Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of the G-matrix in life history traits in the common frog during a recent colonisation of an island system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of genetic correlations between traits that ostensibly channel the path of evolution away from the direction of natural selection require information on key aspects such as ancestral phenotypes, the duration of adaptive evolution, the direction of natural selection, and genetic covariances. In this study we provide such information in a frog population system. We studied adaptation in life history traits to pool drying in frog populations on islands of known age, which have been colonized from a mainland population. The island populations show strong local adaptation in development time and size. We found that the first eigenvector of the variance–covariance matrix (g max) had changed between ancestral mainland populations and newly established island populations. Interestingly, there was no divergence in g max among island populations that differed in their local adaptation in development time and size. Thus, a major change in the genetic covariance of life-history traits occurred in the colonization of the island system, but subsequent local adaptation in development time took place despite the constraints imposed by the genetic covariance structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altwegg R, Reyer HU (2003) Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Evolution 57:872–882

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ, Phillips PC (1999) Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. II. Coastal-inland divergence in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 53:1516–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ, Burger R, Holenhole PA, Beverley CA, Jones AG (2008) Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. Evolution 62:2451–2461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ball SL, Baker RL (1996) Predator-induced life history changes: antipredatore behavior costs or facultative life history shifts? Ecology 77:1116–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bégin M, Roff DA (2003) The constancy of the G matrix through species divergence and the effects of quantitative genetic constraints on phenotypic evolution: a case study in crickets. Evolution 57:1107–1120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berner D, Adams DC, Grandchamp A-C, Hendry AP (2008) Natural selection drives patterns of lake –stream divergence in stickleback foraging morphology. J Evol Biol 21:1653–1665

    Google Scholar 

  • Berner D, Stutz WE, Bolnick DI (2010) Foarging trait (co)variances in stickleback evolve deterministically and do not predict trajectories of adaptive diversification. Evolution 64:2265–2277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berven KA (1990) Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (R. sylvatica). Ecology 71:1599–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blows MW, Higgie M (2003) Genetic constraints on the evolution of mate recognition under Natural Selection. Am Nat 161:240–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blows MW, Hoffmann AA (2005) A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86:1371–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cano JM, Laurila A, Palo J, Merilä J (2004) Population differentiation in G matrix structure due to natural selection in R. temporaria. Evolution 58:2013–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth SF, Rundle HD, Blows MW (2010) The contribution of selection and genetic constraints to phenotypic divergence. Am Nat 175:186–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doroszuk A, Wojewodzic MW, Gort G, Kammenga JE (2008) Rapid divergence of genetic variance-covariance matrix within a natural population. Am Nat 171:291–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elmberg J (1991a) Factors affecting male yearly mating success in the common frog, R. temporaria. Beh Ecol Sociobiol 28:125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmberg J (1991b) Ovarian cyclicity and fecundity in boreal common frogs R. temporaria L. along a climatic gradient. Funct Ecol 5:340–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eroukhmanoff F (2009) Just how much is the G-matrix actually constraining adaptation? Evol Biol 36:323–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eroukhmanoff F, Svensson EI (2008) Phenotypic integration and conserved covariance structure in calopterygid damselflies. J Evol Biol 21:514–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eroukhmanoff F, Svensson EI (2011) Evolution and stability of the G-matrix during colonization of a novel envirnonment. J Evol Biol 24:1363–1373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eroukhmanoff F, Outomuro D, Ochoran FJ, Svensson EI (2009) Patterns of phenotypic divergence in wing covariance structure of calopterygid damselflies. Evol Biol 36:214–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasc J et al (1997) Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Europe, Societas Europea Herpetologica & Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris

  • Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Heredity 86:485–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC Methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen TF, Houle D (2008) Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraints in multivariate characters. J Evol Biol 21:1201–1219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hine E, Chenoweth S, Rundle HD, Blows MW (2009) Characterizing the evolution of genetic covariance tensors. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:1567–1578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson F, Hjelm J, Giles BE (2005) Life history and morphology of R. temporaria in response to pool permanence. Evol Ecol Res 7:1025–1038

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones AG, Arnold SJ, Burger R (2003) Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleitropic mutation, stabilizing selection and genetic drift. Evolution 57:1747–1760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1979) Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain-body size allometry. Evolution 33:402–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurila A, Kujasalo J (1999) Habitat duration, predation risk and phenotypic plasticity in common frog (R. temporaria) tadpoles. J Anim Ecol 68:1123–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurila A, Seppä P (1998) Multiple paternity in the common frog (R. temporaria): genetic evidence from tadpole kin groups. Biol J Linn Soc 63:221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind MI (2009) Phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation in island populations of R. temporaria. PhD Thesis, Umeå University

  • Lind MI, Johansson F (2007) The degree of adaptive phenotypic plasticity is correlated with the spatial environmental heterogeneity experienced by island populations of R. temporaria. J Evol Biol 20:1288–1297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lind MI, Johansson F (2011) Testing the role of phenotypic plasticity for local adaptation: growth and development in time-constrained R. temporaria populations. J Evol Biol Online Early. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02393.x

  • Lind MI, Persbo F, Johansson F (2008) Pool desiccation and developmental thresholds in the common frog, R. temporaria. Proc R Soc B 275:1071–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind MI, Ingvarsson PK, Johansson H, Hall D, Johansson F (2011) Gene flow and selection on phenotypic plasticity in an island system. Evolution 65:684–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Marroig G, Cheverud JM (2005) Size as a line of least evolutionary resistance: diet and adaptive morphological radiation in new world monkeys. Evolution 59:1128–1142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuigan K (2006) Studying evolution using multivariate quantitative genetics. Mol Ecol 15:883–896

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGuigan K, Chenoweth SF, Blows MW (2005) Phenotypic divergence along lines of genetic variance. Am Nat 165:32–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merilä J, Björklund M (1999) Population divergence and morphometric integration in the greenfinch (Carduelis chloris)—evolution against the lines of least resistance. J Evol Biol 12:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merilä J, Sheldon BC (1999) Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 83:103–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC, Arnold SJ (1999) Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance–covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53:1506–1515

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M (2003) Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Ecol Lett 6:265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2006) CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News 6:7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff D (2002) Comparing G matrices: a MANOVA approach. Evolution 56:1286–1291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA, Mousseau T, Møller AP, deLope F, Saino N (2004) Geographic variation in the G matrices of wild populations of the barn swallow. Heredity 93:8–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe L, Ludwig D (1991) Size and timing of metamorphosis in complex life cycles: time constraints and variation. Ecology 72:413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D (1996) Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50:1766–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sgro CM, Blows MW (2004) The genetic covariance among clinal environments after adaptation to an environmental gradient in Drosophila serrate. Genetics 167:1281–1291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Steppan SJ, Phillips PC, Houle D (2002) Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol Evol 17:320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AJ et al (2009) An ecologist guide to the animal model. J Anim Ecol 79:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Almfelt for help with egg collection and laboratory experiments, and two anonymous reviewers for very constructive comments that improved this article. The Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Research Council FORMAS funded the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Johansson.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Genetic variance (V G ), covariance (rG [COV G ]) and heritability (h2) for life history traits in each population category

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johansson, F., Lind, M.I., Ingvarsson, P.K. et al. Evolution of the G-matrix in life history traits in the common frog during a recent colonisation of an island system. Evol Ecol 26, 863–878 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9542-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9542-2

Keywords

Navigation