Abstract
The encyclical proclaims the centrality of human development, which includes acting with gratuitousness and solidarity in pursuing the common good. This paper considers first whether such relationships of gratuitousness and solidarity can be analysed through the prism of traditional theories of social psychology, which are highly influential in current management research, and concludes that certain aspects of those theories may offer useful tools for analysis at the practical level. This is contrasted with the analysis of such relationships through Aristotelian virtue ethics (in particular as interpreted by MacIntyre 1985, 1998, 1999), which is emerging as a strong force in the field of business ethics, and which has strong conceptual similarities with the ideas put forward by Benedict XVI. Aristotelian virtue ethics offers a better fit with the aims of the encyclical at the theoretical level but it presents a number of challenges at the practical level, which the paper suggests may be addressed through the integration in its analysis of human action of models derived from social psychology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Studies in meaningfulness (e.g. Wrzesniewski 2003) have sought to address the consequences of the lack of referential points for truth at the institutional level.
An organisational identity consists of ‘shared, relatively coherent interrelated sets of emotionally charged beliefs, values and norms that bind some people together and help them to make sense of their worlds’ (Trice and Beyer 1993, p. 33).
MacIntyre calls this attitude ‘civic virtue’. This contrasts with Hartman’s (1996 p. 160) description of civic virtue as the role of a citizen in ‘a great community’ involving ‘attitude and even emotion as well as behaviour’ for the sake of the community.
‘Pope Benedict has encouraged the state leaders to create rules so that this sort of worldwide economic crisis isn’t repeated’ by Angela Merkel. Reuters. Available at http://blogs.reuters.com/financial-regulatory-forum/2009/07/07/pope-benedict-seeks-global-authority-for-economy/. Accessed 6 September 2011.
References
Amiot, C. E., de La Sablonniere, R., Terry, D. J., & Smith, J. R. (2007). Integration of social identities in the self: Toward a cognitive-developmental model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 364–388.
Banaji, M. R., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). The self in social contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 297–332.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Beadle, R. (2002). The misappropriation of Macintyre. Reason in Practice, 2, 45–54.
Benedict, XVI. (2009). Encyclical Letter. Caritas in Veritate.
Bennett, M., & Sani, F. (2004). The development of the social self. New York: Psychology Press.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who Is this “We”? levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93.
Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 576–609.
Brickson, S. L. (2007). ‘Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value’. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 864–888.
Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Foundations of positive organizational scholarship. In Positive organisational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koeller.
Carrol, A. B. (1987). In search of the moral manager. Business Horizons, 30(2), 7–16.
Chan, S. (2011). A toxic mix of greed, mistakes and recklessness. Washington, US: International Herald Tribune.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1991). Defining, evaluating and managing corporate social performance: The stakeholder management model. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 331–358.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.
Condor, S. (1996). Social identity and time. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3–20.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Validzic, A. (1998). Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation, and a common ingroup identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 75, 109–120.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Frijda, N. (1993). The place of appraisal in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 357–387.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 1–26.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gond, J.-P., Palazzo, G., Basu, K. (2008). Investigating instrumental corporate social responsibility through the Mafia Metaphor. Symposium on Ethics and Society. Barcelona: IESE.
Harter, S. (2003). The development of self-representations during childhood and adolescence. In R. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford.
Hartman, E. M. (1996). Organizational ethics and the good life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hemingway, C. A. (2005). Personal values as a catalyst for corporate social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 233–249.
Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223–255.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.
Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143–156.
Hursthouse, R. (2003). Virtue Ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Standford: Stanford University.
Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 213–231.
Kilduff, G. J., Elfenbein, H. A., & Staw, B. M. (2010). The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 943–969.
Knights, D., & O’Leary, M. (2005). Reflecting on corporate scandals: The failure of ethical leadership. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14, 359–366.
Knights, D., & O’Leary, M. (2006). Leadership, ethics and responsibility to the other. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 125–137.
Leadbeater, C. (1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur. London: Demos.
MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue. London: Duckworth.
MacIntyre, A. (1998). Whose justice which rationality?. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1999). Social structures and their threats to moral agency. Philosophy, 7, 311.
Maitland, I. (1997). Virtuous markets. The market as school of the virtues. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 17–31.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858–866.
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.
Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32, 925–945.
Martin, F. (2010). Antecedents and consequents of organisational virtues. Doctoral Thesis presented at the University of Manchester, UK.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
Melé, D. (2009a). Current trends in humanism and business. In W. Amann, S. Khan, M. Pirson, H. Spitzeck, & E. Kimalowitz (Eds.), Humanism in business. State of the art. A reflection on humanistic values in today’s business world (pp. 123–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Melé, D. (2009b). Business ethics in action: Seeking excellence in organizations. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Moore, G. (2002). On the implications of the practice-institution distinction: MacIntyre and the application of modern virtue ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 19–32.
Moore, G. (2005a). Corporate character: Modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 659–685.
Moore, G. (2005b). Humanizing business: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(2), 237–255.
Morton, T., & Postmes, T. (2008). Moral mandate or moral defense? The meaning of shared humanity from the perspective of perpetrators. Small group meeting on emotions, social identity, and intergroup conflict. Groningen.
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2003). Positive psychology as the evenhanded positive psychologist views it. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 141–146.
Paul, VI. (1967). Encyclical Letter. Populorum Progressio.
Pelham, B. W. (1995). Self-investment and self-esteem: Evidence for a jamesian model of self-worth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1141–1150.
Pirson, M. (2009). Social entrepreneurship: a blueprint for humane organisations? In W. Amann, S. Khan, M. Pirson, H. Spitzeck, & E. Kimalowitz (Eds.), Humanism in business. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pollitt, M., & Bek, D. (2006). Multinationals in their communities: Social capital approach to corporate citizenship projects. Centre for Business Research, Working Paper No. 337. Cambridge.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106.
Sheldon, K. M., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2002). Psychological need-satisfaction and subjective well-being within social groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 25–38.
Solomon, R. (1992). Ethics and excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stryker, S. (1991). Exploring the relevance of social cognition for the relationship of self and society: Linking the cognitive perspective and identity theory. In J. Howard & P. Callero (Eds.), The self-society dynamic: Cognition, emotion and action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1972). ‘Social categorization’ (La catégorisation sociale). In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction a la Psychologie Sociale. Paris: Larousse.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of group behavior. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitudebehavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776–793.
Thomas, E. F., Mcgarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 194–218.
Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wrzesniewski, A. (2003). Finding Positive Meaning in Work. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organisational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koeller.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, F. Human Development and the Pursuit of the Common Good: Social Psychology or Aristotelian Virtue Ethics?. J Bus Ethics 100 (Suppl 1), 89–98 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1189-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1189-y