Skip to main content
Log in

Stability and Success of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to international law, straddling fish stocks should be managed cooperatively through regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs). This paper analyzes the stability and success of these organizations through a game in partition function form based on the classical Gordon-Schaefer bioeconomic model. Results show that the larger the number of fishing states that compete for the fish stock the higher are the relative gains from full cooperation, but the lower is the likelihood of large RFMOs being stable. It is also shown that new entrants increase the incentives of RFMO members to leave and decrease the incentives of non-members to join it. Moreover, the success of coalition formation is positively correlated with the degree of cost asymmetry among fishing states and negatively with the overall level of efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett S (1994) Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxford Econ Papers 46: 878–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S (2003) Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørndal T, Martin S (2007) Recommended best practices for regional fisheries management organizations—technical study no. 3. The relevance of bioeconomic modelling to RFMO resources—a survey of the literature. Chatham House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch F (2003) Non-cooperative models of coalition formation in games with spillovers. In: Carraro C (eds) The endogenous formation of economic coalitions, Chap. 2. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 35–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C (2000) Roads towards international environmental agreements. In: Siebert H (eds) The economics of international environmental problems. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 169–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C, Eyckmans J, Finus M (2006) Optimal transfers and participation decisions in international environmental agreements. Rev Int Organ 1(4): 379–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1993) Strategies for the international protection of the environment. J Public Econ 52(3): 309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Munro G (1975) The economics of fishing and modern capital theory: a simplified approach. J Environ Econ Manage 2(2): 92–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A, Gabszewicz JJ, Weymark JA (1983) On the stability of collusive price leadership. Canadian J Econ 16(1): 17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellink R, Finus M, Olieman N (2008) The stability likelihood of an international climate agreement. Environ Resour Econ 39(4): 357–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyckmans J, Finus M (2004) An almost ideal sharing scheme for coalition games with externalities. Working paper no. 155.2004, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Italy. Current version as presented at the 7th meeting on game theory and practice dedicated to energy, environment and natural resources, May 2007, Montreal, Canada.

  • FAO: (2007) The sate of world fisheries and aquaculture: 2006. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Finus M (2003) Stability and design of international environmental agreements: the case of global and transboundary pollution. In: Folmer H, Tietenberg T (eds) International yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2003/4, Chap. 3. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 82–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Finus M (2008) Game theoretic research on the design of international environmental agreements: insights, critical remarks and future challenges. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 2(1): 29–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes-Albero C, Rubio SJ (2005) Can the international environmental cooperation be bought? SSRN-working paper no. 773988

  • Gordon HS (1954) The economic theory of a common property resource: the fishery. J Political Econ 62(2): 124–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannesson R (1997) Fishing as a supergame. J Environ Econ Manage 32(3): 309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • High Seas Task Force (2006) Closing the net: stopping illegal fishing on the high seas. Government of Australia, Canada, Chile, Namibia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, WWF, IUCN and the Earth Institute at Columbia University.

  • Kaitala V, Munro G (1997) The conservation and management of high seas fishery resources under the new law of the sea. Natur Resour Model 10: 87–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J (2003) Scope for efficient multinational exploitation of North-East Atlantic Mackerel. Marine Resour Econ 18: 55–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronbak LG, Lindroos M (2006) An enforcement-coalition model: fishermen and authorities forming coalitions. Environ Resour Econo 35(3): 169–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon O (2006) Partial international coordination in the Great Fish War. Environ Resour Econ 33(4): 463–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind DA, Marchal WG, Wathen SA (2005) Statistical techniques in business & economics, (twelfth edition). McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos M (2004) Sharing the benefits of cooperation in the Norwegian Spring-spawning Herring Fishery. Int Game Theory Rev 6(1): 35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos M (2008) Coalitions in international fisheries management. Natur Resour Model 21(3): 366–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge MW, Anderson D, Lǿbach T, Munro G, Sainsbury K, Willock A (2007) Recommended best practices for regional fisheries management organizations: report of an independent panel to develop a model for improved governance by regional fisheries management organizations. Chatham House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinty M (2007) International environmental agreements among asymmetric nations. Oxford Econ Papers 59(1): 45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey RW, Sandal LK, Steinshamn SI (2003) Regional fisheries management on the high seas: the hit-and-run interloper model. Int Game Theory Rev 5(4): 327–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesterton-Gibbons M (1993) Game-theoretic resource modeling. Natur Resour Model 7(2): 93–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro G, van Houtte A, Willmann R (2004) The conservation and management of shared fish stocks: legal and economic aspects. FAO fisheries technical paper no. 465, Rome

  • Pham DH, Folmer H (2006) International fisheries agreements: the feasibility and impacts of partial cooperation. In: Aronsson T, Axelsson R, Brännlund R (eds) The theory and practice of environmental and resource economics: essays in honour of K.-G. Löfgren ch. 8. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 146–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintassilgo P (2003) A coalition approach to the management of high seas fisheries in the presence of externalities. Natur Resour Model 16(2): 175–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintassilgo P, Costa Duarte C (2000) The new-member problem in the cooperative management of high seas fisheries. Marine Resour Econ 15(4): 361–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintassilgo P, Lindroos M (2008) Coalition formation in straddling stock fisheries: a partition function approach. Int Game Theory Rev 10(3): 303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruseski G (1998) International fish wars: the strategic roles for fleet licensing and effort subsidies. J Environ Econ Manage 36(1): 70–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarui N, Mason CF, Polasky S, Ellis G (2008) Cooperative in the commons with unobservable actions. J Environ Econ Manage 55(1): 37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1982). United Nations Convention on the law of the sea. UN Doc. A/Conf.62/122.

  • United Nations (1995). United Nations conference on straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea of 10 Dec 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. UN Doc. A/Conf./164/37

  • Weikard H-P (2009) Cartel stability under optimal sharing rule. The Manchester School 77(5): 575–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi S-S (2003) Endogeneous formation of economic coalitions: a survey of the partition function approach. In: Carraro C (eds) The endogeneous formation of economic coalitions. The Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) series on economics and the environment, Chap. 3. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 80–127

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Pintassilgo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pintassilgo, P., Finus, M., Lindroos, M. et al. Stability and Success of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations. Environ Resource Econ 46, 377–402 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9346-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9346-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation