Skip to main content
Log in

The Ethics of the Child Custody Process: Are the American Law Institute’s Guidelines the Answer?

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Our principal ethical concern is that children have greatly differing opportunities to have their developmental needs addressed in the custody process. We illustrate this variation with example cases in five different adult contexts: custodial parent, relocates; natural father disputes an adoption; gay parents break up; “psychological parents” come forward to claim custody or visitation; and the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 is invoked and may disrupt a placement. We acknowledge and then evaluate in relation to our cases, the recent guidelines for custody issued by the American Law Institute (Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution: Analysis and Recommendations, 2002). Our recommendations for an ethical process include making the child a legal player.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997. Public Law, 105–189

  • In re Adoption of Jeremiah Holloway, 732 P. 2d 962 (Utah, 1986)

  • In re Adoption of Baby Boy L., 648 P. 2d 722 (Kan., 1982)

  • In re Adoption of Kelsey S., 823 P. 2d 1 216 (Cal., 1992)

  • In re Adoption of Michael H., 898 P. 2d 891 (Cal., 1995)

  • M. Allen N. Burrell (1996) ArticleTitleComparing the impact of homosexual and heterosexual parents on children: Meta-analysis of existing research Journal of Homosexuality 32 19–35 Occurrence Handle9010824

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Law Institute (2002). The allocation of custodial and decision making responsibility for children. In Principles of the law of family dissolution: Analysis and recommendations (pp. 92–408, Chap. 2)

  • Andersen, E. G. (1998), Children, parents and non-parents: Protected interests and legal standards. Brigham Young Law Review, 936–1002

  • In re B.G., 523 P. 2d 244 (Cal., 1974)

  • In re Baby Girl Clausen, 502 N.W. 2d 648 (Mich., 1993)

  • M. Boccaccini E. Willemsen (1998) ArticleTitleContested adoption and the liberty interest of the child St. Thomas Law Review 10 211–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms v. Bottoms, Va. App. LEXIS 402 (Va. App., 1999)

  • J. Bowlby (1969) Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bowlby (1973) Attachment and loss, Vol. 2: Separation Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bowlby (1980) Attachment and loss, Vol. 3: Loss: sadness and depression Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown v. County of San Joaquin, 601 F. Supp. 655 (U.S. Dist., 1985)

  • Custody of C.C.R.S. 892 P. 2d. 246 (Colo., 1995)

  • California Welfare and Institutions Code, Section 366.25

  • B. Fitzgerald (1999) ArticleTitleChildren of lesbian and gay parents: A review of the literature Marriage and Family Review 29 57–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox v. Fox, 904 P. 2d (Okla., 1995)

  • J. Goldstein A. Freud A.J. Solnit (1973) Beyond the best interests of the child Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. U.S. Code Title 25, Chap. 25

  • Lemley v. Barr, 343 S.E. 2d 101 (W.Va., 1986)

  • J. Lythcott-Hains (1994) ArticleTitleWhere do mixed babies belong? Racial classification in America and its implications for transracial adoption Harvard C.R.-C.L. Law Review 29 531–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriage of Allen, 626 P. 2d 16 (Wn. App., 1981)

  • Marriage of Burgess, 913 P. 2d. 473 (Cal., 1996)

  • Marriage of Francis, 919 P. 2d. 776 (Colo., 1996)

  • J. Millbank (2002) ArticleTitleLesbian and gay family forms: a review of the research Human Rights Defender 11 22–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Orrey Curtiss Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989)

  • Moore, M. (2000) Children of same sex relationships. Paper presented at the National Family Law Conference, Sydney, Australia, July. (Retrieved from Biblioline.com.)

  • Moore v. City of East Clevland, 431 U.S. 494 (1977)

  • Nancy S. v. Michelle G., 279 Cal. Rptr. 212 (Cal. App., 1991)

  • Parham v. J.R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979)

  • C. J. Patterson (1996) Lesbian mothers and their children: Findings from the Bay Area Families Study J. Laird R. J. Green (Eds) Lesbians and gays in couples and families Jossey-Bass San Francisco 420–437

    Google Scholar 

  • C. J. Patterson R. E. Redding (1996) ArticleTitleLesbian and gay families with children: Implications of social science research Journal of Social Issues 52 29–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam v. Smith, 501 S. E. 2d 898 (N.C., 1998)

  • Rickard, M. (2001–2002). Children of lesbian and single women parents. Department of the Parliamentary Library, ACT, Canberra, Australia. (Retrieved from Biblioline.com)

  • Robert T. v Devon T., 200 Cal. App. 3d 657 (1988)

  • Smith, Administrator, New York City Human Resources Administration et al. v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality and Reform, et al., 431 U.S. 816 (1977)

  • Tropeia v. Tropea, 665 N.E. 2d 145 (N.Y. App., 1996)

  • Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000)

  • United States Constitution

  • Vachon v. Pugliese, 931 P. 2d. 371 (Alaska, 1996)

  • E. Willemsen K. Marcel. (1996) ArticleTitleAttachment 101 for attorneys: Implications for infant placement decisions Santa Clara Law Review, 36 439–475

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleanor Willemsen.

Additional information

Eleanor Willemsen, Rebecca Andrews and Bethany Karlin are affiliated with Department of Psychology, Santa Clara University. Rebecca Andrews is now at Syracuse University Law School.

Address correspondence to Eleanor Willemsen, Department of Psychology, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA 95053; e-mail: ewillemsen @scu.edu.

This research was supported by a grant from the Bannan Center for Jesuit Education of Santa Clara University. We wish to acknowledge Bree Nakashima for her assistance with our legal research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Willemsen, E., Andrews, R., Karlin, B. et al. The Ethics of the Child Custody Process: Are the American Law Institute’s Guidelines the Answer?. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 22, 183–211 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-005-3417-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-005-3417-8

Keywords

Navigation