Abstract
We examine how foreign and domestic portfolio investors, both classified into money managers, invest in Japanese firms over the sample period of 1985–1998. We propose the agency-familiarity hypothesis to explain investment behavior of these institutional investors focusing on the two firm-level variables: market capitalization and export ratios. Both types of institutional investors over-invest in familiar firms measured in firm size while each shows opposite preference patterns with respect to the export ratios. The foreign investors become more export-firm oriented in the second-half sample and the domestic orientation of the domestic institutional investors becomes statistically significant during the same second-half. Because of the location difference of their client investors, the compositions of familiar firms are different between these two types with respect to the firm’s export activities. Home bias at the firm level in terms of the sensitivity to the export ratio is evident for both types of investors, especially, in more recent years, although equity home bias at the country level has been gradually mitigated. Based on these macro- and micro-level results, we conclude that the investment behavior of money managers is more consistent with the agency-familiarity explanation than the information-based explanation regardless of their nationalities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahearne, A. G., Griever, W. L., and Warnock, F. E. (2001) Information costs and home bias: An analysis of U.S. holdings of foreign equities, International Discussion Papers No. 691, Board of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC.
Bakaert, G. and Urias, M. S. (1996) Diversification, integration and emerging market closed-end funds, J. Finance 51, 835–869.
Brennan, M. and Cao, H. (1997) International portfolio investment flows, J. Finance 52, 1851–1880.
Chan, K., Covrig, V., and Ng, L. (2003) What determines the domestic bias and foreign bias? Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Cooper, I. and Kaplanis, E. (1994) Home bias in equity portfolio, inflation hedging, and international capital equilibrium, Rev. Financ. Stud. 7, 45–60.
Dahlquist, M. and Robertson, G. (2001) Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics, J. Financ. Econ. 59, 413–440.
Dahlquist, M., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. M., and Williamson, R. (2003) Corporate governance and the home bias, J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 38, 87–110.
Del Guercio, D. (1996) The distorting effect the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investments, J. Financ. Econ. 40, 31–62.
Errunza, V., Hogan, K., and Hung, M.-W. (1999) Can the gains from international diversification be achieved without trading abroad? J. Finance 54, 2075–2107.
Falkenstein, E. (1996) Preferences for stock characteristics as revealed by mutual fund portfolio holdings, J. Finance 51, 111–136.
Glassman, D. A. and Riddick, L. A. (2001) What causes home bias and how should it be measured? J. Empirical Finance 8, 35–54.
Gompers, P. A. and Metrick, A. (2001) Institutional investors and equity prices, Quart. J. Econ. 116, 229–259.
Hamao, Y. and Mei, J. (2001) Living with the “enemy“: An analysis of foreign investment in the Japanese equity market, J. Int. Money Finance 20, 715–735.
Heath, C. and Tversky, A. (1991) Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty, J. Risk Uncertainty 4, 5–28.
Hiraki, T., Inoue, H., Ito, A., Kuroki, F., and Masuda, H. (2003) Home biases in Japan: Another pathology of the Japanese keiretsu, Working paper at International University of Japan.
Huberman, G. (2001) Familiarity breeds investment, Rev. Financ. Stud. 14, 659–680.
Kang, J.-K. and Stulz, R. (1997) Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan, J. Financ. Econ. 46, 3–28.
Karolyi, G. A. (2002) Did the Asian financial crisis scare foreign investors out of Japan? Pacific-Basin Finance J. 10, 411–442.
Lewis, K. K. (1995) Puzzles in international finance markets. In G. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds), Handbook of International Economics, vol. III, Elsevier Science B.V. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1913–1971.
Lewis, K. K. (1999) Trying to explain home bias in equities and consumption, J. Econ. Lit. 37, 571–608.
Li, K. (2001) Confidence in the Familiar: An international perspective, Working paper at the University of British Columbia.
Pinkowitz, L. and Williamson, R. (2001) Bank power and cash holdings: Evidence from Japan, Rev. Financ. Stud. 14, 1059–1082.
Pastaor, L. (2000) Portfolio selection and asset pricing models, J. Finance 55, 179–223.
Stockman, A. C. and Dellas, H. (1989) International portfolio nondiversification and exchange rate variability, J. Int. Econ. 26, 271–289.
Tesar, L. and Werner, I. (1995) Home bias and high turnover, J. Int. Monet. Finance 14, 467–492.
Weinstein, D. E. and Yafeh, Y. (1998) On the costs of a bank centered financial system: Evidence from the changing main bank relations in Japan, J. Finance 53, 635–672.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hiraki, T., Ito, A. & Kuroki, F. Investor Familiarity and Home Bias: Japanese Evidence. Asia-Pacific Finan Markets 10, 281–300 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-005-4227-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-005-4227-x