Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pattern VEPs before and after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pattern visual evoked potentials (pVEPs) were used to assess the visual function before, and 1 and 6 months after removal of an idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) from eight eyes. All patients underwent a standard three-port pars plana vitrectomy to remove the ERM removal and cataract surgery. pVEPs were elicited by check sizes of 15′, 30′, 60′, and 120′ with a reversal rate of 2 reversals/s. One hundred responses were averaged with an analysis time of 300 ms. The amplitude ratio (affected eye/fellow eye) of the P100 component were significantly larger at 6 months with smaller check sizes, and the increase was accompanied by an improvement of the VA. The mean peak latency of P100 did not change significantly for all check sizes. We conclude that the improvement of the P100 amplitude with smaller check sizes resulted from the recovery of visual function after the ERM removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hirokawa H, Jalkh AE, Takahashi M et al (1986) Role of the vitreous in idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol 101:166–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Laqua H. (1978) Pigmented macular pucker. Am J Ophthalmol 86:56–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald HR, Verre WP, Aaberg TM (1986) Surgical management of idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology 93:978–983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shinoda K, Ishida S, Kawashima S et al (2000) A new method for quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membrane. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:424–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moschos M, Apostolopoulos M, Ladas J et al (2001) Assessment of macular function by multifocal electroretinogram before and after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina 21:590–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Niwa T, Terasaki H, Kondo M et al (2003) Function and morphology of macula before and after removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1652–1656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arimura E, Matsumoto C, Okuyama S et al (2005) Retinal contraction and metamorphopsia scores in eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2961–2966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghazi-Nouri SM, Tranos PG, Rubin GS et al (2006) Visual function and quality of life following vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peel surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 90:559–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Witkin AJ, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG et al (2006) Redefining lamellar holes and the vitreomacular interface: an ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology 113:388–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holder GE (2004) Electrophysiological assessment of optic nerve disease. Eye 18:1133–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perossini M, Turio E, Perossini T et al (2005) Pattern VEP alterations in psoriatic patients may indicate a sub clinic optic neuritis. Doc Ophthalmol 110:203–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Atilla H, Tekeli O, Ornek K et al (2006) Pattern electroretinography and visual evoked potentials in optic nerve diseases. J Clin Neurosci 13:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lennerstrand G (1982) Delayed visual evoked cortical potentials in retinal disease. Acta Ophthalmol Copenh 60:497–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bass SJ, Sherman J, Bodis-Wollner I et al (1985) Visual evoked potentials in macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:1071–1074

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ueda M, Adachi-Usami E (1992) Assessment of central visual function after successful retinal detachment surgery by pattern visual evoked cortical potentials. Br J Ophthalmol 768:482–485

    Google Scholar 

  16. Negishi C, Takasoh M, Fujimoto N et al (2001) Visual evoked potentials in relation to visual acuity in macular disease. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79:271–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta MC, Katsumi O, Buzney SM et al (1992) Pattern reversal visual-evoked response as a prognostic indicator in macular gliosis. Am J Ophthalmol 113:39–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tilanus MA, Cuypers MH, Bemelmans NA et al (1997) Prognostic value of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:474–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bemelmans NA, Tilanus MA, Cuypers MH et al (1997) Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in patients with epiretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 123:97–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ohn YH, Katsumi O, Matsui Y et al (1994) Snellen visual acuity versus pattern reversal Visual-evoked response acuity in clinical applications. Ophthalmic Res 26:240–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Odom JV, Bach M, Barber C et al (2004) Visual evoked potentials Standard. Doc Ophthalmol 108:115–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Adachi-Usami E (1980) Stimulus field, element size and human visually evoked cortical potentials. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 23:227–235

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Mizota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suami, M., Mizota, A., Hotta, Y. et al. Pattern VEPs before and after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Doc Ophthalmol 114, 67–73 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-006-9039-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-006-9039-4

Keywords

Navigation