Abstract
Hans Ruin and Patrick Heelan join me in celebrating the rise of post-positivist and phenomenological approaches to scientific and technological practice. Yet as they both know, I am also concerned that the very presence of all the new accounts which give voice to this trend may tempt us into concluding prematurely that the traditional understanding of science and technology has already been displaced. With especially Ruin’s encouragement, I expand my original discussion of this concern by explaining why I agree with him about the ontologically mistaken suppositions that one might become post-positivistic by doing philosophy “meta-philosophically,” or become phenomenological by making “life” more basic that “nature.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goeminne G. (2011) Postphenomenology and the politics of sustainable technology. Foundations of Science 16(2–3): 173–194
Heelan, P. (2011). Phenomenology, Ontology, and Quantum Physics. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9247-6.
Ruin, H. (2011). Thinking through the prism of life. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9248-5.
Scharff, R. (2011). “Who” is a “topical measuring” postphenomenologist and how does one get that way? Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9251-x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scharff, R.C. Being Post-Positivist . . . or Just Talking About it?. Found Sci 18, 393–397 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9249-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9249-4