Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Population-based Assessment of Hospitalizations for Neutropenia from Chemotherapy in Older Adults with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (United States)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To study neutropenia hospitalization (NH) incidence and risk factors in a population-based sample of older adults with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and evaluate the validity of inferences from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked databases.

Methods

NHL cases receiving first-course chemotherapy were identified from Iowa SEER-Medicare. Survival methods evaluated NH risk factors. Medical record and Medicare claims data on chemotherapy and NH were compared.

Results

Of 761 subjects, 165 (21.7%, 95% CI: 18.8, 24.6) were hospitalized for neutropenia. Of those hospitalized, 41% were hospitalized in cycle 1 and 22% in cycle 2. Significant multivariable risk factors for NH were diffuse large cell histology, renal disease, Charlson comorbidity index, and anthracycline chemotherapy but not patient age. Medicare and medical records agreed on month of chemotherapy initiation 95% of the time and chemotherapy type 95% of the time. ICD-9 code 288.0 sensitivity for NH was 80%.

Conclusions

Neutropenia hospitalizations were common in the first 2 chemotherapy cycles, especially among older adults with comorbidity. Findings conflict with a prior medical records study in which age was a risk factor for NH and dose intensity a negative confounder. Valid inferences about age effects on chemotherapy toxicity require more clinical detail than is available in administrative data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tejeda HA, Green SB, Trimble EL et al. (1996) Representation of African-Americans, Hispanics, and whites in National Cancer Institute cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 88(12):812–816

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodwin JS, Hunt WC, Humble CG, Key CR, Samet JM (1988) Cancer treatment protocols. Who gets chosen? Arch Intern Med 148(10):2258–2260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Trimble EL, Carter CL, Cain D, Freidlin B, Ungerleider RS, Friedman MA (1994) Representation of older patients in cancer treatment trials. Cancer 74(7 Suppl):2208–2214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA, Jr., Albain KS (1999) Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med 341(27):2061–2067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis JH, Kilgore ML, Goldman DP et al. (2003) Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21(7):1383–1389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP (2004) Participation in cancer clinical trials: Race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA 291(22):2720–2726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zippin C, Lum D, Hankey BF (1995) Completeness of hospital cancer case reporting from the SEER Program of the National Cancer Institute. Cancer 76:2343–2350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McClish DK, Penberthy L, Whittemore M et al. (1997) Ability of Medicare claims data and cancer registries to identify cancer cases and treatment. Am J Epidemiol 145:227–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks JM, Chrischilles E, Scott S, Ritho J, Chen-Hardee S (2000) Information gained from linking SEER Cancer Registry Data to state-level hospital discharge abstracts. Med Care 38:1131–1140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Doebbeling BN, Wyant DK, McCoy KD et al. (1999) Linked insurance-tumor registry database for health services research. Med Care 37:1105–1115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz JD, Mentnech RM, Kessler LG (1993) Potential for cancer-related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database. Med Care 31:732–748

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chrischilles E, Link B, Scott S, Delgado D, Fridman M (2003) Factors associated with early termination of CHOP therapy and the impact on survival among patients with chemosensitive intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer Control 10:396–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Warren JL, Harlan LC, Fahey A et al. (2002) Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care 40(suppl 4):55–61

    Google Scholar 

  14. Du X, Goodwin JS (2001) Patterns of use of chemotherapy for breast cancer in older women: Findings from Medicare claims data. J Clin Oncol 19:1455–1461

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lamont EB, Lauderdale DS, Schilsky RL, Christakis NA (2002) Construct validity of Medicare chemotherapy claims. The case of 5FU. Med Care 40:201–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Du XL, Osborne C, Goodwin JS (2002) Population-based assessment of hospitalizations for toxicity from chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:4636–4642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL et al. (eds) (2002) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1999. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1973_1999/

  18. Annon (1993) A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors project. N Engl J Med 329:987–994

    Google Scholar 

  19. Solal-Celigny P. Roy P., Colombat P et al. (2004) Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index. Blood 104(5):1258–1265

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tirelli U, Errante D, Van Glabbeke M et al. (1998) CHOP is the standard regimen in patients ≥70 years of age with intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group. J Clin Oncol 16:27–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sonneveld P, de Ridder M, van der Lelie H et al. (1995) Comparison of doxorubicin and mitoxantrone in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using CHOP versus CNOP chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 13:2530–2539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer RM, Browman GP, Samosh ML et al. (1995) Randomized phase II comparison of standard CHOP with weekly CHOP in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 13:2386–2393

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lyman GH, Morrison VA, Dale DC, Crawford J, Delgado DJ, Fridman M (2003) Risk of febrile neutropenia among patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving CHOP chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma 44:2069–2076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz JD, Mentnech RM, Kessler LG (1993) Potential for cancer-related health services research using a linked Medicare tumor registry database. Med Care 31:732–748

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Clinical Classifications Software (ICD-9-CM) Summary and Download. Summary and Downloading Information. April 2003. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD, http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/ccs.htm

  26. Deyo RA, Cherkin C, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morrison VA, Picozzi V, Scott S et al. (2001) The impact of age on delivered dose intensity and hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving initial CHOP chemotherapy: A risk factor analysis. Clin Lymphoma 2:47–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Picozzi VJ, Pohlman BL, Morrison VA et al. (2001) Patterns of chemotherapy administration in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Oncology 15:1296–1306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lyman GH, Dale DC, Friedberg J, Crawford J, Fisher RI (2004) Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A nationwide study. J Clin Oncol 22:4302–4311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Voelker MD, Chrischilles E, Wright K, Link BK, Park T, Delgado D (2004) Factors associated with first course chemotherapy among older patients with newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: National SEER-Medicare study. J Clin Oncol 22(14S: Abstract 6118)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by an unrestricted research grant from Amgen, Inc.

This study used the linked SEER-Medicare database. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors acknowledge the efforts of the Applied Research Program, NCI; the Office of Research, Development and Information, CMS; Information Management Services (IMS), Inc.; and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program tumor registries in the creation of the SEER-Medicare database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Chrischilles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen-Hardee, S., Chrischilles, E.A., Voelker, M.D. et al. Population-based Assessment of Hospitalizations for Neutropenia from Chemotherapy in Older Adults with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17, 647–654 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-0502-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-0502-4

Keywords

Navigation