Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring Environmental and Economic Trade-offs Associated with Aggregate Recycling from Decommissioned Forest Roads

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest road decommissioning is a pro-active mechanism for preventing future habitat degradation and for increasing the likelihood of endangered salmonid survival in the western U.S. High implementation costs however preclude many desirable projects from being undertaken, especially on federally owned land. Previous research and real-world applications have demonstrated the cost savings potential of reusing aggregate recovered from forest roads during decommissioning. These cost savings can effectively subsidize decommissioning projects, suggesting an economic benefit associated with improving environmental benefit. We present a mixed integer, multiple objective formulation to identify the efficient trade-off surface between conflicting economic and environmental criteria, where environmental benefit is defined as the hazard weighted length of roads decommissioned. We compare nondominated frontiers identified with and without the opportunity to recycle aggregate. Our results suggest that aggregate recycling promotes a synergistic relationship between cost savings (subsidy) and environmental performance, where subsidies generally increase with increasing environmental performance. Effective subsidy values can reach 31% of total expenditure, at the maximum level of environmental benefit. Transportation managers are therefore able to recover and reuse a nonrenewable resource, while at the same time promoting economic and environmental efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Foltz and Truebe [4] considered runoff volume and sediment production in response to simulated rainfall, and rut depth in response to simulated log truck traffic.

  2. http://www.institute.redlands.edu/emds/

  3. Attributes removed from our abbreviated model include information on precipitation, road surface type, a soil erodibility factor, and metrics on the biological condition of aquatic habitat. Since the intent is to describe the relative risk of each road segment, attributes that would be identical for all segments were removed from the model.

References

  1. Allison, C., Sidle, R. C., & Tait, D. (2004). Application of decision analysis to forest road deactivation in unstable terrain. Environmental Management, 33(2), 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aquatic and Riparian Effectiveness Monitoring Program. 2005. Watershed Monitoring for the Northwest Forest Plan: Data Summary Interpretation 2005, Oregon/Washington Coast Province. http://www.reo.gov/monitoring/watershed

  3. Dai, J. J., Lorenzato, S., & Rocke, D. M. (2004). A knowledge-based model of watershed assessment for sediment. Environmental Modelling and Software, 19(4), 423–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Foltz, R., & Truebe, M. (2003). Locally available aggregate and sediment production. Transportation Research Record, 1819, LVR8-1050.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Furniss, M. J., Roelofs, T. D., & Yee, C. S. (1991). Road construction and maintenance. Influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats (pp. 297–323). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gallo, K., Lanigan, S. H., Eldred, P., Gordon, S. N., & Moyer, C. (2005). Northwest forest plan: the first 10 years (1994–2003). Preliminary assessment of the condition of watersheds. General technical report PNW-GTR-647. Portland, Oregon: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  7. GAO. (2001). Restoring fish passage through culverts on forest service and BLM lands in Oregon and Washington could take decades. GAO-02-136.

  8. Girvetz, E., & Shilling, F. (2003). Decision support for road system analysis and modification on the Tahoe national forest. Environmental Management, 32(2), 218–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gucinski, H., Furniss, M. J., Ziemer, R. R., & Brookes, M. H. (2001). Forest roads: a synthesis of scientific information. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-509. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haimes, Y. Y., Lasdon, L. S., & Wismer, D. A. (1971). On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1(3), 296–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harr, R. D., & Nichols, R. A. (1993). Stabilizing forest roads to help restore fish habitats: a northwest Washington example. Fisheries, 18, 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heller, D. (2002). A new paradigm for salmon and watershed restoration. In Proceedings of the 13th International Salmonid Enhancement Workshop: 16–19 September 2002, Hotel Westport, Westport, Co. Mayo, Ireland.

  13. Hicks, B. J., Hall, J. D., Bisson, P. A., & Sedell, J. R. (1991). Responses of salmonids to habitat changes. Ch. 14. In W. R. Meehan (Ed.), Influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats (pp. 483–518). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, J. A., Swanson, F. J., Wemple, B. C., & Snyder, K. U. (2000). Effects of roads on hydrology, geomorphology, and disturbance patches in stream networks. Conservation Biology, 14(1), 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy, M. C., Ford, D. E., Singleton, P., Finney, M., & Agee, J. K. (2008). Informed multi-objective decision-making in environmental management using Pareto optimality. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(1), 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kolka, R. K., & Smidt, M. F. (2004). Effects of forest road amelioration techniques on soil bulk density, surface runoff, sediment transport, soil moisture and seedling growth. Forest Ecology and Management, 202, 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Madej, M. A. (2001). Erosion and sediment delivery following removal of forest roads. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Madej, M. A., Eschenbach, E. A., Diaz, C., Teasley, R., & Baker, K. (2006). Optimization strategies for sediment reduction practices on roads in steep, forested terrain. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31(13), 1643–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mills, K. (2006). Environmental performance measures for forest roads. In W. Chung & H. S. Han (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th council on forest engineering conference (pp. 291–300). Coeur d’Alene, ID: Council on Forest Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nehlsen, W., Williams, J. E., & Lichatowich, J. A. (1991). Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho and Washington. Fisheries, 16(2), 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Newcombe, C. P., & MacDonald, D. D. (1991). Effects of suspended sediments on aquatic ecosystems. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 11, 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Olson, C. M., & Orr, B. (1999). Combining tree growth, fish and wildlife habitat, mass wasting, sedimentation, and hydrologic models in decision analysis and long-term forest land planning. Forest Ecology and Management, 114(2), 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pess, G. R., Beechie, T. J., Williams, J. E., Whitall, D. R., Lange, J. I., & Klochak, J. R. (2003). Watershed assessment techniques and the success of aquatic restoration activities. Chapter 8. In R. C. Wissmar & P. A. Bisson (Eds.), Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rackley, J., & Chung, W. (2008). Incorporating Forest Road Erosion into Forest Resource Transportation Planning: A Case Study in the Mica Creek Watershed in Northern Idaho, Transactions of the ASABE 51(1): 115–127.

  25. Reeves, G. H., Hohler, D. B., Larsen, D. P., Busch, D. P., Kratz, K., Reynolds, K., et al. (2004). Effectiveness monitoring for the aquatic and riparian component of the Northwest Forest Plan: conceptual framework and options. Generate technical report PNW-GTR-577. Portland, Oregon: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reeves, G. H., Williams, J. E., Burnett, K. M., & Gallo, K. (2006). The aquatic conservation strategy of the northwest forest plan. Conservation Biology, 20(2), 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reid, L. M., & Dunne, T. (1984). Sediment production from forest road surfaces. Water Resources Research, 20(11), 1753–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reynolds, K. M. (1999). EMDS users guide (version 2.0): knowledge-based decision support for ecological assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-470. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 63 p.

  29. Reynolds, K. M., & Hessburg, P. F. (2005). Decision support for integrated landscape evaluation and restoration planning. Forest Ecology and Management, 207(1–2), 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reynolds, K. M., Jensen, M., Andreasen, J., & Goodman, I. (2000). Knowledge-based assessment of watershed condition. Computers in Electronics and Agriculture, 27, 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reynolds, K. M., & Peets, S. (2001). Integrated assessment and priorities for protection and restoration of watersheds. In Proceedings of IUFRO 4.11 Conference on Forest Biometry, Modeling and Information Science (pp. 26–29) June 2001, Greenwich, UK, 2001.

  32. Rice, R.M., & Lewis, J. (1991). Estimating Erosion Risks Associated with Logging and Forest Roads in Northwestern California, Water Resources Bulletin 27(5): 809–818.

  33. Roni, P., Beechie, T. J., Bilby, R. E., Leonetti, F. E., Pollock, M. M., & Pess, G. R. (2002). A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 22(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Roper, B. B., Dose, J. J., & Williams, J. E. (1997). Stream restoration: is fisheries biology enough? Fisheries, 22(5), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sample, V. A., Price, W., Donnay, J. S., & Mater, C. M. (2007). National Forest Certification Study. Pinchot Institute for Conservation. http://www.pinchot.org/current_projects/forest_cert/certification Last accessed: November 9, 2009.

  36. Sessions, J., Boston, K., Thoreson, R., & Mills, K. (2006). Optimal policies for managing aggregate resources on temporary forest roads. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 21(4), 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Switalski, T. A., Bissonette, J. A., DeLuca, T. H., & Madej, M. A. (2004). Benefits and impacts of road removal. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(1), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thompson, M., & Sessions, J. (2008). Optimal policies for aggregate recycling from decommissioned forest roads. Environmental Management, 42(2), 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Toth, S. F., McDill, M. E., & Rebain, S. (2006). Finding the efficient frontier of a bi-criteria, spatially explicit, harvest scheduling model. Forest Science, 52(1), 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Trombulak, S. C., & Frissell, C. A. (2000). Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology, 14, 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. USDA and USDI. (1994). Record of decision for amendments to forest service and bureau of land management planning documents within the range of the northern spotted owl and standards and guidelines for management of habitat for late-successional and old-growth forest related species within the range of the northern spotted owl. OR: Portland.

  42. USDA Forest Service. (1999). Roads analysis: informing decisions about managing the national forest transportation system. Misc. Rep. FS-643. Washington DC.

  43. USDA Forest Service. (2001). Road Management Policy Website. http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/road_mgt/policy.shtml Last accessed: November 9, 2009.

  44. USDA Forest Service. (2002). Road Management Website. http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/road_mgt/overview.shtml Last accessed: November 9, 2009.

  45. Van Veldhuizen, D. A., & Lamont, G. B. (2000). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: analyzing the state-of-the-art. Evolutionary Computation, 8(2), 125–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weaver, W., & Hagans, D. (2009). Road upgrading, decommissioning and maintenance—estimating costs on small and large scales. http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st5/Salmon_Workshop/10_Weaver_and_Hagans.pdf Last accessed: November 9, 2009.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The primary author completed most of this work while a graduate student at Oregon State University as the recipient of the Wes and Nancy Lematta and the Dorothy M. Hoener fellowships. The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew P. Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, M.P., Sessions, J. Exploring Environmental and Economic Trade-offs Associated with Aggregate Recycling from Decommissioned Forest Roads. Environ Model Assess 15, 419–432 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-010-9220-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-010-9220-8

Keywords

Navigation