Skip to main content
Log in

Coherence Between Attentional and Memory Biases in Sad and Formerly Depressed Individuals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive theories assume a uniform processing bias across different samples, but the empirical support for this claim is rather weak and inconsistent. Therefore, coherence between biases across different cognitive domains in a sample of 133 non-depressed (Study 1) and a sample of 266 formerly depressed individuals (Study 2) was examined. In both studies, individuals were selected after a successful sad mood induction procedure. A Dot Probe task, an Emotional Stroop task and a self-referential Incidental Learning and Free Recall task were administered to all participants. Principle component analyses indicated coherence between attentional and memory bias in non-depressed, while in formerly depressed individuals distinct components for attentional biases and for memory bias were uncovered. The data suggest that in formerly depressed individuals, self-referent processing during encoding may be related to memory bias, whereas in non-depressed individuals memory bias may be related to both attentional bias and self-referent processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington. DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Beard, C., Sawyer, A. T., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Behavior Therapy, 43, 724–740.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression: New perspectives. In P. J. Clayton & J. E. Barrett (Eds.), Treatment of depression: Old controversies and new approaches (pp. 315–350). New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (2008). The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological correlates. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 969–977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory manual (2nd ed.). Sabn Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beevers, C. G., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Attentional bias and mood persistence as prospective predictors of dysphoria. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 619–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

  • Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., & Lee, S. C. (1997). Attentional biases for negative information in induced and naturally occurring dysphoria. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 911–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, P., Kemp, A., Silberstein, R. B., & Nathan, P. J. (2002). Test–retest reliability of the emotional Stroop task: Examining the paradox of measurement change. The Journal of Psychology, 136, 514–520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. J., Beevers, C. G., & Wells, T. T. (2011). Attention allocation and incidental recognition of emotional information in dysphoria. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35, 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everaert, J., Koster, E. H. W., & Derakshan, N. (2012). The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 413–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1995). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorderspatient version 2.0 (SCID-1/P). New York: Biometrics Research Dept, New York State Psychiatric Institute.

  • Fitzgerald, D. A., Arnold, J. F., Becker, E. S., Speckens, A. E., Rinck, M., Rijpkema, M., et al. (2011). How mood challenges emotional memory formation: An fMRI investigation. Neuroimage, 56, 1783–1790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotlib, I. H., & Joormann, J. (2010). Cognition and depression: Current status and fututre directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 285–312.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotlib, I. H., Kasch, K. L., Traill, S., Joormann, J., Arnow, B. A., & Johnson, S. L. (2004). Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 386–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallion, L. S., & Ruscio, A. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 940–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, P. T., & Mathews, A. (2011). Cognitive bias modification: Past perspectives, current findings, and future applications. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, C. R., Clark, D. M., & Mathews, A. (2006). Imagery and interpretations in social phobia: Support for the combined cognitive biases hypothesis. Behavior Therapy, 37, 223–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joormann, J., Dkane, M., & Gotlib, I. H. (2006). Adaptive and maladaptive domponents of rumination? Diagnostic specificity and relation to depressive biases. Behavior Therapy, 37, 269–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joormann, J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2007). Selective attention to emotional faces following recovery from depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 80–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koster, E. H. W., De Raedt, R., Leyman, L., & De Lissnyder, E. (2010). Mood-congruent attention and memory bias in dysphoria: Exploring the coherence among information-processing biases. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 219–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute, Psychology section, Department of Clinical Neuroscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approached to emotiona and emotional disorders. Annual Review Psychology, 45, 25–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review Clinical Psychology, 1, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matt, G. E., Vazquez, C., & Campbell, W. K. (1992). Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 227–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, S. B., Gotlib, A. H., & Martin, R. A. (2000). Cognitive vulnerability for depression: Deployment of attention as a function of history of depression and current mood state. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 427–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, W., & Sabini, J. (1990). Mood and memory under natural conditions: Evidence for mood-incongruent recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peckham, A. D., McHugh, R. K., & Otto, M. W. (2010). A meta-analyses of the magnitude of biased attentional in depression. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 1135–1142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phaf, R. H., van der Leij, A. R., Stienen, B. M. C., & Bierman, D. (2006). Positieve, neutrale en negatieve woorden bij minimale aanbieding: Een ordening door perceptuele clarificatie [Positive, neutral and negative words at minimal presentation levels: Ordering by perceptual clarification]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Technical Report, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raes, F., Williams, J. M. G., & Hermans, D. (2009). Reducing cognitive vulnerability to depression: A preliminary investigation of MEmory Specificity Training (MEST) in inpatients with depressive symptomatology. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 24–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1958). Standard progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridout, N., Noreen, A., & Johal, J. (2009). Memory for emotional faces in naturally occurring dysphoria and induced sadness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 851–860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, T., Kuiper, N., & Kirker, W. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–688.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salo, R., Henik, A., & Robertson, L. C. (2001). Interpreting Stroop interference: An analysis of differences between task versions. Neuropsychology, 15, 462–471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scher, C. D., Ingram, R. E., & Segal, Z. V. (2005). Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability: Empirical evaluation of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 487–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmukle, S. C. (2005). Unreliability of the dot probe task. European Journal of Personality, 19, 595–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., & Ingram, R. E. (1994). Mood priming and construct activation in tests of cognitive vulnerability to unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 663–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skre, I., Onstad, S., Torgersen, S., & Kringlen, E. (1991). High interrater reliability for the structured clinical interview for DSMIIIR axis I (SCID-I). Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 84, 167–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vrijsen, J. N., van Oostrom, I., Speckens, A., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2013). Approach and avoidance of emotional faces in happy and sad mood. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 37, 1–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, T. T., Beevers, C. G., Robinson, A. E., & Ellis, A. J. (2010). Gaze behavior predicts memory bias for angry facial expressions in stable dysphoria. Emotion, 10, 894–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. B., Gibbon, M., First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Davis, M., Borus, J., et al. (1992). The structured clinical interview for DSMIIIR (SCID): Multisite test–retest reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 630–636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants for their time and effort and the Behavioural Science Institute for its support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janna N. Vrijsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vrijsen, J.N., van Oostrom, I., Isaac, L. et al. Coherence Between Attentional and Memory Biases in Sad and Formerly Depressed Individuals. Cogn Ther Res 38, 334–342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-013-9590-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-013-9590-8

Keywords

Navigation