 1481–1483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth, K. E., Jones, P. D., Ambenje, P., Bojariu, R., Easterling, D., Klein Tank, A., Parker, D., Rahimzadeh, F., Renwick, J. A., Rusticucci, M., Soden, B., & Zhai, P. (2007). Observations: Surface and atmospheric climate change. In Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K. B., Tignor M., & Miller H. L. (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heerden, I., & Bryan, M. (2006). The storm: What went wrong and why during Hurricane Katrina – the inside story from one Louisiana scientist. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, P. J., Holland, G. J., Curry, J. A., & Chang, H.-R. (2005). Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science, 309, 1844–1846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. Nielsen-Gammon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen-Gammon, J.W. An Inconvenient Truth: the scientific argument. GeoJournal 70, 21–26 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9126-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9126-z

Keywords

Navigation