Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Child Abuse Investigations: Reasons for using Child Advocacy Centers and Suggestions for Improvement

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Child protective service (CPS) and child abuse law enforcement (LE) investigators have been required by the majority of states to work together when investigating criminal cases of child abuse. Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) and other. multidisciplinary models of collaboration have developed across the United States to meet these requirements. This study surveyed 290 CPS and LE investigators who use a CAC in their investigations of criminal cases of child abuse. Reasons given for using, centers, include legal or administrative mandate and protocol, child appropriate environment, support, referrals, capacity for medical exams, expertise of center interviewers and access to video and audio technology. Respondents also identified ways that centers could be more helpful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D. F. Beatrice (1990) ArticleTitleInter-agency coordination: A practitioner’s guide to a strategy for effective social policy Administration in Social Work 14 45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • K. C. Faller J. Henry (2000) ArticleTitleChild sexual abuse: A case study community collaboration Child Abuse and Neglect 24 1215–1225 Occurrence Handle11057707

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • N. J. Hochstadt N. J. Harwicke (1985) ArticleTitleHow effective is the multidisciplinary approach? A follow-up study Child Abuse and Neglect 24 1215–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Jenson M. Jacobson Y. Unrau R. L. Robinson (1996) ArticleTitleIntervention for victims of child sexual abuse: An evaluation of the children’s advocacy model Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 13 139–156

    Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Kolbo E. Strong (1997) ArticleTitleMulti-disciplinary team approaches to the investigation and resolution of child abuse and neglect: A national survey Child Maltreatment 2 61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Moran-Ellis N. Fielding (1996) ArticleTitleA national survey of the investigation of child sexual abuse British Journal of Social Work 26 337–356

    Google Scholar 

  • National Children’s Alliance (2003). National Children’s Alliance. Standards for full member programs. Available at http://www.nca-online.org/network.html. Retrieved March 10, 2003

  • D. Royse S. S. Dhooper. E. L. Rompf (2003) Field instruction: .A guide for social work students Allyn and Bacon Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, D. I., & Zangrillo, P. A. (1996). Coordinating investigations of child abuse. Public Welfare, Winter, 21–32

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameU.S. Dept of Justice (2000) Forming a multidisciplinary team to investigate child abuse US Department of Justice Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newman, B.S., Dannenfelser, P.L. & Pendleton, D. Child Abuse Investigations: Reasons for using Child Advocacy Centers and Suggestions for Improvement. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 22, 165–181 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-005-3416-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-005-3416-9

Keywords

Navigation