Abstract
In the history of disasters in Venice, there are implications for modern times in terms of complex systems management and emerging threats, in particular from examples of risk management and resilience achieved by the Venetian state during outbreaks of the plague. In fourteenth century Venice, risk assessment the way we practice it today would fail to provide meaningful recommendations to reduce the casualty rate of the plague epidemic because the cause and transmission of the disease was not understood. Instead, a set of systemic actions across the social, economic, and transportation networks of the city taken by officials and doctors eventually slowed and arguably stopped the spread of the disease. These latter actions are an early example of what is now considered resilience management. Resilience management improves a complex system’s ability to prepare, absorb, recover, and adapt to unexpected threats and does so by address the capabilities at a system, rather than component, level. Resilience management can be a guide to addressing current issues of population growth and rising sea level in modern day Venice and across the globe. This paper calls for integration of resilience assessment in comprehensive risk and resilience management framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Council of the European Union (2013). Council conclusions on EU approach to resilience. 3241st Foreign Affairs Council meeting, Brussels, 28 May 2013
Covello VT, Mumpower J (1985) Risk analysis and risk management: an historical perspective. Risk Anal 5:103–120. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00159.x
Executive Order 13653 (2013) Preparing the United States for the impacts of Climate Change. The White House. 1 Nov 2013
Kaplan Stanley, John Garrick B (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1:11–27
Konstantinidou K, Mantadakis E, Falagas ME, Sardi T, Samonis G. (2009) Role of Venetian rule in control of plague epidemics on the Ionian Islands during 17th and 18th centuries. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2009 Jan [date cited]. http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/15/1/39.htm
Linkov I, Eisenberg DA, Bates ME, Chang D, Convertino M, Allen JH, Flynn SE, Seager TP (2013a) Measurable resilience for actionable policy. Environ Sci Technol 47:10108–10110
Linkov I, Eisenberg DA, Plourde K, Seager TP, Allen J, Kott A (2013b) Resilience metrics for cyber systems. Environ Syst Decis 33:471–476
Linkov I, Bridges T, Fox-Lent C, Kröger W, Levermann A, Renn O et al (2014) Changing the resilience paradigm. Nat Clim Chang 4:407–409
McCoy T (2014) Everything you know about the black death is wrong. The Washington post. 31 March 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/03/31/everything-you-know-about-the-black-death-is-wrong-say-the-bones/
Park J, Seager TP, Rao PCS, Convertino M, Linkov I (2013) Contrasting risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems. Risk Anal 33:356–367
Poggioli S. (2009) “Billion-dollar floodgates might not save Venice. National Public Radio. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112995748. 19 Sep 2009. Accessed 29 April 2013
Presidential Proclamation (2013). Critical infrastructure security and resilience month. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/10/31/presidential-proclamation-critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilienc
Singh D (2014) “US$6.7 billion floodgates to protect Venice in 2014.” The United Nations office for disaster risk reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/archive/30174. Accessed 29 April 2014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Linkov, I., Fox-Lent, C., Keisler, J. et al. Risk and resilience lessons from Venice. Environ Syst Decis 34, 378–382 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9511-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9511-8