Abstract
Objective:Many prognostic factors, exceeding 150, for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are mentioned in the literature. The different statistical weight of the some variables at issue, their heterogeneity and their clinical uselessness is reviewed. Study design and setting: Survival analysis of a cohort of NSCLC operated (n = 1730, 1993–1997) was carried out utilizing different statistical approaches: Cox proportional hazard analysis (CPHA), logistic regression (LRA), and recursive partitioning (CART). Results:CPHA identified 13 prognostic variables and 11 LRA. Of the 17 possible variables, 10 are coincident. CART provided five different diagnostic groups but only three differentiated survival levels. Parsimonious models were constructed including only T and N cancer staging variables. Areas under the ROC curve of 0.68 and 0.68 were found for CPHA and LGA parsimonious models respectively, and 0.72 and 0.71 for complete models. Conclusion: Variables with a minimal impact on the respective models and thus with little or scarce predictive clinical repercussion were identified. Differences in the prognostic profile of survival can be caused by the different methodological approaches used. No relevant differences were found between the parsimonious and complete models. Although the amount of information managed is considerable, there continues to be a large predictive gap yet to be explained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P Boyle A d’Onofrio P Maisonneuve et al. (2003) ArticleTitleMeasuring progress against cancer in Europe: Has the 15% decline targeted for 2000 come about? Ann Oncol 14 1312–1325 Occurrence Handle12881398 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szkvVejsQ%3D%3D
H Skuladottir JH Olsen (2001) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of lung cancer Eur Respir Mon 17 1–12
LH Sobin Ch Wittekind (1997) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. UICC International Union Against Cancer EditionNumber5 Wiley-Liss New York, NY
A López-Encuentra H Bülzebruck AR Feinstein et al. (2000) ArticleTitleTumor staging and classificatión in lung cancer Lung Cancer 29 79–83 Occurrence Handle10970143
López-Encuentra A, Duque-Medina JL, Rami-Porta R, Gómez de la Cámara A, Ferrando P for the Bronchogenic Carcinoma Co-operative Group of the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery. Staging in lung cancer: Is 3 cm a prognostic threshold in pathologic stage I non-small cell lung cancer? A multicenter Study of 1,020 patients. Chest 2002; 121: 1515–1520
MK Gospodarowicz DE Henson RVP Hutter et al. (2001) Prognostic Factors in Cancer EditionNumber2 Wiley-Liss New York, NY
MD Brundage D Davies WJ Mackillop (2002) ArticleTitlePrognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer. A decade of progress Chest 122 1037–1057 Occurrence Handle10.1378/chest.122.3.1037 Occurrence Handle12226051
InstitutionalAuthorNameGrupo Cooperativo de Carcinoma Broncogénico de SEPAR (GCCB-S) (1995) ArticleTitleCirugía del carcinoma broncogénico en España. Estudio descriptivo Arch Bronconeumol 31 303–309
López Encuentra A, the Bronchogenic Carcinoma Cooperative Group of the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (GCCB-S), 1998; Criteria of functional and oncological operability in surgery for lung cancer. A multicenter study. Lung Cancer 1995; 20: 161–168
López Encuentra A, Gómez de la Cámara A, for the Bronchogenic Carcinoma Cooperative Group of the Spanish Society of Pneumology, Thoracic Surger (GCCB-S). Validation of a central review board of staging prior to surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer – impact on prognosis: a multicenter study. Respiration 2002; 69: 16–24
López Encuentra A, Gómez de la Cámara A, Varela de Ugarte A, Mañes N, Llobregat N y GCCB-S. El “fenómerno Will-Rogers”. Migración de estadios en carcinoma broncogénico, tras aplicar criterios de certeza clasificatoria. Arch Bronconeumol 2002; 38: 166–171
InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Thoracic Society (1983) ArticleTitleClinical staging primary lung cancer Am Rev Respir Dis 127 1–6
JR Izbicki B Passlick O Karg et al. (1995) ArticleTitleImpact of radical systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy on tumor staging in lung cancer Ann Thorac Surg 59 209–214 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0003-4975(94)00717-L Occurrence Handle7818326 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M7hvVWgsw%3D%3D
InstitutionalAuthorNameGrupo Cooperativo de Carcinoma Broncogénico de SEPAR (GCCB-S) (1996) ArticleTitleControl de calidad en un registro multiinstitucional de carcinoma broncogénico Arch Bronconeumol 32 IssueIDsuppl 2 70
AR Feinstein CK Wells SD Walter (1990) ArticleTitleA Comparison of multivariable mathematical methods for predicting survival-I. Introduction, rationale, and general strategy J Clin Epidemiol 43 339–347 Occurrence Handle2324775 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c3hvVWktA%3D%3D
J Wasson HC Sox RK Neff L Goldman (1985) ArticleTitleClinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards N Engl J Med 313 793–799 Occurrence Handle3897864 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M3ps1Wgug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM198509263131306
F Cook L Goldman (1984) ArticleTitleEmpiric comparison of multivariate analytic techniques: Advantages and disadvantages of recursive partitioning analysis J Chron Dis 37 721–731 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9681(84)90041-9 Occurrence Handle6501544 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2FlsFersA%3D%3D
SD Walter AR Feinstein CK Wells (1990) ArticleTitleA comparison of multivariable mathematical methods for predicting survival-II. Statistical selection of prognostic variables J Clin Epidemiol 43 349–359 Occurrence Handle2324776 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c3hvVWktQ%3D%3D
H Mitchell Katz (2003) ArticleTitleMultivariable análisis: A primer for readers of medical research Ann Intern Med 138 644–650
WJ Long JL HP Griffith Selker RB D’Agostino (1993) ArticleTitleA comparison of logistic regression to decision-tree induction in a medical domain Comput. Biomed Res. 26 74–97 Occurrence Handle10.1006/cbmr.1993.1005 Occurrence Handle8444029 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s7osFertQ%3D%3D
ME Stokes ChS Davis GG Koch (1995) Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS® System SAS institute Inc Cary, NC 499
InstitutionalAuthorNameSAS Institute Inc., (1996) SAS/STAT® Sofware: Changes and Enhancements Through Release 6.11 SAS Institute inc Cary, NC 1104
A Laupacis G Wells WS Richardson P Tugwell (1994) ArticleTitleUsers’ guides to the medical literature. V. How to use an article about prognosis. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group JAMA 272 234–237 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.272.3.234 Occurrence Handle8022043 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3ptlCnsA%3D%3D
Mountain. Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest 1997; 111: 1718–1723.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
*A complete list of GCCB-S members is given in the Appendix A. **Partly financed by FIS grant 97/0011, FEPAR-1995 grant, Red-Respira-RTIC-C-03–011 grant, Castilla-León regional government, Menarini Foundation and Red-MBE-RTIC-02/093.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de la Cámara, A.G., López-Encuentra, A., Ferrando, P. et al. Heterogeneity of Prognostic Profiles in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Too Many Variables but a Few Relevant. Eur J Epidemiol 20, 907–914 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-3634-7
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-3634-7