Abstract
According to international law, straddling fish stocks should be managed cooperatively through regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs). This paper analyzes the stability and success of these organizations through a game in partition function form based on the classical Gordon-Schaefer bioeconomic model. Results show that the larger the number of fishing states that compete for the fish stock the higher are the relative gains from full cooperation, but the lower is the likelihood of large RFMOs being stable. It is also shown that new entrants increase the incentives of RFMO members to leave and decrease the incentives of non-members to join it. Moreover, the success of coalition formation is positively correlated with the degree of cost asymmetry among fishing states and negatively with the overall level of efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrett S (1994) Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxford Econ Papers 46: 878–894
Barrett S (2003) Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, New York
Bjørndal T, Martin S (2007) Recommended best practices for regional fisheries management organizations—technical study no. 3. The relevance of bioeconomic modelling to RFMO resources—a survey of the literature. Chatham House, London
Bloch F (2003) Non-cooperative models of coalition formation in games with spillovers. In: Carraro C (eds) The endogenous formation of economic coalitions, Chap. 2. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 35–79
Carraro C (2000) Roads towards international environmental agreements. In: Siebert H (eds) The economics of international environmental problems. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 169–202
Carraro C, Eyckmans J, Finus M (2006) Optimal transfers and participation decisions in international environmental agreements. Rev Int Organ 1(4): 379–396
Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1993) Strategies for the international protection of the environment. J Public Econ 52(3): 309–328
Clark CW, Munro G (1975) The economics of fishing and modern capital theory: a simplified approach. J Environ Econ Manage 2(2): 92–106
d’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A, Gabszewicz JJ, Weymark JA (1983) On the stability of collusive price leadership. Canadian J Econ 16(1): 17–25
Dellink R, Finus M, Olieman N (2008) The stability likelihood of an international climate agreement. Environ Resour Econ 39(4): 357–377
Eyckmans J, Finus M (2004) An almost ideal sharing scheme for coalition games with externalities. Working paper no. 155.2004, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Italy. Current version as presented at the 7th meeting on game theory and practice dedicated to energy, environment and natural resources, May 2007, Montreal, Canada.
FAO: (2007) The sate of world fisheries and aquaculture: 2006. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome
Finus M (2003) Stability and design of international environmental agreements: the case of global and transboundary pollution. In: Folmer H, Tietenberg T (eds) International yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2003/4, Chap. 3. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 82–158
Finus M (2008) Game theoretic research on the design of international environmental agreements: insights, critical remarks and future challenges. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 2(1): 29–67
Fuentes-Albero C, Rubio SJ (2005) Can the international environmental cooperation be bought? SSRN-working paper no. 773988
Gordon HS (1954) The economic theory of a common property resource: the fishery. J Political Econ 62(2): 124–142
Hannesson R (1997) Fishing as a supergame. J Environ Econ Manage 32(3): 309–322
High Seas Task Force (2006) Closing the net: stopping illegal fishing on the high seas. Government of Australia, Canada, Chile, Namibia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, WWF, IUCN and the Earth Institute at Columbia University.
Kaitala V, Munro G (1997) The conservation and management of high seas fishery resources under the new law of the sea. Natur Resour Model 10: 87–108
Kennedy J (2003) Scope for efficient multinational exploitation of North-East Atlantic Mackerel. Marine Resour Econ 18: 55–80
Kronbak LG, Lindroos M (2006) An enforcement-coalition model: fishermen and authorities forming coalitions. Environ Resour Econo 35(3): 169–194
Kwon O (2006) Partial international coordination in the Great Fish War. Environ Resour Econ 33(4): 463–483
Lind DA, Marchal WG, Wathen SA (2005) Statistical techniques in business & economics, (twelfth edition). McGraw-Hill, New York
Lindroos M (2004) Sharing the benefits of cooperation in the Norwegian Spring-spawning Herring Fishery. Int Game Theory Rev 6(1): 35–53
Lindroos M (2008) Coalitions in international fisheries management. Natur Resour Model 21(3): 366–384
Lodge MW, Anderson D, Lǿbach T, Munro G, Sainsbury K, Willock A (2007) Recommended best practices for regional fisheries management organizations: report of an independent panel to develop a model for improved governance by regional fisheries management organizations. Chatham House, London
McGinty M (2007) International environmental agreements among asymmetric nations. Oxford Econ Papers 59(1): 45–62
McKelvey RW, Sandal LK, Steinshamn SI (2003) Regional fisheries management on the high seas: the hit-and-run interloper model. Int Game Theory Rev 5(4): 327–345
Mesterton-Gibbons M (1993) Game-theoretic resource modeling. Natur Resour Model 7(2): 93–147
Munro G, van Houtte A, Willmann R (2004) The conservation and management of shared fish stocks: legal and economic aspects. FAO fisheries technical paper no. 465, Rome
Pham DH, Folmer H (2006) International fisheries agreements: the feasibility and impacts of partial cooperation. In: Aronsson T, Axelsson R, Brännlund R (eds) The theory and practice of environmental and resource economics: essays in honour of K.-G. Löfgren ch. 8. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 146–171
Pintassilgo P (2003) A coalition approach to the management of high seas fisheries in the presence of externalities. Natur Resour Model 16(2): 175–197
Pintassilgo P, Costa Duarte C (2000) The new-member problem in the cooperative management of high seas fisheries. Marine Resour Econ 15(4): 361–378
Pintassilgo P, Lindroos M (2008) Coalition formation in straddling stock fisheries: a partition function approach. Int Game Theory Rev 10(3): 303–317
Ruseski G (1998) International fish wars: the strategic roles for fleet licensing and effort subsidies. J Environ Econ Manage 36(1): 70–88
Tarui N, Mason CF, Polasky S, Ellis G (2008) Cooperative in the commons with unobservable actions. J Environ Econ Manage 55(1): 37–51
United Nations (1982). United Nations Convention on the law of the sea. UN Doc. A/Conf.62/122.
United Nations (1995). United Nations conference on straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea of 10 Dec 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. UN Doc. A/Conf./164/37
Weikard H-P (2009) Cartel stability under optimal sharing rule. The Manchester School 77(5): 575–593
Yi S-S (2003) Endogeneous formation of economic coalitions: a survey of the partition function approach. In: Carraro C (eds) The endogeneous formation of economic coalitions. The Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) series on economics and the environment, Chap. 3. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 80–127
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pintassilgo, P., Finus, M., Lindroos, M. et al. Stability and Success of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations. Environ Resource Econ 46, 377–402 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9346-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9346-9
Keywords
- Bioeconomic model
- Coalition formation model
- Free-riding
- Regional fisheries management organizations
- Straddling fish stock
- Unregulated fishing