Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex Differences in Perceived Weight-Based Employment Discrimination When Weight Discrimination is Illegal

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reported study explores sex differences in both overt and subtle forms of perceived weight discrimination in employment using original data from a telephone survey of 1,010 randomly selected residents of Michigan, the only U.S. state with a law prohibiting weight discrimination. Sex differences in the experience of overt forms of weight discrimination (e.g., refusing to hire a person) that have been consistently found in other work and non-work settings were not found in this unique legal context. However, overweight women reported experiencing subtle forms of weight discrimination (e.g., verbal harassment, exclusion from social activities) to a significantly greater extent than men. Implications for employers’ discharge of their responsibilities and for policy makers’ consideration of greater legal protection against weight discrimination are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, F. P., & Soltis, M. J. (2006). Preventive medicine: employee wellness programs are prone to legal maladies that require careful monitoring. HRMagazine, 51(1), 105–109.

  • Bellizzi, J. A., & Hasty, R. W. (2001). The effects of a stated organizational policy on inconsistent disciplinary action based on salesperson gender and weight. The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 21(3), 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, G., Tatum, D. S., & Ward-Cook, K. (2003). Correlates of professional withdrawal versus organizational withdrawal cognitions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D., & Friedman, M. A. (2005). Is obesity stigmatizing? Body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D., & Glauber, R. (2007). Gender, body mass, and socioeconomic status: new evidence from PSID. Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, 17, 253–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A Justification-suppression model of the expression of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2 (4th ed., pp. 504–553). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuijnck, G. (2009). Non-discrimination in human resources management as a moral Obligation. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dipboye, R. L., & Colella, A. (2005). The dilemmas of workplace discrimination. In R. L. Dipboye & A. Colella (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 452–462). Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., & Hebl, M. R. (2005). Discrimination at the level of the individual: Cognitive and affective factors. In R. L. Dipboye & A. Colella (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 11–35). Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensher, E. A., Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Donaldson, S. I. (2001). Effects of perceived discrimination on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, and grievances. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fikkan, J., & Rothblum, E. (2005). Weight bias in employment. In K. D. Brownell, R. M. Puhl, M. B. Schwartz, & L. Rudd (Eds.), Weight bias: Nature, consequences, and remedies (pp. 15–28). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fikkan, J. L., & Rothblum, E. D. (2012). Is fat a feminist issue? Exploring the gendered nature of weight bias. Sex Roles, 66, 575–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G. B., Collingsworth, L. L., Jobe, R. L., Bruan, K. D., & Wise, L. M. (2007). Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles, 56, 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank v. United Airlines, 216F.3d 485 (9th Cir. 2000).

  • Friedman, M. A., & Brownell, K. D. (1995). Psychological correlates of obesity: moving to the next generation of research. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatewood, R. D., & Carroll, A. B. (1991). Assessment of the ethical performance of organizational members. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 667–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdom v. Continental Airlines, Inc., 692F.2d. 602, 610, 30 FEP 235 (9th cir. 1982) (en banc), cert denied, 460 U.S. 1074 (1983).

  • Giacalone, R. A., & Promislo, M. D. (2010). Unethical and unwell: decrements in well-being and unethical activity at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, G. (2012). Workplace bullying in academia creates a negative work environment: an Italian study. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 24(4), 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, A. H., Sedo, S., Darity, W., & Hamilton, D. (2004). The Labor Supply consequences of perceptions of employer discrimination during search and on-the-job: integrating neoclassical theory and cognitive dissonance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. W. (2007). Women and weight-based employment discrimination. Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender, 13, 631–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E. (1998). The impact of male work environments and organizational policies on women’s experiences of sexual harassment. Gender and Society, 12(3), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, B. (2010). That’s about the size of it. Occupational Health, 62(7), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J. S., & Heywood, M. B. (1993). Do workers accurately perceive gender-wage discrimination? Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 47(1), 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, L. M., Naslund, E., & Rasmussen, F. (2010). Perceived discrimination among men and women with normal weight and obesity: a population-based study from Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(6), 587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. M., Lievens, F., & Van Hoye, G. (2004). “I Think that they discriminated against me”: using prototype theory and organizational justice theory for understanding perceived discrimination in selection and promotion situations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, E., & Lyons, C. (2010). Perceiving discrimination on the job: legal consciousness, workplace context, and the construction of race discrimination. Law and Society Review, 44(2), 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, K. (2005). A growing problem: why the federal government needs to shoulder the burden in protecting workers from weight discrimination. Catholic University Law Review, 54, 589–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (2011). When it comes to pay, do the thin win? The effect of weight on pay for men and women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R., Mickelson, K., & Williams, D. (1999). The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 208–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B. (2006). Report from SIOP: current industrial/organizational psychology perspectives of women in organizations. Equal Opportunities International, 26, 215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. B., & Ahmad, A. S. (2010). An experimental field study of interpersonal discrimination toward Muslim job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 63(4), 881–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B., Shapiro, J. R., Hebl, M. R., Singletary, S. L., & Turner, S. (2006). The stigma of obesity in customer service: a mechanism for remediation and bottom-line consequences of interpersonal discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 579–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B., Dunleavy, D. G., Dunleavy, E. M., Jaffer, S., Morgan, M. B., Elder, K., et al. (2011). Discrimination in the 21st century: are science and the law aligned?’. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(1), 54–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubilis, C. N. (2008). Weighting for protection in Massachusetts: the myth of equal opportunity in employment. Suffolk University Law Review, 42, 211–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, H., & Stotzer, R. L. (2011). Employment discrimination based on sexual orientation: a Hong Kong study. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeming, A., & Baruch, Y. (1998). The MBA as a bridge over the troubled waters of discrimination. Gender in Management, 13(3), 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovato, J. K., & Khoo, G. (1994). Social identity correlates of minority workers’ health. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Quinton, W., & McCoy, S. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 251–329.

  • Maranto, C. L., & Stenoien, A. F. (2000). Weight discrimination: a multidisciplinary analysis. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 12, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark v. National Communications Association, 72F. Supp. 2d 322 (S.D. N.Y. 1999).

  • Morris, S. (2006). Body mass index and occupational attainment. Journal of Health Economics, 25, 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, T. (2010). States carry weight of employment discrimination protection: resolving the growing problem of weight bias in the workplace. Western New England Law Review, 32, 173–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K. S., Puhl, R. M., Latner, J. D., Mir, A. S., & Hunter, J. A. (2010). Reducing anti-fat prejudice in preservice health students: a randomized trial. Obesity, 18(11), 2138–2144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ethnic identity moderates perceptions of prejudice: judgments of personal versus group discrimination and subtle versus blatant bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 550–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, E. A., & Smart Richman, L. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 533–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pool, R. (2001). Fat: Fighting the obesity epidemic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, K. D. (2001). Bas, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity Research, 9, 788–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhl, R. M., & Heuer, C. A. (2009). The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity, 17(5), 941–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhl, R. M., & Heuer, C. A. (2010). Obesity stigma: important considerations for public Health. American Journal of Public Health, 100(6), 1019–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puhl, R. M., Andreyeva, T., & Brownell, K. D. (2008). Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. International Journal of Obesity, 32(6), 992–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V. (1999). Weight-based discrimination in employment Psychological and legal aspects. Personnel Psychology, 52, 969–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V. (2002). Weight discrimination in the American workplace: ethical issues and analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V., Roehling, P. V., & Pichler, S. (2007). The relationship between body weight and weight-related perceived employment discrimination: the role of sex and race. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V., Roehling, P. V., & Odland, M. (2008). Investigating the validity of stereotypes about overweight employees: the relationship between body weight and normal personality traits. Group and Organization Management, 33, 392–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V., Pichler, S., & Bruce, T. (2013). Moderators of the effects of weight bias on job- related outcomes: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. R. (2000). The moral foundation of employee rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(4), 355–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, J. I., & Brock, P. (1996). Outcomes of perceived discrimination among Hispanic employees: is diversity management a luxury or a necessity? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 704–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartore, M. L., & Cunningham, G. B. (2007). Weight discrimination, hiring recommendations, person-job fit, and attributions: fitness-industry implications. Journal of Sport Management, 21, 172–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, M. H., & Ferraro, K. F. (2011). The stigma of obesity: does perceived weight discrimination affect identity and physical health? Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(1), 76–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schallenkamp, K., DeBeaumont, R., & Houy, J. (2012). Weight-based discrimination in the workplace: is legal protection necessary. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 24(4), 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singletary, S. L., & Hebl, M. R. (2009). Compensatory strategies for reducing interpersonal discrimination: the effectiveness of acknowledgments, increased positivity, and individuating information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 797–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, L. A., Carmichael, J. S., Blackwell, L. V., Cleveland, J. N., & Thornton, G. C. (2010). Perceptions of discrimination and justice among employees with disabilities. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 22(1), 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Division of Human Rights v. Xerox Corporation, 480N.E.2d 695 (N.Y. 1985).

  • Teachman, B. A., Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., Rawlins, M., & Jeyaram, S. (2003). Demonstrations of implicit bias: the impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychology, 22, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolsen, F. (2007). The boundaries of litigating unconscious discrimination: firm-based remedies in response to a hostile judiciary. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 33, 347–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, C. B., & Meginnis-Payne, K. L. (2001). Beauty, politics and patriarchy: The impact on women’s lives. In J. Worell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender, Vol. 1 (pp. 189–2000). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsenkova, V. K., Carr, D., Schoeller, D. A., & Ryff, C. D. (2011). Perceived weight discrimination amplifies the link between central adiposity and nondiabetic glycemic control. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 41(2), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. F., & Turner, C. B. (1975). Race, sex, and perception of opportunity structure among college students. Social Science Quarterly, 16, 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westaby, J. D., & Braithwaite, K. N. (2003). Specific factors underlying reemployment self-efficacy: comparing control belief and motivational reason methods for recently unemployed. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(4), 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, A., Matthews, R.G., & Hudson, K. (2005, Oct 27). Can employers alter hiring practices to cut health care costs? Wall Street Journal, B1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Human Resources and Labor Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Mark V. Roehling

  2. Department of Psychology, Hope College, Holland, MI, 49423, USA

    Patricia V. Roehling

  3. The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, 79968-0539, USA

    Maria Fernanda Wagstaff

Authors
  1. Mark V. Roehling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricia V. Roehling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Fernanda Wagstaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark V. Roehling.

Additional information

The reported research was supported by funding from the Institute for Public Policy and Social Research at Michigan State University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roehling, M.V., Roehling, P.V. & Wagstaff, M.F. Sex Differences in Perceived Weight-Based Employment Discrimination When Weight Discrimination is Illegal. Employ Respons Rights J 25, 159–176 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-013-9217-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-013-9217-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation