Skip to main content
Log in

How do middle-aged children allocate time and money transfers to their older parents in Europe?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses the determinants of financial and time transfers from adult children to their older parents using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). It is the first survey containing rich comparable interdisciplinary information about individuals aged 50+ from ten European countries (Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland). The first part of the paper highlights the differences in the provision of upward private intergenerational transfers (in terms of both time and money) across the ten European countries. The second part describes the different determinants in the decision to provide time or money transfers to parents and evaluates whether these two types of assistance are substitutes or complements. Results highlight the existence of a substitution between time and money in relation to geographical distance and the existence of a weak substitution regarding the employment status of the middle-aged children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See http://www.share-project.org/

  2. Part-time workers are defined as those usually working fewer than 30 h per week.

  3. The health self-status variable is 1 if the respondent declare having a bad or a very bad health and zero otherwise.

  4. The education variable is harmonized across countries by using the International Standard Classification of Education – 1997 version from UNESCO.

  5. When the father and the mother are still alive, the variable “age” takes the value of the oldest parent and the variable “health status” is a dummy variable that is equal to 1, if at least one parent has a bad or very bad health status.

  6. This information is not directly observable in SHARE data. To compute this variable, we assume that the parents still live together if both are alive and if the geographical distance between the respondent and his father, it is the same as for the mother.

  7. The exclusion criteria adopted in this analysis are: The age of the oldest parent must not exceed 110 years and the parents have to be at least 14 years older than their children.All observations included in the first and last percentile of the income distribution are discarded from the analysis.

  8. We do not show the amount of financial transfer because of the small sample size.

  9. Throughout this paper, we will refer to three main groups of countries: Northern countries: Sweden, Denmark and Netherlands; Western countries: Germany, France, Austria and Switzerland; Mediterranean countries: Italy, Spain and Greece.

  10. To construct this figure, we add to our selected sample the adult children living in the same household as their parents. We then assume that cohabiting children are those that live in the same household or the same building as their parents.

  11. We do not use a tobit model because the tobit assumes that the impact of the explanatory variables on the decision to make a transfer and its intensity has the same sign. However, descriptive statistics on time and financial transfers by country show that this is not necessarily the case.

  12. The number of adult children providing financial assistance to their parents is only 125 for the ten European countries.

  13. We estimated the model with women only and found roughly the same results.

  14. These coefficients are underestimated if children’s income is positively correlated to parental income and where the probability of financial transfer to the parents is negatively correlated to parental income.

References

  • Arrondel L, Masson A (2001) Family transfers involving three generations. Scand J Econ 103(3):415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assous L, Ralle P (2000) La prise en charge de la dépendance des personnes âgées: une comparaison internationale. Etudes et Résultats 74

  • Carmichael F, Charles S (1998) The labour market costs of community care. J Health Econ 17:747–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox D (1987) Motives for private income transfers. J Polit Econ 95:508–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettner S (1996) The opportunity costs of elder care. J Hum Resour 31(1):189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides Y, Kan K (1999) The nature of two-directional intergenerational transfers of money and time: an empirical analysis. Tufts University Discussion Paper 99–17

  • Jacobzone S (1999) Ageing and care for frail elderly persons: an overview of international perspectives. Series OECD Labour Market and Social Policy – Occasional Papers, No. 38. Paris, OECD

  • McGarry K (1999) Inter vivos transfers and intended bequests. J Public Econ 73:321–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarry K, Schoeni RF (1995) Transfer behavior in the health and retirement study: measurement and the distribution of resources within the family. J Hum Resour 30:S184-S226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarry K (2006) Does caregiving affect work? Evidence based on prior labour force experience. In: Wise DA (ed) Health care issues in the United States and Japan. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton CN, Van Houtven CH (2006) Inter-vivos transfers and exchange. South Econ J 73(1):157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) The OECD health project: long-term care for older people

  • Sloan FA, Zhang HH, Wang J (2002) Upstream intergenerational transfers. South Econ J 69(2):363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern S (1995) Estimating family long-term care decisions in the presence of endogenous child characteristics. J Hum Resour 30(3):551–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf D, Soldo B (1994) Married women’s allocation of time to employment and parental care. J Hum Resour 29(4):1259–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zissimopoulos J (2001) Resource transfers to the elderly: do adult children substitute financial transfers for time transfers? RAND Working Paper 01–05

Download references

Acknowledgments

The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the 5th framework programme (project QLK6-CT-2001-00360 in the thematic programme Quality of Life). Additional funding came from the US National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, Y1-AG-4553-01 and OGHA 04-064). Data collection in Austria (through the Austrian Science Foundation, FWF), Belgium (through the Belgian Science Policy Administration) and Switzerland (through BBW/OFES/UFES) was nationally funded. The SHARE data set is introduced in Börsch-Supan et al. (2005); methodological details are contained in Börsch-Supan and Jürges (2005). The author acknowledges Izabela Jelovac, Pierre Thomas Leger, Sergio Perelman and Pierre Pestieau for their useful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Bonsang.

Additional information

This paper uses data from early release 1 of SHARE 2004. This release is preliminary and may contain errors that will be corrected in later releases.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonsang, E. How do middle-aged children allocate time and money transfers to their older parents in Europe?. Empirica 34, 171–188 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-007-9034-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-007-9034-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation