Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Groupwork on Ethical Decision-Making of Accountancy Students

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent accounting scandals involving the collapse of large corporate firms have brought into question the adequacy of ethics education within accounting programs. This paper investigates the ethical decisions of accountancy students and in particular analyses the effect of group (as opposed to individual) decision-making on ethical decisions. Final year accountancy students (sample size of 165) were randomly allocated into two experimental conditions. The participants were then presented with five (5) ethical vignettes. One experimental condition involved completing the ethical decisions as individuals (60). The other involved completing the ethical decision-making as a group of 3–4 participants (34). A consistent pattern of behaviour was observed in the analysis of individual versus group responses. Individuals displayed stronger tendencies than groups to take the extreme actions of acting either unethically or ethically (whistleblowing), whereas groups displayed stronger tendencies to take the safer (neutral) options. It was concluded that groups reached consensus decisions, in an ethical context, probably as a result of peer pressure. The significant implication of this finding is in relation to the emphasis accounting programs place on group work. Group work may enhance students’ abilities to work as a team. However, as revealed in this study’s results, group work may not be an effective means of producing the optimal decision in all subject matter areas, especially complex areas such as ethical decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdolmohammadi M. J., Gabhart D. R. L., Reeves M. F. (1997). Ethical Cognition of Business Students Individually and in Groups. Journal of Business Ethics 16(6):1717–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdolmohammadi M. J., Reeves M. F.(2003). Does Group Reasoning Improve Ethical Reasoning?. Business & Society Review 108(1):127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Academic Technology Services. (2006). http://www.ats.ucla.edu

  • Accounting Education Change Commission. (1990). ‘Objectives of Education for Accountants: Position Statement Number One’, Issues in Accounting Education, AECC Fall, 306–312

  • Ahadiat N., Mackie J. J. (1993). Ethics education in accounting: An investigation of the importance of ethics as a factor in the recruiting decisions of public accounting firms. Journal of Accounting Education 11(2):243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong M. B. (1987). Moral development and accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education 5:27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumhart R.(1968). Ethics in business. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief A. P., Dukerick J. M., Brown P. R., Brett J. F. (1996). What’s Wrong With The treadway Commission Report?. Journal of Business Ethics 15(2):183–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brommer M., Gratto C., Gravander J., Tuttle M. (1987). A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 6(4):265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, G. F. and D. J. Frizsche: 1985, ‘Using Vignettes in Business Ethics Research’, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 12(2), 279–293

  • Chalos, P. and S. Pickard: 1985, ‘Information Choice and Cue Use: An Experiment in Group Information Processing’, Journal of Applied Psychology 70(6), 634–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S. G., Bailey D. E. (1997). What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite. Journal of Management (23):239–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. R., Pant L. W., Sharp D. J. (1998). The effect of gender and academic discipline diversity on the ethical evaluations, ethical intentions and ethical orientation of potential public accounting recruits. Accounting Horizons 12(3):250

    Google Scholar 

  • Cree, M. and G. Baring: 1991, ‘Desperately Seeking Ethics’, Australian Accountant 15(8), 21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas P. C., Davidson R. A., Schwartz B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgements. Journal of Business Ethics 34(2):101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky A.J., Loken B. (1989). Analyzing Marketing’s Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Research 19(4):83–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt K M., Kahwajy J. L., Bourgeos L. J. I. (1997). How Teams Can Have a Good Fight. Harvard Business Review (75):77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Eynon G., Hills N. T., Stevens K. T. (1997). Factors that Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 16(12–13):1297–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O.C., Gresham L.G. (1985). A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49(3):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford R. C., Richardson W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13(3):205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haswell S., Jubb P. (1995). Unethical tendencies. Charter 66(3):102–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall E. J., Mouton J. S., Blake R. R. (1963). Group problem solving effectiveness under conditions of pooling vs. interaction. Journal of Social Psychology 59:14–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill G. W. (1982). Groups versus individual performance: Are n + 1 heads better than 1?. Psychological Bulletin 91:517–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloman C. R., Hendrick H. W. (1971). Problem solving in different sized groups. Personnel Psychology 24:489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck S.W., Cormier W.H., Bounds W.G.(1974). Reading statistics and research. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis I. L.(1982). Groupthink (2 ed). Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey C. (1993). Ethical development of accounting students, non-accounting business students, and liberal arts students. Issues in Accounting Education 8(1):86–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review 16(2):366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones J., Massey D. W.,Thorne L. (2003). Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning: Insights from Past Research and Implications for the Future. Journal of Accounting Literature 22:45–103

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath J. E.(1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs N.J

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneaux D. (2004). After Andersen: An Experience of Integrating Ethics into Undergraduate Accountancy Education. Journal of Business Ethics 54(4):385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore R. S., Radloff S. E. (1996) Attitudes Towards Business Ethics Held By South African Students. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(8):863–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. L.: 2003, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (Allyn & Bacon, Boston)

  • Nichols M. L., Day V. E. (1982). A Comparison of Moral Reasoning of Groups and Individuals on the ”Defining Issues Test. Academy of Management Journal, 25(1):201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary C., Radich R. (2001). An Analysis of Australian Final Year Accountancy Students’ Ethical Attitudes. Teaching Business Ethics 5(3):235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon L. A., Glazer A. (1990). Accounting Education and Ethical Development: the Influence of Liberal Learning on Students and Alumni in Accounting Practice. Issues in Accounting Education 5:195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Preble J. F., Reichel A. (1988) Attitudes Towards Business Ethics of Future Managers in the U.S. and Israel. Journal of Business Ethics 7(1):941–949

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R.(1979). Development in Judging Moral Issues. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Preaeger Publishers Inc., New York)

  • Rohrbaugh J. (1979). Improving the Quality of Group Judgement: Social Judgement Analysis and the Delphi Technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 24:73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke M. (1997). Gender Differences in Ethical Frameworks and Evaluation of Others’ Choices in Ethical Dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics 16:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvanathan, A., S. Selvanathan, G. Keller, W. Brain and M. Bartel: 2000, Australian Business Statistics (Thomas Nelson, Australia)

  • Shaub M. K. (1994). An analysis of the association of traditional demographic variables with the moral reasoning of auditing students and auditors. Journal of Accounting Education 12(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sniezek J. A., Henry R. A. (1989). Accuracy and Confidence in Group Judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner I. D (1972). Group processes and productivity. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review 11(3):601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., Youngblood S. A. (1990). Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 75(4):378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welkowitz J., Ewen R. B., Cohen J.(1982). Introductory statistics for the behavioral sciences. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, San Diego CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte W.H.(1956).The organization man. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland University of Technology, George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia

    Conor O’Leary & Gladies Pangemanan

Authors
  1. Conor O’Leary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gladies Pangemanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conor O’Leary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Leary, C., Pangemanan, G. The Effect of Groupwork on Ethical Decision-Making of Accountancy Students. J Bus Ethics 75, 215–228 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9248-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9248-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation