Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical Leadership Evaluations After Moral Transgression: Social Distance Makes the Difference

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In light of continuing corporate scandals, the study of ethical leadership remains an important area of research which helps to understand the antecedents and consequences of ethical behavior in organizations. The present study investigates how social distance influences ethical leadership evaluations, and how in turn ethical leadership evaluations affect leader–member exchange (LMX) after a leader’s moral transgression. Based on construal level theory, we propose that higher social distance will lead to more severe evaluations of immoral behavior and therefore entail lower ethical leadership ratings. More- over, we hypothesize that ethical leadership will positively affect LMX. Participants read a scenario describing a moral situation in which a leader, who was presented in either high or low social distance, behaves unethically toward an employee. We tested our predictions using a structural equation modeling approach. As expected, participants in the high social distance condition judged leaders more harshly (i.e., they gave lower ethical leadership ratings) than in the low social distance condition. Thus, social distance moderated the extent to which leaders are perceived as ethical leaders after moral transgression. Moreover, in accordance with our proposition, ethical leadership ratings had a positive influence on LMX.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agerström, J. and F. Björklund: 2009a, ‘Moral Concerns are Greater for Temporally Distant Events and are Moderated by Value Strength’, Social Cognition 27, 261–282.

  • Agerström, J. and F. Björklund: 2009b, ‘Temporal Distance and Moral Concerns: Future Morally Questionable Behavior is Perceived as More Wrong and Evokes Stronger Prosocial Intentions’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 31, 49–59.

  • Agerström, J., F. Björklund and C. M. Allwood: 2009, ‘The Influence of Temporal Distance on Justice and Care Morality’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00724.x.

  • Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). ‘Cynicism in the workplace: some causes and effects’. Journal of Organizational Behavior 18, 449-469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., F. O. Walumbwa and T. J. Weber: 2009, ‘Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions’. Annual Review of Psychology 60, 421–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballinger, G. A., D. W. Lehman and F. D. Schoorman: 2010, ‘Leader–Member Exchange and Turnover Before and After Succession Events’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.04.003.

  • Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny: 1986, ‘The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. and P. Steidlmeier: 1999, ‘Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior’. The Leadership Quarterly 10, 181 − 217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E. and L. K. Treviño: 2006, ‘Ethical leadership: A review and future directions’. The Leadership Quarterly 17, 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., L. K. Treviño and D. A. Harrison; 2005, ‘Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M.: 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. J.: 2009, ‘The perfect storm of leaders’ unethical behavior: A conceptual framework’. International Journal of Leadership Studies 5, 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A. and R. N. Kanungo: 1987, ‘Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings’. The Academy of Management Review 12, 637–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, D. D., & Knippenberg, D. (2004). ‘Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 95, 140–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadhich, A. and K. T. Bhal: 2008, ‘Ethical leader behaviour and leader-member exchange as predictors of subordinate behaviours’. Vikalpa 33, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). ‘Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, 113-126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Hoogh, A. H., and D. N. Den Hartog: 2008, ‘Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study’. The Leadership Quarterly 19, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dienesch, R. M. and R. C. Liden: 1986, ‘Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development’. Academy of Management Review 11, 618–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyal, T., N. Liberman and Y. Trope: 2008, ‘Judging near and distant virtue and vice’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44, 1204–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W.: 2003, ‘Toward a theory of spiritual leadership’. The Leadership Quarterly 14, 693–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C. R. and D. V. Day: 1997, ‘Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues’. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 827–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giessner, S. R. and D. van Knippenberg: 2008, ‘License to fail: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 105, 14–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B.: 2003, ‘Role making onto the starting work team using LMX leadership: Diversity as an asset’. In G. B. Graen (ed.), Dealing with diversity: 1–28. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B. and M. Uhl-Bien: 1995, ‘Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective’. The Leadership Quarterly 6, 219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J.: 2001, ‘The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment’. Psychological Review 108, 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). ‘Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs’. Organizational Research Methods 2, 233-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P.: 1995, ‘Ethical challenges in the leader-follower relationship’. Business Ethics Quarterly 5, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilies, R., J. D. Nahrgang and F. P. Morgeson: 2007, ‘Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis’. Journal of Applied Psychology 92, 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‘Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model’. Academy of Management Review 16, 366–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y., P. A. Keller and B. Sternthal: 2010, ‘Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness’. Journal of Consumer Research 36, 735–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N. and Y. Trope: 2008 ‘The psychology of transcending the here and now’. Science 322, 1201–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., Y. Trope and E. Stephan: 2007, ‘Psychological distance’. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles: 353–383. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., Y. Trope and C. Wakslak: 2007, ‘Construal level theory and consumer behavior’. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17, 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C. and J. M. Maslyn: 1998, ‘Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development’. Journal of Management 24, 43–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). ‘Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs’. Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 114-121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F. and B. Avolio: 2003, ‘Authentic leadership: A positive development approach’. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R.E. Quinn (eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: 241–261. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marist Poll: 2009, Business Ethics in a Time of Economic Crisis. Retrieved from http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/misc/us090309/Business%20Ethics%20Survey/Business%20Ethics%202009.pdf.

  • Mencl, J. and D. R. May: 2009, ‘The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision-making: An exploratory investigation’. Journal of Business Ethics 85, 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. J., D. S. Carlson, K. M. Kacmar, J. A. Roberts and L. B. Chonko: 2009, ‘The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field’. Journal of Business Ethics 90, 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, T. and B. Schyns: 2008, ‘Mehrdimensionale Skala zur Erfassung des Leader–Member Exchange (LMX-MDM nach Liden & Maslyn, 1998) – Übersetzung [Multidimensional Scale for the Assessment of Leader–Member Exchange (LMX-MDM after Liden & Maslyn, 1998) – Translation]’, in A. Glöckner-Rist (ed.), Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen [Compilation of Social Science Items and Scales]. ZIS Version 12.00. Bonn: GESIS.

  • Paulus, C.: 2009, The Saarbruecken Personality Questionnaire on Empathy: Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Retrieved from http://psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2009/2363/.

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). ‘Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies’. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 879-903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). ‘A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance’. Organizational Research Methods 12, 762-800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowold, J., L. Borgmann and K. Heinitz: 2009, ‘Ethische Führung – Gütekriterien einer deutschen Adaptation der Ethical Leadership Scale (ELS-D) von Brown et al. (2005) [Ethical Leadership – Measurement Properties of a German Adaptation oft the Ethical Leadership Scale (ELS-D) by Brown et al. (2005)]’, Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 53, 57–69.

  • Rus, D., van Knippenberg, D., & Wisse, B. (2010). ‘Leader self-definition and leader self-serving behavior’. The Leadership Quarterly 21, 509-529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shacklock, A. and M. Lewis: 2007, ‘Leading with integrity: Ethical leadership – a fundamental principle of integrity and good’. GovNet eJournal 1, 22–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E. and N. Bolger: 2002, ‘Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations’. Psychological Methods 7, 422–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toor, S. and G. Ofori: 2009, ‘Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture’. Journal of Business Ethics 90, 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K. (1992). ‘Experimental approaches to studying ethical-unethical behavior in organizations’. Business Ethics Quarterly 2, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y. and N. Liberman: 2003, ‘Temporal construal’. Psychological Review 110, 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y. and N. Liberman: 2003, ‘Temporal construal’. Psychological Review 110, 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). ‘Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality’. Journal of Applied Psychology 90, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Quaquebeke, N., Kerschreiter, R., Buxton, A., & van Dick, R. (2010). ‘Two lighthouses to navigate: Effects of ideal and counter-ideal values on follower identification and satisfaction with their leaders’. Journal of Business Ethics 93, 293-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., N. Hartman and F. Cavazotte: 2010, ‘Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique’, Organizational Research Methods. doi:10.1177/1094428110366036.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TUM School of Management, Technische Universität München, Leopoldstr. 139, 80804, Munich, Germany

    Andranik Tumasjan, Maria Strobel & Isabell Welpe

Authors
  1. Andranik Tumasjan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Strobel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isabell Welpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andranik Tumasjan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tumasjan, A., Strobel, M. & Welpe, I. Ethical Leadership Evaluations After Moral Transgression: Social Distance Makes the Difference. J Bus Ethics 99, 609–622 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0671-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0671-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation